You've shown that the pseudo logic can be applied the same logically with the
differences being embodied in the particular language.
And therein lies
part of my point to the author that suggested:
If it was copied, creativity
must have been involved
As though somehow the only reason for something to
be (or even just appear when in reality it wasn't) copied is because it was
creative.
Part of the point I was making was: given a particular small
specification (which range check is), there is - in any given language - a small
subset of ways to actually code the logic unless one wants to start authoring
bloat.
Given a range check function is a basic building block of data
validation combined with the thousands of developers in the world. Even if
every developer authors their own version in a vacuum, there's going to be a
large amount of overlap and - in some cases - what appears to be exactly
identical code.
RAS[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|