decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Perhaps you are reading too much into the article | 186 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
More than that...FM is infamous on Groklaw, and all commentators were skeptical....
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 23 2012 @ 12:42 PM EST
And we are all wondering how much of whose coin he is being paid in, this
time.

PJ, your restraint in this is nothing short of amazing!

(Christenson)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Perhaps you are reading too much into the article
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 23 2012 @ 02:59 PM EST
The document FM quoted, and the document PJ has shown us are
of necessity and by law two different documents. PJ has given us
here the stipulation the parties have filed with the court as a result
of their agreement, which they are not required to file.

Worse, the purported redacted agreement that FM claims to have is so
heavily redacted that he has chosen to extrapolate from a similar and
contemporaneous agreement between Apple and VIA. Dangerous.
He could get away with that in the twittersphere, but not with the
beady eyes of GL focussed on him.

Going back to the OP above, I've noticed a few little slips lately
suggesting PJ may be tired, overworked, perhaps in need of
a holiday. ISTR last time this happened she was extremely reluctant
to leave us on our own, but I thought that was why Mark had
now come aboard.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )