decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
I fear you don't understand the nature of UK court orders | 627 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Are there then no significant consequences?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 02 2012 @ 04:26 AM EDT
Letter of the law vs. spirit of the law.

The general public may have been aware of this lawsuit as it did get press,
including front page of the BBC website.

Now Apple have done this and it's gained even more promimence the general public
are even more likely to know about it.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

I fear you don't understand the nature of UK court orders
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 02 2012 @ 05:07 AM EDT
They are not open to gaming like the US system. You are required to do exactly
what the court says no additions, no subtractions and no distractions.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Are there then no significant consequences?
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 02 2012 @ 05:14 AM EDT
This is not a bright comment. Pot calling the kettle. Who is
complaining platform bias. Your platform bias lauds law
breaking thuggery

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Daily Mail
Authored by: Wol on Friday, November 02 2012 @ 05:04 PM EDT
Dunno what the American equivalent is, but we have the gutter press, the tabloid
newspapers, and the broadsheets.

They've been told to publish this in one of the two tabloids, and one of the
broadsheets. Plus THE financial newspaper. In other words, there's a pretty good
chance anyone from the lower-middle-classes up will either read the notice in
their own newspaper or have their friends point it out to them.

(Which is why the "advertisement" might also seriously upset the
Judges ...)

Cheers,
Wol

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )