decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Pompous the assertions -- dull the proof | 264 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Judge Koh Grants HTC's Redactions; Denies Samsung's Motion to File Supplement Expert Declaration~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 12 2012 @ 01:36 PM EST
And how is samsung abusing their FRAND patents. People on
Apple's side keep saying this, however everything I have seen
shows them using them as they should.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Please produce evidence of Samsung's abuse
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 12 2012 @ 01:48 PM EST

Don't just claim it as others have lately - please produce actual evidence.

And I don't refer to statements by FM as your evidence. I refer to actual facts that have come to light in Court Filings.

In other words: if all you have is heresay, you'll need to do better then that.

I'm willing to accept Samsung is abusing their patents - but not without proof. So evidence please!

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Judge Koh Grants HTC's Redactions; Denies Samsung's Motion to File Supplement Expert Declaration~pj
Authored by: mupi on Wednesday, December 12 2012 @ 01:59 PM EST
You also state as if it's a fact that Samsung violated Apple's patents (they
"leveraged ...Apple's look and feel"). This is very much in dispute,
and not just in this case. In THIS case, a jury who was swayed by an incorrect
argument (prior art must be interoperable) which is nowhere a standard of patent
law, determined that Samsung had violated apples patents. But in lots of other
cases (notably, a case in the UK) Samsung was found not to have infringed.



[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Judge Koh Grants HTC's Redactions; Denies Samsung's Motion to File Supplement Expert Declaration~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 12 2012 @ 02:06 PM EST
"Google (and the manufacturers) have engaged in much worse
behavior regarding their patents"

Wow, what talking points are you reading from? Can you
provide some examples of Google (not a manufacturer by the
way) engaging in "much worse behavior regarding their
patents"? I'd really like to see that.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Pompous the assertions -- dull the proof
Authored by: BJ on Wednesday, December 12 2012 @ 02:32 PM EST
If you want to gain folks towards
your viewpoint, maybe you should
back up what you assert.

I for one was only minding my own
business when Apple came out some
time ago and started a patent offensive.
I took offensive and here we are.

Nothing to do with a priori likes or
dislikes. The one who gets carried
away in those seems to be
your very self.

bjd


[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Your response was a big disappointment
Authored by: Gringo_ on Wednesday, December 12 2012 @ 02:46 PM EST
Your opening comment immediately
struck me as potentially a troll post,
but was just enough to indicate that you
might not be a troll, but rather,may
have a refreshingly different point of
view to contribute.

I gave you a respectful reply, then you
let me down by showing yourself
to be just a common, ugly troll. All your
arguments have been said by
other trolls before you, and more
intelligently and elegantly.

All your arguments have been defeated
long ago, if you had been
keeping up on the topic.

You should really post this on Slashdot,
where troll.posts are valued,
even when shot down a 100 times over
they will get you mod points
from the other like-minded folks there
who got moderation privileges

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Judge Koh Grants HTC's Redactions; Denies Samsung's Motion to File Supplement Expert Declaration~pj
Authored by: PJ on Wednesday, December 12 2012 @ 02:47 PM EST
Here's what we are rooting for: a fair trial,
which is what Samsugn did not get. You should
root for that too. Don't you think?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Wow...
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, December 12 2012 @ 05:37 PM EST
Thank you for that steaming pile of expertly non-supported nonsense.

Poor poor Apple being abused by FRAND negotiations they refuse to participate
in, while having their intellectual innovations like round corners stolen right
and left.

That's why their lawsuits are doing so well in the rest of the world, while the
US is shutting them out... oh... well, something like that...

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )