decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Believe it or not, SCO pops its head up again ~pj | 244 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Ya' think? (or not...) (n/t)
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 05:25 PM EDT

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Believe it or not, SCO pops its head up again ~pj
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 07:44 PM EDT
You might imagine this was deliberate destruction of
evidence. I know that they were given permission, but all IBM
has to do is require one of the documents that were
destroyed. I can't imagine that going down well with any
judge.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Destruction of evidence?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 10:41 AM EDT
You can't destroy evidence even if someone told you that you could destroy all
your documents.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Maybe they can't shred them yet
Authored by: YetAnotherSteve on Saturday, March 30 2013 @ 12:37 PM EDT
The motion for permission to shred documents included paying someone to check
them first. I'm imagining them finding that almost all of the remaining
documents have to be kept until this case is over.

I wouldn't be surprised if IBM had a better idea than SCO about how much storage
is needed for SCO's unshreddable paperwork.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )