decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Judge does Apple a big favor | 627 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Judge does Apple a big favor
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 02 2012 @ 03:17 AM EDT
As the court has already said, this isn't about punishing Apple. This is about
Apple setting the record straight with the public.

All the court is doing is making apple set up a "get the facts"
section on their page because the "facts" that Apple tried to pass to
the public were, at the very, least misleading if not outright lies.

If apple wants to fire their proverbial foot-guns, they certainly have the right
and opportunity to do so, but that's on their dime and their time; not the
courts. All the court demands is for Apple to post the truth to offset the
public damage they've caused to the Samsung brand.

Apple so far has been childish about this (someone actually proposed the idea of
autism, and we shouldn't confuse childish behaviour with a disease. It's not
like Apple can't help their behaviour. They simply need to grow up and tell the
truth.)


[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )