decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
PJ quoted as a "Patent Expert"? | 627 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
PJ quoted as a "Patent Expert"?
Authored by: kuroshima on Friday, November 02 2012 @ 09:55 AM EDT
Again, PJ has a much better bating average than other so called experts. Still, IMHO, the moral thing for PJ to do would be to send them an email, with the facts - She is no longer the sole administrator of Groklaw, and this is no longer her blog (It's Mark's too, and IIRC, coverage of this has come from both of them - disclaimer, PJ, GL will always be your brainchild, and your retirement is more active than many active jobs). She is not a patent expert, though she has legal training.

I understand that that is going the extra mile, and that it is inviable to try to police the whole internet in search for mistakes when providing attribution (Mind you, I would at least ask them to correct the name, they're calling her Pamelo Jones). I also understand that Groklaw getting quoted instead of that other source is a great victory in itself, and that it may not be worth risking that delicate blossom with nitpicking. I however think it would set Groklaw apart from other sources.

Finally, a personal remark: Go Groklaw! It's time this wonderful site started appearing as a news source in the media. I myself frequent a number of tech blogs and news feeds (mostly Android related), and I always try to counter any FUD that quotes that other blog

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )