Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, March 07 2013 @ 06:45 PM EST |
Apple
defeats Samsung in High Court patent
battle - Telegraph
Not many 'good' sources for the story available as
yet.
Others seem to be celebrating more than covering the story,
mentioning
necessity to license as FRAND when it was not yet
relevant to the case. Claims
seem to be invalid because of
prior art or obviousness rather than because of
any
'software' aspect of patentability? (- as previously found
in UK cases). [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, March 07 2013 @ 07:11 PM EST |
H
ow Patent Trolls Kill Innovation
- YouTube
Austin Meyer, a software
developer and aviation
enthusiast created a flight simulator called X-Plane. As
many software developers do, Meyer made his application
available on mobile
devices like the iPhone and Android. And
this is where he first ran into
trouble.
A company called Uniloc has sued Meyer for patent
infringement
over a patent called, "System and Method for
Preventing Unauthorized Access to
Electronic Data." (This is
the way that his (Android?) app is bought online) [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 12:32 AM EST |
FM is a sensationalist and should be ignored.
Because Microsoft
cannot force Google to
sign deals
with them in Germany, it will take much much
more than
banning Google maps.
- C [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: bilateralrope on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 01:55 AM EST |
Given FM's apparent allergy to the truth, what is the truth in this case ? [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 03:20 AM EST |
...if someone wants to post a quote from Selley or
anything else
written by the National Post, they are now
presented with pop-up box seeking a
licence that starts at
$150 for the Internet posting of 100 words with an
extra fee
of 50 cents for each additional word (the price is cut in half
for
non-profits).
Michael Geist[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 07:15 AM EST |
What's his accuraccy rate again?
It's somewhere close to 100% wrong, isn't it?
So I would take away that the German Court is certainly *NOT* going to ban
Google Maps, based on all the evidence.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: mossc on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 11:38 AM EST |
That site can't be taken seriously.
If you are quoting the whole article that pushes the boundary of fair use unless
you are the author (which you may be if so identify yourself)
Please remove the article.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 12:22 PM EST |
And realize it must mean exactly the opposite of what it says... Florian's
consistency is amazing.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, March 08 2013 @ 01:05 PM EST |
Can one use data from when the National Socialist Party ran Germany, in a
court case in Germany in 2013? The only difference is that Germany used pen
and paper, with people putting pins on where the geographic locations are,
instead of a machine putting virtual pins on the map.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, March 09 2013 @ 08:03 PM EST |
Florian's accuracy is so bad that I don't believe anything he posts. Do you
have proof of this from another, reliable, source?
Wayne
http://madhatter.ca
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: PJ on Saturday, March 09 2013 @ 11:57 PM EST |
You quoted too much. Provide a paragraph or
so at most. Then a plain text link.
Or ignore the guy. Your choice.
Meanwhile, watch what the stock does, and in
a couple of months, we'll see if the prediction
comes true. If not, I'll write about it then.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|