decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
I think this Judge will push on through regardless. | 458 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
I think this Judge will push on through regardless.
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 24 2012 @ 07:43 AM EDT
I almost feel pity for Apple here; when the announcement was first made, they must have thought the foreman was fantastic, and then every time he opened his mouth, the lawyers must have a mounting feeling of dread and horror. His mouth will end up getting nearly 2billion dollars kept out of Apple's hands.
That's not as bad as it sounds since his mouth was responsible for the ridiculous numbers in the first place.

And it is not like Apple isn't milking this likely temporary victory for all that it's worth while it lasts.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I think this Judge will push on through regardless.
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, September 24 2012 @ 08:28 AM EDT
<blockquote>If it's as I suspect, and she's stressed about her Apple
shares </blockquote>

If she knew that she owned shares in Apple and did not recuse herself at the
outset, then she has more to worry about than her stock portfolio. But I assume
that if she has any stock holdings that she has her investments in a blind trust
as most other government officials do so as to totally forgo any question of
impartiality.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )