|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 10:24 AM EDT |
. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 01:05 PM EDT |
"Problem: Replacing the Windows product registration
mechanism lets OEM’s own the process and prevents Microsoft from building into
the registration process future valued added Windows Services. In sum. it lets
OEM’s interject themselves into the first boot customer experience and offer
customers valued added services before a Microsoft proposition of similar
services."
"Recommendion: OEM’s be allowed to
define the client UI portion of product registration. However. they must submit
the product registration information to a Microsoft product registration server
using the Microsoft registration transport. It’s strategically very important
that Microsoft owns the transport so that it can build upon this clientserver
interaction."
link
`One thing I find myself wondering about is whether we
shouldn’t try and make the “ACPI” extensions somehow Windows specific.' link
Linux and FreeBSD do not work with this motherboard due
to it's ACPI configuration, using a disassembler program, I have found that it
detects Linux specifically and points it to bad DSDT tables, thereby corrupting
it's hardware support." link[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: albert on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 01:46 PM EDT |
Is there a Spanish speaker who could get these documents to Hispalinux? (or at
least see if they already have them)[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|