decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Should never get that far | 101 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Should never get that far
Authored by: jonathon on Sunday, August 12 2012 @ 12:04 AM EDT
Simple solution:

When the patent is nullified, the troll has to pay the licensee back at an
APR of 40% on the average daily balance of the what was paid, with
the due date being the date that the extortionist obtained the patent.

If the penalty is not paid, then all assets of all of the directors must be
seized, and liquidated, to pay the penalty. If that does not generate
enough revenue to pay the penalty, then all of the assets of all
shareholders must be seized and liquidated to pay the penalty. if that
does not generate enough revenue to pay the penalty, all of the law
firms that represented the troll in any legal matter, regardless of what
the legal business was, must collective pay the penalty that the troll
incurred. In they event that they do not come up with cash, their assets
must be seized and liquidated to pay the penalty.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )