Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 04:41 PM EDT |
Shouldn't this just get dismissed since they asked for and
got permission to destroy their documentation in bankruptcy
court? [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Nick_UK on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 05:59 PM EDT |
...groundsco day.
Nick[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 07:45 PM EDT |
should have been published first of april. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 08:06 PM EDT |
Now that the court has authorized them to destroy the records, it makes sense to
go forward. Couldn't do that before, because the prison terms were unattractive
to certain parties.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: symbolset on Tuesday, March 26 2013 @ 09:52 PM EDT |
After the administrator files the final papers dissolving the entity, a long
lost
heir claiming rights to these untold potential billions will ride in from
the
East. Debunked one by one, each rejected pretender will multiply until
they
turn into a horde of dubious claimants.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Tinstaafl on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 12:25 AM EDT |
Scombie [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 12:46 AM EDT |
Maybe they accidentally dropped a stack of paper in the Outbox instead of the
shredder.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 02:02 AM EDT |
The Night of the Living Dead. I just KNEW we had not
heard the last of SCO. Its time to release the IBM
Nazguls!!! Now if *I* were the judge, I'd ask SCO what
IBM could recover from SCO should they lose?!? Will
SCO lose?!? Of course they will lose -- they haven't won
a single round, yet they hope to beat IBM?!? SCO is
filing a "Nuisance Lawsuit", as such on that grounds
SCO's request should hereby be DENIED!! IF it were
allowed to go forward I would force SCO to put into
escrow the sum of 20 Million dollars or more in the
-- likely -- event SCO were to lose. If SCO can't come up
with the money to put into escrow, the "request" would
be DENIED!!! When is some judge somewhere going to
stand up and shout, "SCO has no clothes"... or even a
legal leg, to stand upon. I am sick and tired of greedy
con men using our legal system to try and extort
gazillions of dollars from companies. SCO has had its
day in court -- more than its day -- and it has LOST
EVERY SINGLE TIME on every single issue, in front
of several different judges and even a jury, and here
they are back again?!? No, ANY SANE Judge should
simply DENY the request, and if they want to fight
about then they need forced to put into Escrow all the
money needed to pay the IBM Nazguls, plus damages
to pay to IBM when SCO loses -- and they will lose --
since SCO is BANKRUPT and has NO MONEY. You
don't get to play the "Litigation Lottery" forever. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: fxbushman on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 11:22 AM EDT |
It looks like April 1st comes a few days early for SCO. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, March 27 2013 @ 05:20 PM EDT |
Maybe they've been hanging around my buddy Zombie Zak, and picked up some of his
tricks...
Waynehttp://madhatter.ca [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: mtew on Thursday, March 28 2013 @ 08:06 PM EDT |
Is the 'Principal' (Cahn) libel for any sanctions or
penalties? If not, why not?
---
MTEW[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|