decoration decoration

When you want to know more...
For layout only
Site Map
About Groklaw
Legal Research
ApplevSamsung p.2
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Gordon v MS
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
MS Litigations
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
OOXML Appeals
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v Novell
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal

User Functions



Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Hey Darl ... | 108 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Hey Darl ...
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 21 2013 @ 05:11 PM EST
is that you?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

With all due respect...
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 21 2013 @ 05:16 PM EST
Why don't you apply to be Cahn's gargbage fairy.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"So, about that "dispose" part... I wonder who gets all the materials?"
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, February 21 2013 @ 05:42 PM EST
In as much as SCO is still involved in several lawsuits, knowing who gets the
material means knowing who to subpoena for discovery.

Or did you really not know that discovery on one of those court cases has yet
to start?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"So, about that "dispose" part... I wonder who gets all the materials?"
Authored by: rcsteiner on Thursday, February 21 2013 @ 05:43 PM EST
The nature of many of SCO's documents *is* Groklaw's business.

-Rich Steiner >>>---> Mableton, GA USA
The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"So, about that "dispose" part... I wonder who gets all the materials?"
Authored by: PJ on Friday, February 22 2013 @ 12:53 AM EST
Heh heh. Why don't *you* mind yours?

Journalists record what is happening in the
world. It's what the job is, minding
other people's business, figuring out what
is factual, and then telling
the world.

Now, tell us, please. Why don't you want
us to know? Do you know?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I wish we could
Authored by: capt.Hij on Friday, February 22 2013 @ 08:45 AM EST
I really wish we could mind our own business. Sadly, when
there are sharks like the folks at SCO swimming in these
waters you have to watch them closely. Had SCO minded its
own business they might still be selling and making
software. Unfortunately for all of us SCO stuck its nose in
to the linux business and would never let up. SCO may be
gone whittled away, but there are still other predators out
there whose only goal is to eat the fruit of other's hard
work, and they too must be watched.

Nice sentiment. Wrong context.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"So, about that "dispose" part... I wonder who gets all the materials?"
Authored by: DannyB on Friday, February 22 2013 @ 10:03 AM EST
SCO wants everyone in the world to pay them $699 for each electronic device in
their home, car or workplace which has an embedded computer.

That makes it our business.

The price of freedom is eternal litigation.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Disgruntled share holder
Authored by: Gringo_ on Friday, February 22 2013 @ 11:30 AM EST

I suspect there are more than a few who held on to SCO shares to the bitter end and still hold them, praying for a payout. He is probably angry at us here at Groklaw for raining on his parade. He should take his anger out on SCO, where it belongs, along with the crooked system that permitted SCO to begin these frivolous lawsuits in the first place. If SCO had been shut down at the start of them, sure they would have taken a hit, but then could have go on to focus on serving the needs of their customers instead of suing them and thereby find a way to profitability.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

"So, about that "dispose" part... I wonder who gets all the materials?"
Authored by: phands on Friday, February 22 2013 @ 06:13 PM EST
Well, Darl/Blake/Ralph/Blepp's Briefcase,

It IS our business. SCO attempted to blackmail companies I
worked for, and I make my living from Linux, and have done
so since the late 1990s. I've followed the SCO
travesty/jihad since it started, both here and at other
discussion forums. SCO were vermin, and got exterminated.

It's not only my has a personal dimension

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )