|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 23 2012 @ 09:17 AM EDT |
Out of curiosity it appears that Apple may have been more in the wrong here than
Samsung, so why did Samsung not push for sanctions against Apple (before Apple
filed for sanctions against them), or stronger sanctions against Apple than they
were to have received?
Given that they seem willing to explore most avenues of defence/counter-attack
it seems a little odd. Would Samsung be able to ask for stronger sanctions
against Apple when whatever the verdict is, is appealed? Or use it to defend
against Apple arguing that sanctions/equal treatment was unfair (at appeal)?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, August 23 2012 @ 11:53 AM EDT |
Skill's the best part of magic.
Apple seems to have taken at least eight months to destroy evidence and prepare
a barrage of motions before even filing suit so as to keep Samsung in the
defensive throughout the whole trial.
Poor Samsung didn't know what hit it.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|