|
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, July 29 2012 @ 09:46 PM EDT |
Well it's been pointed out that lazy journalists who don't have sufficient law
experience will be put 'in awe' of the legal jargon and prose that Florian
dishes out. Combined with tight deadlines, many journalists will simply choose
to quote Florian in detail.
This works well for Flo as he is paid to paint a negative media image, which is
why he writes a continuous stream of articles with negative sentiment for the
mainstream media to quote.
If only the media would pick up as much from Groklaw to get the balanced view.
Speaking of which - I trust we will have daily courtroom transcripts like we did
in Ora V Goog, with PJ's commentary.. that was such an entertaining month !![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Winter on Monday, July 30 2012 @ 03:28 AM EDT |
Therefore, you look for a "neutral" source that just happens to
support your partisan position (ad dollars, whatever).
People seem to have stopped believing the "taxi driver told me", or
the "unnamed sources". So they go to an analyst that delivers paid-for
"neutral analysis".
Rob
---
Some say the sun rises in the east, some say it rises in the west; the truth
lies probably somewhere in between.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|