decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Time for the Oracle Shareholders Class Action | 388 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Good point! - n/t
Authored by: Gringo_ on Sunday, May 06 2012 @ 01:30 AM EDT

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Good point! - n/t - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, May 06 2012 @ 03:55 AM EDT
    • Good point! - Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, May 06 2012 @ 03:56 AM EDT
    Time for the Oracle Shareholders Class Action
    Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, May 06 2012 @ 06:59 AM EDT
    To take center stage.

    They should sue the Oracle BOD and particular Mr (I've got an brand new yacht)
    Ellison over misuse of company funds. IT was clear to many of us techies at the
    time that SUN was nothing more than a pig's ear dressed up as silk.

    The Oracle CEO's ego won't let him go in front of the shareholders and admit
    that HE made a mistake.

    The admission in court that the 'Due Diligence' was done in such a short time
    should be enough evidence to get the BOD removed lock stock and smoking java.

    [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

    Not true! They did their due dilligence.
    Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, May 06 2012 @ 11:27 AM EDT


    All 3 days of it.

    They said so under oath,

    [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

    It's not Sun's fault that Oracle is stupid
    Authored by: marcosdumay on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 11:24 AM EDT
    Sun had lots of IP, that could be used in lots of ways. The fact that Oracle is
    too incompetent to get anything out of them is not Sun's fault.

    [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

    The original con was McNealy's
    Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 03:48 PM EDT
    I take it you haven't seen Goslings view on these issues.

    [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

    Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
    Comments are owned by the individual posters.

    PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )