decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Off the deep end.... | 336 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Tim Cook himself....
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, March 21 2013 @ 01:17 PM EDT
Tim Cook himself expressed some doubt about the viability of the litigation
strategy. He may have seen the numbers, too.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Why Chrome?
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, March 21 2013 @ 01:25 PM EDT
Honest question:

What does Chrome have, to recommend it over Firefox?

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Off the deep end....
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, March 21 2013 @ 03:10 PM EDT
...on one hand, I dislike Apple's litigation. It hasn't
encouraged me to buy Apple products.
...on the other hand, it hasn't changed any of my purchasing
decisions. Longer-term, what has and will change my
purchasing decisions is:
(a) Apple's relatively closed OS.
(b) Price.
(c) My hatred of iTunes.
(d) Apple's weak cloud sevices.

...and I guess the truth about Microsoft's brand is that the
major brand damage involves the really annoying buggy
software they foisted off on consumers for years at a time.

Shorter-term, Apple's stock price dropped because, as an
increasingly undifferentiated luxury brand, their accessible
market is limited. Their litigation probably didn't make
much difference.

--Argyle

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )