|Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, December 06 2012 @ 09:33 PM EST|
|Actually it meanms absolutely nothing. |
If she had said something during the hearing like "How can you defend
someone lying during voir dire?" or "How can you attack one of the
jurors?" you would know.
Even if she outright throws out the verdict, she still has to deal with these
other issues.Maybe she just decided she that she is ... well "fully
Keep in mind that the CAFC and the SCOTUS spend a lot time, effort, blood, bone
and sinew to create IP case law. They don't want some smuck off the street just
waltzing in and upsetting the apple cart with his wacko theories. They will find
a way to admit those statements because they want to.
Who knows Samsung may amend their filings claiming a new precedent, that they
did not infronge based on the fact that their stuff runs on a different
processor-- call it the Hogan precedent. If the CAFC see's that I'm sure they
will overturn the verdict in a New York minute.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]