decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

SCO v Novell Timeline


Novell Timeline

SCO Group v. Novell, Inc


Utah U.S. District Court - History for 2:04-cv-139 [Pacer, Fee-based]

Assigned to: Judge Dale A. Kimball
Post remand by U. S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit - Denver, Judge Kimball recused himself after the appeal;
case reassigned to Hon. Ted Stewart.

[Note: Pending motions are in red text. For those who are color blind, look for the word pending.]

Links to what you might be looking for:
Jump to: [--] [50] [100] [150] [200] [250] [300] [350] [400] [450] [500] [550] [600] [650] [700] [750] [800] [850]

DOCKET # DATE ACTION ACTOR
[PDF] 20-Jan-2004 Original Complaint filed by SCO Grp in state court [In the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah] [Comparative [Chart] [00]/[31]] [Article]
[Text]
SCO
[01] 06-Feb-2004 Notice of Removal. Assigned to Judge Kimball Receipt no.: 136232 (mks) [Article] [Text] Court
09-Feb-2004 Clerk's mailing of certificate of acknowledgment of alternative dispute resolution option. Mailed, faxed or emailed to plaintiff SCO Grp, defendant Novell Inc (mks) Court
09-Feb-2004 Notification of Filing mailed to Register of Copyrights. (mks) Court
[02] 09-Feb-2004 Motion by Novell Inc to dismiss (blk)
[Referenced by [03] [13] [18] [19] [24] [26] [29].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[03] 09-Feb-2004 Memorandum by Novell Inc in support of [2-1] motion to dismiss (blk) [Text] Novell
[04] 09-Feb-2004 Notice of filing Original Affidavit of Ryan L. Richards Re: Memo in Support of Novell's Motion for Change of Venue. (motion and memo filed in State Court and not on this case docket yet) (blk) Court
[05] 10-Feb-2004 Certificate of election filed by plaintiff SCO Grp Refer to: Litigation (blk) SCO
[06] 10-Feb-2004 Motion and Order signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball, 10-Feb-2004 Granting motion/PHV for Attorney Goldstein Paul on behalf of defendant Novell Inc cc:attys (blk) Court
[07] 10-Feb-2004 Motion and Order signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball, 10-Feb-2004 Granting motion/PHV for Attorney Michael A. Jacobs on behalf of defendant Novell Inc cc:attys (blk) Court
[08] 10-Feb-2004 Motion and Order signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball, 10-Feb-2004 Granting motion/PHV for Attorney Matthew I. Kreeger on behalf of defendant Novell Inc cc:attys (blk) Court
[09] 27-Feb-2004 Stipulation by SCO Grp, Novell Inc stipulated to extend time for SCO to file a memo in opposition to Novell's motion to dismiss up to and including 05-Mar-2004. SCO will not file any further pleadings in the matter until it files its opposition memo. (blk) [Referenced by [10].] [Text] SCO/
Novell
[10] 01-Mar-2004 Order granting [9-1] stipulation motion stipulated to extend time for SCO to file a memo in opposition to Novell's motion to dismiss up to and including 05-Mar-2004. SCO will not file any further pleadings in the matter until it files its opposition memo signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball, 01-Mar-2004 cc:atty (blk) [Text] Court
[11] 05-Mar-2004 Motion by SCO Grp to remand (blk)
[Referenced by [12] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [26] [29].]
SCO
[12] 05-Mar-2004 Plaintiff's Memorandum in support of [11-1] motion to remand (blk) [note there is a mistake in sentence two, which says SCO would prefer federal court. They meant Novell.] [Text] SCO
[13] 05-Mar-2004 Memorandum by SCO Grp in opposition to [2-1] motion to dismiss (blk) [Text] SCO
[14] 16-Mar-2004 Stipulation by Novell Inc, SCO Grp to extend time for Novell to file reply memo in support of its motion to dismiss up to and including 19-Mar-2004 (blk) [Referenced by [15].] SCO/
Novell
[15] 17-Mar-2004 Order granting [14-1] stipulation motion to extend time for Novell to file reply memo in support of its motion to dismiss up to and including 19-Mar-2004 signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball, 17-Mar-2004 cc:atty (blk) [Text] Court
[16] 18-Mar-2004 Stipulation by SCO Grp, Novell Inc to extend time for Novell to file opposition memo re: remand motion up to and including 26-Mar-2004 (blk) [Referenced by [17].] [Text] SCO/
Novell
[17] 19-Mar-2004 Order granting [16-1] stipulation motion to extend time for Novell to file opposition memo re: remand motion up to and including 26-Mar-2004 signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball, 19-Mar-2004 cc:atty (blk) Court
[18] 19-Mar-2004 Reply by Novell Inc to response to [2-1] motion to dismiss (blk) [Original] Novell
[19] 23-Mar-2004 Reply by Novell Inc to response to [2-1] motion to dismiss (blk) [Modified] [Text] Novell
[20] 26-Mar-2004 Memorandum by Novell Inc in opposition to [11-1] motion to remand (alt) [Article]
[Text]
Novell
[21] 07-Apr-2004 Reply by SCO Grp to response to [11-1] motion to remand (blk) [Article]
[Text]
SCO
[22] 07-Apr-2004 Exhibit No. 1 filed by plaintiff SCO Grp Re: [11-1] motion to remand (blk) [Article] SCO
[23] 09-Apr-2004 Notice of Hearing filed: Motion hearing set for 3:00 p.m. on 11-May-2004 for [11-1] motion to remand To be held before Judge Dale A. Kimball cc:atty (Ntc generated by: DAK, KJ.) (jmr) [Article] Court
[24] 12-Apr-2004 Amended Notice of Hearing filed: Motion hearing set for 3:00 11-May-2004 for [11-1] motion to remand, set for 3:00 11-May-2004 for [2-1] motion to dismiss To be held before Judge Kimball cc:atty (Ntc generated by: clerk) (blk) [Article] Court
[25] 04-May-2004 Motion and Order signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball, 30-Apr-2004 Granting motion/PHV for Attorney Scott E. Gant on behalf of plaintiff SCO Grp cc:attys (blk) Court
[26] 11-May-2004 Minute entry: Motion hearing held for [11-1] motion to remand, held for [2-1] motion to dismiss [11-1] motion to remand taken under advisement, [2-1] motion to dismiss taken under advisement; Judge: DAK Court Reporter: Kelly Hicken Court Deputy: Kim Jones (kj). [Article, Groklaw's Reports from the Hearing, Transcript as alternate PDF, Article. Transcript [584].] [Part-1]
[Part-2]
Court
[27] 09-June-2004 Motion and Order signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball, 09-Jun-2004 Granting motion/PHV for Attorney Johnathan E. Mansfield on behalf of defendant Novell Inc cc:attys (blk) Court
[28] 09-June-2004 Motion and Order signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball, 09-Jun-2004 Granting motion/PHV for Attorney Maame A.F. Ewusi-Mensah on behalf of defendant Novell Inc cc:attys (blk) Court
[29] 09-June-2004 Memorandum Decision denying [11-1] motion to remand, granting in part, denying in part [2-1] motion to dismiss: Dft's Motion to Dismiss is denied as to pla's pleading of falsity and granted as to pla's pleading of special damages. Pla is granted 30 days from the date of this order to amend signed by Dale A. Kimball cc:atty (blk) [Article]
[Text]
Court
[30] 06-July-2004 Motion and Order signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball, Granting motion/PHV for Attorney Robert Silver on behalf of plaintiff SCO Grp. [Alternate [PDF]] [Article] Court
[31] 09-July-2004 Amended Complaint by The SCO Group Amends [31-1] Amended Complaint; jury demand [Docket indicates this is the Second Amended Complaint, but it is actually the first. The second and final is docket number [96].] [Comparative [Chart] [00]/[31], Comparative [chart] [31]/[78]] [Referenced by [35].] [Article]
[Article]
SCO
[32] 26-July-2004 Stipulation by SCO Grp, Novell Inc Stip to extend time up to 06-Aug-2004 for Novell to answer or otherwise respond to pla's amended complaint (jmr) [Referenced by [33].] [Article] SCO/
Novell
[33] 26-July-2004 Order granting [32-1] stipulation motion to extend time up to 06-Aug-2004 for Novell to answer or otherwise respond to pla's amended complaint signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball, 26-Jul-2004 cc:atty. (jmr) [Article] Court
[34] 30-July-2004 Motion and Order signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball, 29-Jul-2004 Granting motion/PHV for Attorney David E. Melaugh on behalf of defendant Novell Inc cc:attys (blk) Court
[35] 06-Aug-2004 Motion by Novell Inc to dismiss the Amended Complaint [31] (blk)
[Referenced by [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [44] [52] [56] [57] [60] [61] [62] [67] [72] [75].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[36] 06-Aug-2004 Ex parte motion by Novell Inc for leave to file overlength memorandum in support of motion to dismiss [35-1] (blk) [Referenced by [39].] [Article] Novell
[37] 06-Aug-2004 Declaration of Bruce Lowry Re: [35-1] motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint (blk) [Alternate [PDF]. Exhibit G [PDF] [Text].] [Article] Novell
[38] 06-Aug-2004 Declaration of David E. Melaugh Re: [35-1] motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint (blk) [Alternate [PDF].] [Article] Novell
[39] 09-Aug-2004 Order granting [36-1] ex parte motion for leave to file overlength memorandum in support of motion to dismiss [35-1] signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball , 09-Aug-2004 cc:atty (blk) [Article] Court
[40] 09-Aug-2004 Memorandum by Novell Inc in support of [35-1] motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint (blk) [Article]
[Text]
Novell
[41] 11-Aug-2004 Notice of filing original declarations by Novell Inc (blk) Novell
[42] 23-Aug-2004 Stipulation by SCO Grp, Novell Inc to extend time for SCO to file memo in opposition to Moiton to Dismiss by 07-Sep-2004 (blk) [Referenced by [43].] SCO
[43] 24-Aug-2004 Order granting [42-1] stipulation motion to extend time for SCO to file memo in opposition to Moiton to Dismiss by 07-Sep-2004 signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball , 24-Aug-2004 cc:atty (blk) Court
[44] 30-Aug-2004 Notice of Hearing filed: Motion hearing set for 2:00 15-Sep-2004 for [35-1] motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint and motion for summary jgm To be held before Judge Kimball cc:atty (Ntc generated by: KJ) (blk) [Text] Court
[45] 01-Sep-2004 Notice of Vacated Hearing filed: Hearing set for 15-Sep-2004 at 2:00 p.m. set in error therefore is Vacated cc:atty (Ntc generated by: BK) (blk) [Article] Court
[46] 07-Sep-2004 Stipulation by SCO Grp to extend time for SCO to file a memorandum in opposition to Novell's Motion to Dismiss up to and including 24-Sep-2004 (blk) [Referenced by [47].] SCO
[47] 09-Sep-2004 Order granting [46-1] stipulation motion to extend time for SCO to file a memorandum in opposition to Novell's Motion to Dismiss up to and including 24-Sep-2004 signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball , 08-Sep-2004 cc:atty (blk) [Article] Court
[48] 24-Sep-2004 Stipulation by SCO Grp, Novell Inc to extend time to 01-Oct-2004 for SCO to resp to 2nd mot/dism (alt) [Referenced by [49].] [Text] SCO/
Novell
[49] 24-Sep-2004 Order granting [48-1] stipulation motion to extend time to 01-Oct-2004 for SCO to resp to 2nd mot/dism signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball, 24-Sep-2004 cc:atty (blk) [Article] Court
[50] 01-Oct-2004 Ex parte motion by SCO Grp for leave to file overlength opposition memo (blk) [Referenced by [51].] [Article] SCO
[--] 01-Oct-2004 Proposed document from SCO Grp entitled: Memo in opposition to Novell's motion to dismiss amended complaint (blk) [Article] SCO
[51] 04-Oct-2004 Order granting [50-1] ex parte motion for leave to file overlength opposition memo signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball, 04-Oct-2004 cc:atty (blk) [Article]
[Article]
Court
[52] 04-Oct-2004 Memorandum by SCO Grp in opposition to [35-1] motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint (blk) [There is a table of authorities with Johnson v. Tuff-N-Rumble Management; Lawrence Friedman v. Stacey Data Processing Services, Inc.; Miller v. Colorado Farms; Moore v. Ford; and United States Fidelity v. Jepson
52-1-1 1995 Bill of Sale [PDF], 52-4 [PDF] [Text]
]
[Article]
[Text]
SCO
[53] 06-Oct-2004 Stipulation by Novell Inc to extend time for Novell to file reply memorandum in support of second motion to dismiss up to and including 08-Nov-2004 (blk) [Referenced by [54].] [Article] Novell
[54] 07-Oct-2004 Order granting [53-1] stipulation motion to extend time for Novell to file reply memorandum in support of second motion to dismiss up to and including 08-Nov-2004 signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball , 07-Oct-2004 cc:atty (blk) [Article] Court
[55] 08-Nov-2004 Ex parte motion by Novell Inc for leave to file overlength memorandum (blk) [Referenced by [58].] Novell
[56] 08-Nov-2004 Reply by Novell Inc to response to [35-1] motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint (blk) [Text] Novell
[57] 08-Nov-2004 Declaration of Kellie Carlton Re: [35-1] motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint (blk) [Text] Novell
[58] 09-Nov-2004 Order granting [55-1] ex parte motion for leave to file overlength memorandum signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball, 09-Nov-2004 cc:atty (blk) Court
[59] 10-Nov-2004 Notice of filing by Novell Inc re: Original Declaration of Kellie Carlton in Support of Dft Novell's Motion to Dismiss, which contained a faxed signature page. (tsh) [Article] Novell
[60] 16-Nov-2004 Notice of Hearing filed : Motion hearing set for 3:00 20-Jan-2005 for [35-1] motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint To be held before Judge Kimball cc:atty (Ntc generated by: KJ) (blk) [Article]
[Article]
Court
[61] 28-Dec-2004 Notice of Hearing filed : Motion hearing reset for 3:00 01-Feb-2005 for [35-1] motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint To be held before Judge Kimball cc:atty (Ntc generated by: KJ) (blk) [Article] Court
[62] 25-Jan-2005 Notice of Amended Hearing Date: motion hearing reset to March 8, 2005 at 3 PM for [35-1] motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint To be held before Judge Kimball [Text] Court
[63] 28-Feb-2005 Motion by Novell Inc to continue hearing on motion to dismiss set for 08-Mar-2005
[Referenced by [64] [65] [67].]
[Article]
[Article]
Novell
[64] 28-Feb-2005 Declaration of Heather M. Sneddon Re: [63-1] motion to continue hearing on motion to dismiss set for 08-Mar-2005 [Article]
[Article]
Novell
[65] 28-Feb-2005 Declaration of Michael A. Jacobs Re: [63-1] motion to continue hearing on motion to dismiss set for 08-Mar-2005 [Article]
[Article]
Novell
[66] 01-Mar-2005 Stipulation by Novell Inc, SCO Grp to continue hearing re: Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint [Referenced by [67] [68].] [Article]
[Article]
SCO/
Novell
[67] 03-Mar-2005 Order granting [66-1] stipulation motion to continue hearing re: Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint, granting [63-1] motion to continue hearing on motion to dismiss set for 08-Mar-2005, Motion hearing set for 3:00 25-May-2005 for [35-1] motion to dismiss the Amended Complaint signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball , 02-Mar-2005 cc:atty [Article] Court
[68] 04-Mar-2005 Original Declaration of Michael A. Jacobs Re: [66-1] stipulation motion to continue hearing re: Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint Novell
[69] 04-Mar-2005 Notice of filing original declaration by Novell Inc Novell
[70] 23-May-2005 Motion/Order granting motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice for of Edward Normand for SCO Group. SCO
[71] 24-May-2005 Motion/Order granting motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice for of Sean Eskovitz for SCO Group. SCO
[72] 25-May-2005 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Dale A. Kimball : Motion Hearing held on 25-May-2005 re [35] Motion to Dismiss filed by Novell, Inc., motion taken under advisement. Attorney for Plaintiff: Edward Normand, Sean Eskovitz, Brent Hatch; Attorney for Defendant: Michael Jacobs, Thomas Karrenberg, John Mullen. [Groklaw's Reports from the Hearing, Transcript as PDF, Text and Text without line numbers. Minutes [583].] Court
[73] 07-June-2005 Motion/Order granting motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice for of Kenneth W. Brakebill for Novell, Inc. [Article]
[Article]
Novell
[74] 07-June-2005 Certificate of Service of motion/application for admission pro hac vice by Novell, Inc. Novell
[75] 27-June-2005 Order denying [35] Motion to Dismiss . Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 27-Jun-2005. [Text] Court
[76] 12-July-2005 Stipulation for extension of time to file Answer and Counterclaims in response to SCO's Amended Complaint by 29-Jul-2005 by Novell, Inc. [Referenced by [77].] [Article] SCO/
Novell
[77] 13-July-2005 Order approving [76] Stipulation for extension of time for Novell to answer Amended Complaint/file counterclaims by 29-Jul-2005 . Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 13-Jul-2005. Court
[78] 29-July-2005 Answer to Amended Complaint with Jury Demand, Counterclaim against SCO Group filed by Novell, Inc. [Article, Comparative [chart] [31]/[78], [Article], [Article].] [Referenced by [79].] [Article]
[Text]
Novell
[79] 17-Aug-2005 Stipulation/Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re [78] Answer to Amended Complaint, Counterclaim by 12-Sep-2005 filed by Counter Defendant SCO Group [Referenced by [80].] [Article] SCO
[80] 18-Aug-2005 Order granting [79] Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Answer deadline updated for SCO Group answer due 12-Sep-2005. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 18-Aug-2005. Court
[81] 12-Sep-2005 Answer to Counterclaim filed by SCO Group. [Comparative [chart.]] [Article]
[Text]
SCO
[82] 10-Nov-2005 Notice of Initial Pretrial Conference - The Attorneys Planning Meeting Report and Proposed Scheduling Order forms, available on the court web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov/documents/formpage.html, should be prepared 30 days before the Initial Pretrial Conference hearing date. The Court may enter a scheduling order and vacate the hearing if counsel (a) file a stipulated Attorneys Planning Meeting Report and (b) e-mail a Proposed Scheduling Order to ipt(AT)utd.uscourts.gov 30 days before the scheduled hearing.*** Initial Pretrial Conference set for 20-Dec-2005 01:30 PM in Room 477 before Magistrate Judge David Nuffer. (blk, ) [Referenced by [83].] [Article] Court
[83] 29-Nov-2005 Notice Attorney Report Reminder - Notice Reminder of Attorneys' Planning Meeting Report due five days from receipt of this notice re [82] Notice of Initial Pretrial Conference: (Notice generated by clerk)***The Attorneys Planning Meeting Report and Proposed Scheduling Order forms, available on the court web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov/documents/formpage.html, should be prepared 30 days before the Initial Pretrial Conference hearing date. The Court may enter a scheduling order and vacate the hearing if counsel (a) file a stipulated Attorneys Planning Meeting Report and (b) e-mail a Proposed Scheduling Order to ipt(AT)utd.uscourts.gov 30 days before the scheduled hearing.*** Initial Pretrial Conference set for 20-Dec-2005 01:30 PM in Room 477 before Magistrate Judge David Nuffer. (blk, ) (tsh, ) Court
[84] 01-Dec-2005 Attorney Planning Meeting Report [Text] Parties
[85] 06-Dec-2005 Scheduling Order: Initial Pretrial Conference vacated. Amended Pleadings due by 07-Mar-2006. Joinder of Parties due by 07-Mar-2006. Discovery due by 01-Nov-2006, 12-Jan-2007. Motions due by 26-Jan-2007. Final Pretrial Conference set for 06-Jun-2007 02:30 PM in Room 220 before Judge Dale A. Kimball. 21 day Jury Trial set for 25-Jun-2007 08:30 AM in Room 220 before Judge Dale A. Kimball. Signed by Judge David Nuffer on 06-Dec-2005. [article]
[Text]
Court
[86] 06-Dec-2005 Certificate of Service - Novell 1st Request for Documents [Article] Novell
[87] 14-Dec-2005 Certificate of service - Discovery - 2nd Req for Documents [Article] Novell
[88] 19-Dec-2005 Notice of Hearing: (Notice generated by Kim Jones) Telephone Conference set for 25-Jan-2006 02:30 PM in Room 220 before Judge Dale A. Kimball. (kmj, ) [Article] Court
[89] 30-Dec-2005 Motion to Amend/Correct, File Second Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibits A; B; C; D; E; F; and E-F )
[SCO's Proposed Second Amended Complaint, as text] [Referenced by [92] [93].]
[Text]
[Article]
SCO
[90] 30-Dec-2005 Certificate of Service - 1st Set of Interrogatories to SCO Group by Novell Novell
[91] 11-Jan-2006 SCO's Certificate of Service of SCO's First Request for Production of Documents and First Set of Interrogatories SCO
[--] 18-Jan-2006 Terminate Deadlines/Hearings - Docket Text: Deadlines/Hearings terminated: telephone conference re: scheduling trial date is stricken by stipulation of counsel. (kmj, ) [Article] Court
[92] 26-Jan-2006 Stipulation re: [89] SCO's Motion to Amend Amended Complaint [Article] SCO/Novell
[93] 26-Jan-2006 Order Granting [89] SCO's Motion to Amend Amended Complaint, signed January 26, 2006 by Judge Dale A. Kimball [Article] Court
[94] 3-Feb-2006 Certificate of Service re: Subpoena by Novell, Inc. Novell
[95] 03-Feb-2006 Certificate of Service re: Subpoena by Novell, Inc. Novell
[96] 06-Feb-2006 SCO's Second Amended Complaint with jury demand. [Alternate [PDF].] [Referenced by [31] [100].] [text] SCO
[97] 13-Feb-2006 Certificate of Service - re: discovery by Novell [Article] Novell
[98] 21-Feb-2006 Certificate of Service - re discovery by Novell, Inc. [Article] Novell
[99] 03-Mar-2006 Rule 26 Initial Disclosure by Novell [Article] Novell
[100] 20-Mar-2006 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer - Stipulation/Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer re [96] 2d Amended Complaint filed by Novell (Modified on 20-Mar-2006 by adding text - stipulation) [Article] Novell
[101] 22-Mar-2006 Certificate of Service - Re: Intitial Disclosures by SCO Group [Article] SCO
[102] 11-Apr-2006 Order that Novell may file, under seal, confidential exhibits to its Motion to Stay. [Kimball] - Novell, Inc.'s Subpoena in a civil Case (DataSafe, Inc.) Court
[103] 11-Apr-2006 Stipulation to file confidential exhibits under seal re: Motion to Stay by Novell, Inc. [Referenced by [112].] Novell
[104] 11-Apr-2006 Motion to Stay - Motion to Stay Claims Raising Issues Subject to Arbitration
[Referenced by [105] [107] [131] [135] [136] [139].]
[article] Novell
[105] 11-Apr-2006 Sealed Document - Memo in Support re [104] Motion to Stay filed by Defendant Novell, Inc. [Referenced by [106] [113].] Novell
[106] 11-Apr-2006 Redacted Document - Redaction to [105] - Sealed Document Memo in Support of Motion to Stay by Defendant Novell, Inc. [article] Novell
[107] 11-Apr-2006 Sealed Document - Declaration of Michael A. Jacobs re [104] Motion to Stay filed by Defendant Novell Inc. (Attachments: exhibits 1 and 2) [Referenced by [108] [114].] [Article; Text] Novell
[108] 11-Apr-2006 Redacted Document - Redaction to [107] Sealed Document: Declaration of Michael A. Jacobs in Support of Motion to Stay by Defendant Novell, Inc. [Alternate PDF] Novell
[109] 11-Apr-2006 Motion for a More Definite Statement of SCO's Unfair Competition Cause of Action filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.
[Referenced by [110] [111] [129] [133] [135] [136] [252].]
[article] Novell
[110] 11-Apr-2006 Memorandum in Support of Motion re: [109] Motion for a More Definite Statement [text] Novell
[111] 11-Apr-2006 Declaration of Kennth W. Brakebill re [109] Motion for More Definite Statement [text] Novell
[112] 11-Apr-2006 Certificate of Service by Novell, Inc. re [103] Stipulation) Novell
[113] 11-Apr-2006 Certificate of Service by Novell, Inc. re: [105] Sealed Document Memo in Support of Motion to Stay Novell
[114] 11-Apr-2006 Certificate of Service by Novell, Inc. re [107] Sealed Document: Declaration of Michael A. Jacobs re: Motion to Stay Novell
[115] 11-Apr-2006 Answer to SCO's Second Amended Complaint and Counterclaims [text] Novell
[116] 17-Apr-2006 Notice of Third-Party Subpoena (Kenneth Brakebill) [article] Novell
[117] 27-Apr-2006 Certificate of Service re: Subpoena in a Civil Case (Recall) and Declaration of Service by Novell, Inc. Novell
[118] 01-May-2006 Stipulation by SCO, Novell giving SCO until May 19, 2006 to file a response to Novell's Motion to Stay Claims Raising Issues Subject to Arbitration and Novell's Motion for a More Definite Statement of SCO's Unfair Competition Cause of Action. SCO
[119] 02-May-2006 Order on Stipulation, giving SCO until May 19, 2006 to reply to Novell's Motion to Stay Claims [Article] Court
[120] 04-May-2006 Novell Inc.'s Answer to SCO's Second Amended Complaint with Counterclaims [Alternate [PDF].] [Text]
[ Chart]
Novell
[121] 01-May-2006 SCO's Reply to Novell's Counterclaims [Article] [Article]
[Chart]
SCO
[122] 26-May-2006 SCO's Memorandum in Opposition to Novell's Motion to Stay Claims Raising Issues Subject to Arbitration -
# (1) Exhibit 1 [Text] - Scheduling Order and Order Vacating Hearing; # (2) Exhibit 2 [Text] - Novell's 1st & 2nd Sets of Interrogatories, Doc Requests & subpoenas; # (3) Exhibit 3 [Text] - Plaintiff's First Request for Documents and First Set of Interogatories; # (4) Exhibit 4 - Cover letters as SCO delivers CDs of discovery materials; # (5) Exhibit 5 - Attorney Correspondence - Emails regarding protective order language; # (6) Exhibit 6 - Letter from Morrison & Foerster's David E. Melaugh to Boies Schiller's Edward Normand, dated May 27, 2006 regarding discovery; # (7) Exhibit 7 - SCO's CEO Darl McBride's May 12, 2003 letter to Novell CEO Jack Messman; # (8) Exhibit 8 [Text] - Stipulated Protective Order
[Article]
[Text]
SCO
[123] 01-May-2006 Ex Parte Motion for Leave to File Overlength Memorandum [Referenced by [125].] [Article] SCO
[124] 26-May-2006 SCO's Memorandum in Opposition to Novell's Motion for a More Definite Statement [Article] SCO
[125] 31-May-2006 Order granting [123] Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages Court
[126] 09-June-2006 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney Mark R. Clements [Referenced by [128].] SCO
[127] 12-June-2006 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Memoranda in Support of Novell, Inc.'s Motions to Stay [Referenced by [129].] Novell
[128] 13-June-2006 Order granting [126] Motion to Withdraw as Attorney Mark R. Clements Court
[129] 13-June-2006 Order granting [127] Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re [109] Motion for More Definite Statement [Article] Court
[130] 19-June-2006 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages in Reply in Support of Novell, Inc.'s Motion to Stay Claims Raising Issues Subject to Arbitration. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [134].] [Article] Novell
[131] 19-June-2006 Reply to Response to Motion re [104] Motion to Stay Claims Raising Issues Subject to Arbitration [Referenced by [132].] [Article] Novell
[132] 19-June-2006 Declaration of David E. Melaugh re [131] Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion to Stay
(Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - SCO Source Log in SCO v. Novell [Article], # (2) Exhibit 2 - SCO Source Log in SCO v. IBM, # (3) Exhibit 3 - SCO's First Requests for Production and Interrogatories, # (4) Exhibit 4 - Attorneys' Planning Meeting Report)
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[133] 19-June-2006 Reply to Response to Motion re [109] Motion for More Definite Statement of SCO's Unfair Competition Cause of Action; Exhibit A - Coexist, LLP v. Cafepress.com, et al. [Text] Novell
[134] 20-June-2006 Order granting [130] Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages Court
[135] 20-June-2006 Notice of Hearing on Motion re: [109] Motion for More Definite Statement, [104] Motion to Stay. Hearing set for 17-July-2006 [Article] Court
[136] 17-Jul-2006 Order on Motion for More Definite Statement
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Dale A. Kimball : Motion Hearing held on 17-Jul-2006 re [104] Motion to Stay filed by Novell, Inc., and [109] Motion for More Definite Statement filed by Novell, Inc.. Mr. Jacobs advised Court that [109] Motion for More Definite Statement is moot as Plaintiff will be amending complaint, and that arbitration will begin shortly as arbitrators are being chosen at this time. The Court heard the arguments of counsel as to the Motion to Stay and took the motion under advisement. Written Order to follow oral order: no. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, William Dzurilla and Brent Hatch, Attorney for Defendant: Michael Jacobs and Thomas Karrenburg. (Court Reporter: Becky Janke.) [Groklaw's Reports from the Hearing. Transcript as [PDF] and [Text]. Transcript [579] [586].]
[Article] Court
[137] 31-July-2006 Stipulated Motion for Protective Order [Referenced by [138].] [Article] Novell
[138] 02-Aug-2006 Stipulated Protective Order granting [137] Motion for Protective Order Court
[139] 21-Aug-2006 Order Granting In Part [104] Novell's Motion to Stay Claims Raising Issues Subject to Arbitration [Referenced by [635].] [Text] Court
[140] 21-Sep-2006 Stipulation and Motion for Leave to File Amended Counterclaims, Novell Inc.'s Amended Counterclaims, Proposed Order [Referenced by [141].] [Text]
[Chart]
Novell
[141] 22-Sep-2006 Order Granting [140] Motion for Leave to File Amended Counterclaims [Article] Court
[142] 24-Sep-2006 Amended Counterclaims [Article] Novell
[143] 27-Sep-2006 Certificate of Service of Novell's Second set of Interrogatories and Third set of Requests for Production [Article] Novell
[144] 29-Sep-2006 Certificate of Service of Novell's First Set of Requests for Admission [Article] Novell
[145] 29-Sep-2006 Certificate of Service of Novell's Third Set of Interrogatories [Article] Novell
[146] 29-Sep-2006 Certificate of Service of Novell's Fourth set of Requests for Production [Article] Novell
[147] 29-Sep-2006 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction. [See [377] - Order.]
[Referenced by [148] [149] [150] [151] [154] [155] [157] [178] [180] [182] [183] [197] [198] [199] [201] [205] [209] [227] [326] [340].]
[Text] Novell
[148] 29-Sep-2006 Memorandum in Support of [147] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction [Redaction to [155] pursuant to the August 2, 2006 Stipulated Protective Order] [Referenced by [149].] [Text] Novell
[149] 29-Sep-2006 Declaration of Joseph A. LaSala, Jr. re [148] Memorandum in Support of [147] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction
Exhibit 1 - July 11, 2003 Novell Letter
Exhibit 2 - July 17, 2003 SCO Letter
[Article] Novell
[150] 02-Oct-2006 [Sealed] Declaration of Michael A. Jacobs re [147] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction
[Referenced by [151] [152] [153].]
[Article] Novell
[151] 02-Oct-2006 Redaction to [150] Sealed Declaration of Michael A. Jacobs in support of [147] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction [Referenced by [153].] [Article] Novell
[152] 02-Oct-2006 Certificate of Service re [150] Declaration of Michael A. Jacobs [Article] Novell
[153] 02-Oct-2006 Notice of Conventional Filing of [150] Declaration of Michael A. Jacobs re [151] Redacted Document [Article] Novell
[154] 02-Oct-2006 Certificate of Service of Memorandum in Support of [147] Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction [Filed Under Seal] [Article] Novell
[155] 02-Oct-2006 [Sealed] Memorandum in Support of [147] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction [Note redacted as [148].] Novell
[156] 04-Oct-2006 Motion for Expedited Stay or Continuance to Respond to Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction, and to Extend Fact Discovery [Referenced by [162].] [Text] SCO
[157] 08-Oct-2006 Errata to Memorandum in Support of [147] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction Novell
[158] 16-Oct-2006 Reply to Novell's Amended Counterclaims [Text]
[Chart]
SCO
[159] 18-Oct-2006 Opposition to SCO's Motion for Expedited Stay or Continuance
Exhibit A emails between between Ken Brakebill and Ted Normand
Exhibit B Plaintiff's First Request for Production of Documents and First Set of Interrogatories
Exhibit C Novell's 2nd Set of Requests for Production to The SCO Group
Exhibit D Novell's 1st Set of Interrogatories to the SCO Group
Exhibit E email from Ken Brakebill to Ted Normand with a proposed Stipulation attached
[Text] Novell
[160] 23-Oct-2006 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Stuart H. Singer (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [163].] [Article] SCO
[161] 23-Oct-2006 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of William Dzurilla (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [163].] [Article] SCO
[162] 24-Oct-2006 Order granting in part and denying in part SCO's Motion [156] for Expedited Stay or Continuance [Text] Court
[163] 25-Oct-2006 Order on Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice - Order granting [160] Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Stuart H. Singer for SCO Group, granting [161] Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of William Dzurilla for SCO Group. Court
[164] 06-Nov-2006 Certificate of Service - Novell's Response to SCO's Second set of Requests for Production and Second set of Interogatories Novell
[165] 07-Nov-2006 Expedited Motion to Compel Production of Deposition Transcripts and Exhibits from SCO v. IBM
[Referenced by [166] [167] [170] [177] [193].]
[Article] Novell
[166] 07-Nov-2006 Memorandum in Support of [165] Expedited Motion to Compel Production of Deposition Transcripts and Exhibits from SCO v. IBM [Article] Novell
[167] 07-Nov-2006 Declaration of Kenneth Brakebill in Support of [165] Expedited Motion to Compel Production of Deposition Transcripts and Exhibits from SCO v. IBM.
Exhibit A - 3 emails between Ted Normand and Kenneth Brakebill and one going the other way, Oct. 14, 16 and 17, 2005
Exhibit B - Email from David Marriott to Kenneth Brakebill giving IBM permission to share discovery, Feb. 8, 2006
Exhibit C - Scheduling Order
Exhibit D - Novell's 1st Set of Requests for Production
Exhibit E - email from Brakebill to Normand attaching a copy of the material in Exhibits A and B as a reminder
Exhibit F - Nov. 2 and 3, 2006 emails between Brakebill and Normand
Exhibit G - SCO's Responses and Objections to Novell's 1st Set of Interrogatories and Second Set of Requests for Production
Exhibit H - Novell's Second Set of Requests for Production.
[Article] Novell
[168] 09-Nov-2006 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells under 28:636 (b)(1)(A), Magistrate to hear and determine all nondispositive pretrial matters. [Article] Court
[169] 14-Nov-2006 Notice of Filing with attached letter [Article] Novell
[170] 27-Nov-2006 Memorandum in Opposition to Novell's [165] Expedited Motion to Compel Production of Deposition Transcripts and Exhibits from SCO v. IBM [Text] SCO
[171] 01-Dec-2006 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief. [See [377] - Order.]
[Referenced by [172] [173] [174] [175] [176] [191] [192] [196] [200] [202] [207] [213] [227] [235] [236] [237] [240] [265] [326] [340] [342] [345] [356].]
[Text] Novell
[172] 01-Dec-2006 Redacted Memorandum [175] in Support re [171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief [Article]
[Text]
Novell
[173] 01-Dec-2006 Redacted Declaration [176] of Kenneth W. Brakebill re [171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief
(Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 Part 1 (pp. 1-48 of Novell-Santa Cruz Asset Purchase Agreement);
# (2) Exhibit 1 Part 2 (continuation pp. 49-97, schedules and amendments);
# (3) Exhibit 2, 3 , (the Novell-Santa Cruz Operating Agreement and Amendment 1 to the APA);
# (4) Exhibit 4-8 (Amendment 2 to the APA, and IBM-AT&T contracts);
# 5 Exhibit 12-15 and 17 - (AT&T and Novell/Santa Cruz contracts with IBM, including the IBM buyout);
# (6) Exhibit 23 (SCO Group's 10K for the period ending October 31, 2003);
# (7) Exhibits 24-27 (SCO-IBM/Sequent correspondence);
# (8) Exhibit 28 Exhibits 28-41, (part of the deposition of Jack Messman and Novell-SCO correspondence);
# (9) Exhibit 42 - Part 1 (Caldera 10K for the period ending October 31, 2002, part 1);
# (10) Exhibit 42 - Part 2 (10K continued);
# (11) Exhibits 43-45 (part of Ed Chatlos deposition)
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[174] 01-Dec-2006 Notice of Conventional Filing of [sealed] Memorandum and Declaration of Kenneth W. Brakebill in Support of Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Its Fourth Claim for Relief re [171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief [Article] Novell
[175] 01-Dec-2006 [Sealed] Memorandum in Support re [171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief [Note redacted as [172].] Novell
[176] 01-Dec-2006 [Sealed] Declaration of Kenneth W. Brakebill re [171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief [Note redacted as [173].] Novell
[177] 11-Dec-2006 Reply in Support of Novell's Expedited Motion [165] to Compel Production of Deposition Transcripts and Exhibits from SCO v. IBM [Text] Novell
[178] 12-Dec-2006 Notice of Conventional Filing of Memorandum [183] in Opposition to Novell's [147] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction and in Support of SCO's Cross Motion [180] for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment SCO
[179] 12-Dec-2006 Notice of Conventional Filing of Declaration [184] of Brent O. Hatch SCO
[180] 12-Dec-2006 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Counterclaims. [See [147] Novell's Motion, [377] - Order.]
[Referenced by [178] [182] [183] [209] [214] [220] [221] [227] [231] [232] [233] [326].]
[Article] SCO
[181] 12-Dec-2006 Stipulation and Motion for Leave to File Memorandum in Opposition with Text of Proposed Order [Referenced by [208].] [Article] SCO
[182] 12-Dec-2006 Ex Parte Motion for Leave to File Overlength Memorandum in Opposition to Novell's [147] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction and in Support of SCO's Cross Motion [180] for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment with Text of Proposed Order [Referenced by [225].] [Article] SCO
[183] 12-Dec-2006 [Sealed] Memorandum in Opposition re [147] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction. Note: Exhibits are oversized and not attached in the pdf image. [Note redacted as [209] which tells us it is also in support of Cross Motion [180].]
[Referenced by [178] [197] [198] [199] [201].]
[Article] SCO
[184] 12-Dec-2006 [Sealed] Declaration of Brent O. Hatch
[Referenced by [179] [185] [186] [187] [188] [189] [190].]
SCO
[185] 12-Dec-2006 [Sealed] Exhibits 1-20 re [184] Sealed Declaration of Brent O. Hatch SCO
[186] 12-Dec-2006 [Sealed] Exhibits 21-27 re [184] Sealed Declaration of Brent O. Hatch SCO
[187] 12-Dec-2006 [Sealed] Exhibits 28 re [184] Sealed Declaration of Brent O. Hatch SCO
[188] 12-Dec-2006 [Sealed] Exhibits 20-32 re [184] Sealed Declaration of Brent O. Hatch SCO
[189] 12-Dec-2006 [Sealed] Exhibits 33-46 re [184] Sealed Declaration of Brent O. Hatch SCO
[190] 13-Dec-2006 [Sealed] Electronic Exhibit 26 (cd) re [184] Sealed Declaration of Brent O. Hatch filed SCO
[191] 18-Dec-2006 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to [171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief with Text of Proposed [Referenced by [192].] SCO/
Novell
[192] 19-Dec-2006 Order Granting [191] Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re [171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief Court
[193] 03-Jan-2007 Notice of Hearing on Motion re: [165] Motion to Compel Production of Deposition Transcripts and Exhibits from SCO v. IBM : Motion Hearing set for 11-Jan-2007 10:30 am in Room 436 before Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells [Article] Court
[194] 04-Jan-2007 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Devan Padmanabhan, Registration fee $ 15, receipt number 4681015433. (Attachments: # (1) Application for Admission, # (2) e-filing Registration Form, # (3) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [204].] [Article] SCO
[195] 04-Jan-2007 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of John J. Brogan, Registration fee $ 15, receipt number 4681015434. (Attachments: # (1) Application for Admission, # (2) e-filing Registration Form, # (3) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [203].] [Article] SCO
[196] 08-Jan-2007 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to [171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)
[Referenced by [200] [202] [207].]
[Article]
[Text]
SCO
[197] 08-Jan-2007 Ex Parte Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages (Overlength Reply to SCO's [183] Opposition to Novell's Motion [147] for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction). (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [206].] [Article] Novell
[198] 08-Jan-2007 Redacted Reply [205] to SCO's [183] Opposition to Novell's Motion [147] for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A) [Referenced by [199].] [Text] Novell
[199] 08-Jan-2007 Declaration of Heather M. Sneddon re [198] Redacted Document (Reply to SCO's [183] Opposition to Novell's Motion [147] for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, Pt. 1 # (2) Exhibit 1, Pt. 2 # (3) Exhibit 1, Pt. 3 # (4) Exhibit 2, Pt. 1 # (5) Exhibit 2, Pt. 2) [Article] Novell
[200] 09-Jan-2007 Memorandum in Opposition re [196] Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to [171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief [Text] Novell
[201] 09-Jan-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing of Novell's [Sealed] Reply to SCO's [183] Opposition to Novell's Motion [147] for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction [Article]
[202] 09-Jan-2007 Reply to Response to Motion re [196] Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to [171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief. [Text] SCO
[203] 08-Jan-2007 Order granting [195] Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of John J. Brogan for SCO Group. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 05-Jan-2007. [Article] Court
[204] 08-Jan-2007 Order granting [194] Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Devan V. Padmanabhan for SCO Group. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 05-Jan-2007. [Article] Court
[205] 09-Jan-2007 [Sealed] Reply to SCO's Opposition re [147] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction [Note redacted as [198].] Novell
[206] 10-Jan-2007 Order granting [197] Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Court
[207] 10-Jan-2007 Order granting [196] Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re [171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief Replies due by 17-Jan-2007. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 09-Jan-2007. [Article] Court
[--] 11-Jan-2007 Terminate Deadlines/Hearings. Parties notified the Court they have resolved Novell's [165] Motion to Compel. Hearing stricken for 11-Jan-2007. Parties will file stipulation. [Article] Court
[208] 12-Jan-2007 Order granting [181] Motion for Leave to File. [Article] Court
[209] 12-Jan-2007 Redacted [183] Memorandum in Opposition to Novell's [147] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction and In Support of SCO's [180] Cross Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment. (Attachments: # (1) Part 2 # (2) Appendix A) [Article]
[Article]
SCO
[210] 17-Jan-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing of Novell's Opposition to SCO's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Filed Under Seal), Declaration of Heather M. Sneddon (Filed Under Seal), and Novell's Response to SCO's Statement of Facts (Filed Under Seal) [Article] Novell
[211] 17-Jan-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing of (1)SCO's Memorandum in Opposition to Novell's Motion for Partial Summary on its Fourth Counterclaim for Relief, and in Support of SCO's Motion for Summary Judgment (2) Declaration of Brent O. Hatch [Article] SCO
[212] 17-Jan-2007 Motion for Leave to File Over Length Memorandum in Opposition to Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its Fourth Counterclaim for Relief, and for SCO's Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [225].] [Article] SCO
[213] 17-Jan-2007 [Sealed] Memorandum in Opposition to [171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief [Note redacted as [265] which tells us it is also in support of Cross Motion [224].] [Referenced by [298].] [Article] SCO
[214] 17-Jan-2007 [Sealed] Memorandum in Support re [180] Cross Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Counterclaims [Article] SCO
[215] 17-Jan-2007 [Sealed] Declaration of Brent O. Hatch
[Referenced by [216] [217] [218] [219].]
[Article] SCO
[216] 17-Jan-2007 [Sealed] Exhibits 10-43 re [215] Sealed Declaration of Brent Hatch [Article] SCO
[217] 17-Jan-2007 [Sealed] Exhibits 35 re [215] Sealed Declaration of Brent Hatch [Article] SCO
[218] 17-Jan-2007 [Sealed] Exhibits 44-56 re [215] Sealed Declaration of Brent Hatch [Article]
[219] 17-Jan-2007 [Sealed] Exhibits 57-63 re [215] Sealed Declaration of Brent Hatch [Article]
[220] 17-Jan-2007 [Sealed] Response to Statement of Facts in [180] Cross Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Counterclaims [Article] Novell
[221] 16-Jan-2007 [Sealed] Opposition to [180] Cross Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Counterclaims [Referenced by [222] [223].] [Article] Novell
[222] 16-Jan-2007 [Sealed] Declaration of Heather M. Sneddon re [221] Sealed Opposition to Cross-Motion. Part 1 of 2. [Article] Novell
[223] 16-Jan-2007 [Sealed] Declaration of Heather M. Sneddon re [221] Sealed Opposition to Cross-Motion. Part 2 of 2. [Article] Novell
[224] 18-Jan-2007 Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Counterclaim [See [377] - Order.]
[Referenced by [213] [227] [240] [246] [251] [265] [298] [326] [342] [345] [356].]
[Article] SCO
[225] 19-Jan-2007 Order granting [182] Motion for Leave to File; granting [212] Motion for Leave to File. Court
[226] 23-Jan-2007 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Sashi Bach Boruchow, receipt number 4681015764. (Attachments: # (1) Application for Admission# (2) Text of Proposed Order # (3) E-Filing Registration Form) [Referenced by [228].] SCO
[227] 23-Jan-2007 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Dale A. Kimball : Motion Hearing held on 23-Jan-2007 re Novell's [147] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction, SCO's [180] Cross Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Counterclaims, SCO's [224] Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Counterclaim, Novell's [171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief. After hearing argument from counsel, the court takes this matter under advisement. [Groklaw's Reports from the Hearing, Transcript: PDF, Text. Transcript [577] [587].] Court
[228] 25-Jan-2007 Order granting [226] Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Sashi Bach Boruchow for SCO Group. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 24-Jan-2007. Court
[229] 25-Jan-2007 Telephone Conference. Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Dale A. Kimball: Telephone Conference held on 25-Jan-2007. After hearing from counsel, the court will allow each side to designate 3 or 4 additional depositions by 29-Jan, to be taken by 2-Mar-2007. Each side will also be allowed to designate one more deposition by 09-Feb-2007 to be taken by 02-Mar-2007. Attorney for Plaintiff: Mark James, Edward Normand, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Ken Brakebill, Esq. Court Reporter: Kelly Hicken. [Transcript [560].] [Article] Court
[230] 30-Jan-2007 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply with Text of Proposed Order. [Referenced by [232].] SCO
[231] 31-Jan-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing of SCO's Reply Memorandum in Support of Its Cross Motion [180] for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Counterclaims. SCO
[232] 01-Feb-2007 Order granting [230] Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re [180] Cross Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Counterclaims. Replies due by 31-Jan-2007. Court
[233] 31-Jan-2007 [Sealed] Reply Memorandum in Support re [180] Cross Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Counterclaims (Oversized - exhibits not attached as an image.) SCO
[234] 09-Feb-2007 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Grant L. Kim, receipt number 4681016160. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A -- Application# (2) Exhibit B -- Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [238].] [Article] Novell
[235] 12-Feb-2007 Ex Parte (Not Sealed) Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages (Novell's Reply to SCO's Opposition to Novell's [171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its Fourth Claim for Relief) with Text of Proposed Order. [Article] Novell
[236] 12-Feb-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing of Novell's Reply to SCO's Opposition to Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its Fourth Claim for Relief [Filed Under Seal]. re [171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief. [Article] Novell
[237] 12-Feb-2007 [Sealed] Reply to Response regarding [171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief. [Article] Novell
[238] 13-Feb-2007 Order granting [234] Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Grant L. Kim for Novell. [Article] Court
[239] 21-Feb-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing of Novell's Opposition to SCO's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief; Declaration of Heather M. Sneddon in Support; Novell's Response to SCO's Statement of Facts. [Article] Novell
[240] 20-Feb-2007 [Sealed] Opposition to Cross Motion re [171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief [Note: the docket says this is in opposition to [171], but SCO's cross-motion, which Novell opposes, is likely [224]] [Referenced by [241].] Novell
[241] 20-Feb-2007 [Sealed] Declaration of Heather Sneddon re [240] Sealed Opposition to Cross-Motion Novell
[242] 21-Feb-2007 [Sealed] Response to SCO's Statement of Facts in Support of its Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on Novells Fourth Claim for Relief. (Attachments: # (1) 2nd half of document) Novell
[243] 02-Mar-2007 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery Docket Text: Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [244].] [Article] Novell
[--] 05-Mar-2007 Set/Reset Deadlines: Motions due by 13-Apr-2007. Court
[244] 05-Mar-2007 Order RE Scheduling granting [243] Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery. Court
[245] 09-Mar-2007 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Novell's Opposition to SCO's Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [246].] [Article]
[Text]
SCO
[246] 12-Mar-2007 Order granting [245] Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re [224] Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Counterclaim. Replies due by 16-Mar-2007. [Article] Court
[247] 16-Mar-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing of Reply Memorandum in Support of its Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novells Fourth Counterclaim and Exhibits Attached Thereto; Declaration of Mark F. James [Article] SCO
[248] 16-Mar-2007 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [249].] [Article] SCO
[249] 19-Mar-2007 Order granting [248] Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. [Article] Court
[250] 20-Mar-2007 Stipulated Motion to Amend/Correct SCO's Fifth Claim for Relief. (Attachments: # (1) Proposed Order [Referenced by [252].] [Article] Novell
[251] 16-Mar-2007 [Sealed] Reply Memorandum in Support re [224] Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Counterclaim [Note redacted as [266].] SCO
[252] 22-Mar-2007 Order on [250] Motion to Amend/Correct Second Amended Complaint. It is hereby ordered that Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant SCO's Second Amended Complaint is deemed amended to reflect that SCO's Fifth Claim for Relief arises out of Utah statutory and/or common law and Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff Novell's Motion [109] for a More Definite Statement of SCO's Unfair Competition Cause of Action is mooted. [Article] Court
[253] 23-Mar-2007 Notice From the Clerk's Office: From this day forward, sealed submission in this case will not be scanned for internal court use but will be maintained in the court's sealed room not to be accessed except by court personnel. [Article] Court
[254] 26-Mar-2007 Stipulated Motion for Protective Order (Entry of Stipulated Addendum). (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order [As text]) [Article] Novell
[255] 28-Mar-2007 Stipulated Addendum to Protective Order. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 27-Mar-2007. Court
[256] 30-Mar-2007 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Outstanding Fact Discovery. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [257].] [Article] Novell
[257] 03-Apr-2007 Order granting [256] Motion for Extension of Time to complete all outstanding fact discovery. The parties' 17-Sep-2007 trial date will not change. Court
[258] 09-Apr-2007 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's First, Second and Fifth Causes of Action and for Summary Judgment on Novell's First Counterclaim. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [See [377] - Order.]
[Referenced by [259] [292] [298] [326] [342] [345] [346] [356].]
[Text] SCO
[259] 09-Apr-2007 Memorandum in Support of Motion [258] for Summary Judgment (Partial) on SCO's First, Second and Fifth Causes of Action and for Summary Judgment on Novell's First Counterclaim. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-D: Unpublished Cases) [Referenced by [260] [298].] [Text] SCO
[260] 09-Apr-2007 Declaration of Edward Normand re [259] Memorandum in Support of Motion.
(Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 Part 1, # (2) Exhibit 1, part 2, # (3) Exhibit 1, part 3, # (4) Exhibit 1, part 4, # (5) Exhibit 2-9, # (6) Exhibit 10-20, # (7) Exhibit 21-27, # (8) Exhibit 28-31, # (9) Exhibit 32-34, # (10) Exhibit 35 Part 1, # (11) Exhibit 35 part 2, # (12) Exhibit 36-41)
[Article] SCO
[261] 09-Apr-2007 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motions with Text of Proposed Order. [Referenced by [263].] [Article] Novell
[262] 10-Apr-2007 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of David Boies. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A: Application for Admission, # (2) Exhibit B: ECF Registration, # (3) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [264].] [Article] SCO
[263] 10-Apr-2007 Order granting [261] Motion for Extension of Time to Extend Dispositive Motion Deadline to April 20, 2007. [Article] Court
[264] 11-Apr-2007 Order granting [262] Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of David Boies for SCO Group. [Article] Court
[265] 16-Apr-2007 SCO's Redacted Memorandum [213] in Opposition to Novell's Motion [171] for Partial Summary Judgment on its Fourth Counterclaim for Relief, and In Support of SCO's Cross Motion [224] for Partial Summary Judgment. (Attachments: # (1) Part 2, # (2) Part 3, # (3) Appendix A) [Text] SCO
[266] 16-Apr-2007 Redaction to SCO's Reply Memorandum [251] In Support of its Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Counterclaim. [Text] SCO
[267] 19-Apr-2007 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Complete All Expert Discovery with Text of Proposed Order [Referenced by [269].] Novell
[268] 19-Apr-2007 Stipulated Motion for Protective Order (Entry of Second Stipulated Addendum). with Text of Proposed Order. [Referenced by [270].] Novell
[269] 20-Apr-2007 Order granting [267] Motion for Extension of Time of deadlines for expert discovery. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 17-Apr-2007. [Article] Court
[270] 20-Apr-2007 Order granting [268] Motion for Protective Order - Second Stipulated Addendum to Protective Order. [Article] Court
[271] 20-Apr-2007 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Copyright Ownership Portions of SCO's Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition [See [377] - Order.]
[Referenced by [272] [299] [326] [332] [335] [340] [342] [344] [355].]
[Article] Novell
[272] 20-Apr-2007 Memorandum in Support of Motion [271] for Partial Summary Judgment on the Copyright Ownership Portions of SCO's Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition [Article] Novell
[273] 20-Apr-2007 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claim in its Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition [PJ: I think this is a duplicate of 271 by mistake. No doubt it will be corrected later (see [282]).] [See [377] - Order.]
[Referenced by [274] [287] [301] [326] [333] [335] [340] [341] [344] [355].]
[Article] Novell
[274] 20-Apr-2007 Memorandum in Support of Motion [273] for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claim in its Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Evolution v. Prime Rate) [Referenced by [287].] [Article] Novell
[275] 20-Apr-2007 Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance [See [377] - Order.]
[Referenced by [276] [278] [279] [280] [281] [286] [306] [324] [326] [334] [335] [337] [338] [340] [341] [345] [356].]
[Article] Novell
[276] 20-Apr-2007 Memorandum in Support of Motion [275] for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance [Redaction of [286]] [Article]
[Text]
Novell
[277] 20-Apr-2007 Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title Based on Failure to Establish Special Damages [See [377] - Order.]
[Referenced by [288] [307] [326] [335] [339] [340] [341] [344] [355] [611] [621].]
[Article] Novell
[278] 20-Apr-2007 Declaration of Allison Amadia re [275] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2) [Article]
[Text]
Novell
[279] 20-Apr-2007 Declaration of David Bradford re [275] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3) [Article]
[Text]
Novell
[280] 20-Apr-2007 Declaration of James R. Tolonen re [275] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance [Article] Novell
[281] 20-Apr-2007 Declaration of Tor Braham re [275] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance.
(Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2 Pt. A, # (3) Exhibit 2 Pt. B, # (4) Exhibit 2 Pt. C, # (5) Exhibit 3, # (6) Exhibit 4, # (7) Exhibit 5 Pt. A, # (8) Exhibit 5 Pt. B, # (9) Exhibit 6 Pt. A, # (10) Exhibit 6 Pt. B, # (11) Exhibit 7 and Exhibit 8, # (12) Exhibit 9, # (13) Exhibit 10, # (14) Exhibit 11)
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[282] 20-Apr-2007 Notice (Other) of Corrected Filing by Novell, Inc. re [273] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claim in its Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition [Referenced by [301].] [Article] Novell
[283] 20-Apr-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing of Memoranda and Declarations [Article] Novell
[284] 20-Apr-2007 [Sealed] Declaration of Kenneth W. Brakebill [Referenced by [285].] Novell
[285] 23-Apr-2007 Redaction to Declaration [284] Kenneth W. Brakebill. Modified on 23-Apr-2007
[Exhibit 16, Exhibit 21, Ex 25, Ex 33, Ex 36, Exhibit 40, Exhibit 45, Exhibit 46 (Exhibit 46 Full), Exhibit 57, Exhibit 58, Exhibit 59, Exhibit 61, Exhibit 62, Exhibit 63
[Article]
[Article]
[Article]
Novell
[286] 20-Apr-2007 [Sealed] Memorandum in Support re [275] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance [Note redacted as [276].] Novell
[287] 20-Apr-2007 [Sealed] Memorandum in Support re [273] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claim in its Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition [Note redacted as [274].] Novell
[288] 20-Apr-2007 [Sealed] Memorandum in Support re [277] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title Based on Failure to Establish Special Damages [Note redacted as [291].] Novell
[289] 24-Apr-2007 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Marc J. Pernick,. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A - Application# (2) Exhibit B - Electronic Case Filing Registration Form# (3) Exhibit C - Proposed Order) [Referenced by [290].] Novell
[290] 25-Apr-2007 Order granting [289] Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Marc J. Pernick for Novell Court
[291] 25-Apr-2007 Redaction to [288] Memorandum in Support of Novell's Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title Based on Failure to Establish Special Damages. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - The SCO Group v. Novell, # (2) Exhibit 2 - Geer v. Cox, # (3) Exhibit 3 - Zapata v. IBP, # (4) Exhibit 4 - Marseilles Hydro Power v. Marseilles Land & Water, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Computerized Thermal Imaging v. Bloomberg, # (6) Exhibit 6 - Professional Asset Mgmt. v. Penn Square Bank) [Text] Novell
[292] 14-May-2007 Defendant's Memorandum in Opposition re [258] Motion for Summary Judgment (Partial) on SCO's First, Second and Fifth Causes of Action and for Summary Judgment on Novell's First Counterclaim.
(Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-Response to SCO's Statement of Facts, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C) [Referenced by [293] [295].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[293] 14-May-2007 Declaration of James McKenna re [292] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion [Article] Novell
[294] 14-May-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing of (Sealed Memorandum in Opposition & Sealed/Redacted Supplemental Declaration) [Article] Novell
[295] 14-May-2007 [Sealed] Memorandum in Support re [292] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's First, Second, and Fifth Causes of Action and for Summary Judgment on Novell's First Counterclaim (Copyright Ownership) [Article] Novell
[296] 14-May-2007 [Sealed] Supplemental Declaration of Kenneth W. Brakebill in Opposition to SCO's Motion for Summary Judgment [Referenced by [297].] [Article] Novell
[297] 14-May-2007 Redaction to [296] Sealed Supplemental Declaration of Kenneth W. Brakebill. (Exhibits not attached in this image due to overlength size.) [Article] Novell
[298] 15-May-2007 Objections to [213] Sealed Document, [258] Motion for Summary Judgment (Partial) on SCO's First, Second and Fifth Causes of Action and for Summary Judgment on Novell's First Counterclaim, [224] Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Counterclaim, [259] Memorandum in Support of Motion, [Evidentiary Objections to SCO's Summary Judgment Exhibits].
(Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B)
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[299] 18-May-2007 Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition re [271] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Copyright Ownership Portions of SCO's Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition. [Article] SCO
[300] 18-May-2007 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [323].] [Article] SCO
[301] 18-May-2007 Plaintiff's Memorandum in Opposition re [273] [note corrected as [282].] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claim in its Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Unpublished Cases) [Article] SCO
[302] 18-May-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing of SCO's Memorandum in Opposition to Novell's Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance, SCO's Response in Opposition to Novell's Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title Based on Failure to Establish Special Damages, Declaration of Mark F. James. [Article] SCO
[303] 18-May-2007 [PJ note: this PDF is a list of exhibits from Lexis, with copyrighted material. So instead, we downloaded the rulings from PACER directly, and here they are:] Exhibit 1, Exhibit 2, Exhibit 3 [Article] SCO
[304] 19-May-2007 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages re SCO's Response in Opposition to Novell's Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title Based on Failure to Establish Special Damages. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [321].] [Article] SCO
[305] 19-May-2007 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages re SCO's Memorandum in Opposition to Novell's Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [322].] [Article] SCO
[306] 18-May-2007 [Sealed] Memorandum in Opposition re: [275] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance. [Note, Redacted as [325]] [Referenced by [324].] [Article] SCO
[307] 18-May-2007 [Sealed] Response in Opposition re: [277] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title Based on Failure to Establish Special Damages. [Note, Redacted as [360]] [Article] SCO
[308] 18-May-2007 [Sealed] Declaration of Mark F. James
[Referenced by [309] [310] [311] [312] [313] [314] [315] [316] [317] [318] [319] [320] [327] [328] [329] [330] [351].]
[Article] SCO
[309] 18-May-2007 [Sealed] Exhibits 9-14 re: [308] Sealed Document [Referenced by [350].] [Article] SCO
[310] 18-May-2007 [Sealed] Exhibits 15-20 re: [308] Sealed Document [Referenced by [350].] [Article] SCO
[311] 18-May-2007 [Sealed] Exhibits 21-34 re: [308] Sealed Document [Referenced by [350].] [Article] SCO
[312] 18-May-2007 [Sealed] Exhibits 35-40 re: [308] Sealed Document [Referenced by [350].] [Article] SCO
[313] 18-May-2007 [Sealed] Exhibits 41-50 re: [308] Sealed Document [Referenced by [350].] [Article] SCO
[314] 18-May-2007 [Sealed] Exhibits 51-59 re: [308] Sealed Document [Referenced by [350].] [Article] SCO
[315] 18-May-2007 [Sealed] Exhibits 60-63 re: [308] Sealed Document [Referenced by [350].] [Article] SCO
[316] 18-May-2007 [Sealed] Exhibits 64-70 re: [308] Sealed Document [Referenced by [350].] [Article] SCO
[317] 18-May-2007 [Sealed] Exhibits 71-75 re: [308] Sealed Document [Referenced by [350].] [Article] SCO
[318] 18-May-2007 [Sealed] Exhibits 76-86 re: [308] Sealed Document [Referenced by [350].] [Article] SCO
[319] 18-May-2007 [Sealed] Exhibits 87-104 re: [308] Sealed Document [Referenced by [350].] [Article] SCO
[320] 18-May-2007 [Sealed] Exhibits 105-120 re: [308] Sealed Document [Referenced by [350].] [Article] SCO
[321] 21-May-2007 Order granting [304] Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. [Article] Court
[322] 21-May-2007 Order granting [305] Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. [Article] Court
[323] 21-May-2007 Order granting [300] Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. [Article] Court
[324] 21-May-2007 Declaration of G. Gervaise Davis III re [306] Sealed Document, SCO's Memorandum in Opposition re: [275] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A - Exibit B) [Text] SCO
[325] 24-May-2007 Redaction to [306] SCO's Memorandum in Opposition to Novell's Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance. (Attachments: # (1) Part 2, # (2) Appendix) [Article] SCO
[326] 24-May-2007 Notice of Hearing on Motion re:
[275] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance,
[277] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title Based on Failure to Establish Special Damages,
[273] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claim in its Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition,
[180] Cross Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Counterclaims,
[258] Motion for Summary Judgment (Partial) on SCO's First, Second and Fifth Causes of Action and for Summary Judgment on Novell's First Counterclaim Motion for Summary Judgment (Partial) on SCO's First, Second and Fifth Causes of Action and for Summary Judgment on Novell's First Counterclaim,
[271] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Copyright Ownership Portions of SCO's Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition,
[224] Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Counterclaim,
[147] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction,
[171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief : Motion Hearing set for 31-May-2007 09:00 AM in Room 220 before Judge Dale A. Kimball.
[Article] Court
[327] 24-May-2007 Exhibit 113 re [308] Sealed Declaration of Mark F. James. Modified on 25-May-2007 by adding descriptive text [Article] SCO
[328] 24-May-2007 Exhibit 114 re [308] Sealed Declaration of Mark F. James. Modified on 25-May-2007 by adding descriptive text [Article] SCO
[329] 24-May-2007 Redaction to Exhibit 89 re [308] Sealed Declaration of Mark F. James. Modified on 25-May-2007 by adding descriptive text [Article] SCO
[330] 25-May-2007 Exhibits filed by SCO Group re [308] Sealed Document. [Article]
[331] 25-May-2007 Ex Parte (Not Sealed) Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages (Overlength Reply Memoranda). (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [343].] [Article] Novell
[332] 25-May-2007 Reply to Response to Motion re [271] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Copyright Ownership Portions of SCO's Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A - Klein-Becker v. Home Shopping Network# (2) Exhibit B - Bloom v. Goodyear Tire) [Article] Novell
[333] 25-May-2007 Reply to Response to Motion re [273] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claim in its Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Addendum: Response to SCO's Statement of Facts, # (2) Exhibit A-D: Unpublished Decisions, # (3) Exhibit E-G: Unpublished Decisions, # (4) Exhibit H: Unpublished Decision) [Article] Novell
[334] 25-May-2007 Declaration of James McKenna re [275] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance. [Article] Novell
[335] 25-May-2007 Declaration of Kenneth W. Brakebill re
[275] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance,
[271] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Copyright Ownership Portions of SCO's Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition,
[277] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title Based on Failure to Establish Special Damages,
[273] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claim in its Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition.
(Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8, # (9) Exhibit 9, # (10) Exhibit 10, # (11) Exhibit 11, # (12) Exhibit 13, # (13) Exhibit 14, # (14) Exhibit 15)
[Article]
[Article]
Novell
[336] 25-May-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing of Reply Memoranda and Declaration. [Article] Novell
[337] 25-May-2007 Reply to Response to Motion re [275] [Motion] for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance [Redacted].
(Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A - Response to SCO's Statement of Facts, # (2) Exhibit B - Relational Design v. Brock, # (3) Exhibit C - Dick Corp. v. SNC-Lavalin, # (4) Exhibit D - Bank of the West v. Resolution Trust, # (5) Exhibit E - Wester Online Dictionary Entry for "Require")
[Article] Novell
[338] 25-May-2007 [Sealed] Reply in Support of [275] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance. [Article] Novell
[339] 25-May-2007 [Sealed] Reply in Support of [277] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title Based on Failure to Establish Special Damages. [Note: redacted as [358]] [Article] Novell
[340] 25-May-2007 [Sealed] 2nd Supplemental Declaration of Kenneth W. Brakebill re:
[147] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction,
[171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief,
[271] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Copyright Ownership Portions of SCO's Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition,
[273] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claim in its Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition,
[275] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance,
[277] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title Based on Failure to Establish Special Damages
[Article] Novell
[341] 29-May-2007 Amended Notice of Hearing on Motion re:
[275] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance,
[277] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title Based on Failure to Establish Special Damages,
[273] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claim in its Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition : (Notice generated by Kim Jones) Motion Hearing reset for 31-May-2007 02:00 PM in Room 220 before Judge Dale A. Kimball.
[Article] Court
[342] 29-May-2007 Second Amended Notice of Hearing on Motion re:
[258] Motion for Summary Judgment (Partial) on SCO's First, Second and Fifth Causes of Action and for Summary Judgment on Novell's First Counterclaim,
[271] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Copyright Ownership Portions of SCO's Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition,
[224] Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Counterclaim,
[171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief : (Notice generated by Kim Jones) Motion Hearing reset for 04-Jun-2007 09:00 AM in Room 220 before Judge Dale A. Kimball.
[Article] Court
[343] 29-May-2007 Order granting [331] Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. [Article] Court
[344] 29-May-2007 Corrected Notice of Hearing on Motion re:
[277] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title Based on Failure to Establish Special Damages,
[273] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claim in its Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition,
[271] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Copyright Ownership Portions of SCO's Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition
(Notice generated by Kim Jones) Motion Hearing set for 31-May-2007 02:00 PM in Room 220 before Judge Dale A. Kimball.
[Article] Court
[345] 29-May-2007 Second Corrected Notice of Hearing on Motion re:
[275] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance,
[258] Motion for Summary Judgment (Partial) on SCO's First, Second and Fifth Causes of Action and for Summary Judgment on Novell's First Counterclaim,
[224] Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Counterclaim,
[171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief
(Notice generated by Kim Jones) Motion Hearing set for 04-Jun-2007 09:00 AM in Room 220 before Judge Dale A. Kimball.
[Article] Court
[346] 29-May-2007 Reply to Response to Motion [258] for Summary Judgment (Partial) on SCO's First, Second and Fifth Causes of Action and for Summary Judgment on Novell's First Counterclaim. [Referenced by [347] [348].] [Article] SCO
[347] 29-May-2007 Declaration of Edward Normand re [346] Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1-2, # (2) Exhibit 3, # (3) Exhibit 4-12, # (4) Exhibit 13-14, # (5) Exhibit 15 Part 1, # (6) Exhibit 15 Part 2, # (7) Exhibit 15 Part 3, # (8) Exhibit 15 Part 4, # (9) Exhibit 15 Part 5, # (10) Exhibit 16-19, # (11) Exhibit 20-26, # (12) Exhibit 27-34) (Normand, Edward) [Article]
[Article]
SCO
[348] 29-May-2007 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages re Docket Entry [346]. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [349].] [Article] SCO
[349] 30-May-2007 Order granting [348] Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. [Article] Court
[350] 29-May-2007 [Sealed] Novell's Evidentiary Objections to SCO's Exhibits Submitted in Support of its Summary Judgment Oppositions filed 18-May-2007 re [317] Sealed Document, [314] Sealed Document, [315] Sealed Document, [319] Sealed Document, [316] Sealed Document, [312] Sealed Document, [311] Sealed Document, [309] Sealed Document, [310] Sealed Document, [313] Sealed Document, [318] Sealed Document, [320] Sealed Document. [Note: redacted as [359]] [Referenced by [361] [362].] Novell
[351] 30-May-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing of Supplemental Declaration of Mark F. James re [308] Sealed Document [Article] SCO
[352] 30-May-2007 Motion to Strike Supplemental Declaration of Mark F. James Attaching Expert Reports and Declarations. [Referenced by [353].] [Article] Novell
[353] 30-May-2007 Memorandum in Support re [352] Motion to Strike Supplemental Declaration of Mark F. James Attaching Expert Reports and Declarations. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A - Leviton v. Nicor) [Article] Novell
[354] 30-May-2007 [Sealed] Supplemental Declaration of Mark F. James SCO
[355] 31-May-2007 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Dale A. Kimball : Motion Hearing held on 31-May-2007
re [271] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on the Copyright Ownership Portions of SCO's Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition filed by Novell, Inc.,
[273] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claim in its Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition filed by Novell, Inc.,
[277] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title Based on Failure to Establish Special Damages filed by Novell, Inc.
After hearing the arguments of counsel, the Court took the motions under advisement.
[Groklaw's Reports from the Hearing. Transcript Article, PDF and Text. Transcript [585].]
Court
[356] 04-Jun-2007 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Dale A. Kimball : Motion Hearing held on 04-Jun-2007
re [275] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance filed by Novell, Inc.,
[258] Motion for Summary Judgment (Partial) on SCO's First, Second and Fifth Causes of Action and for Summary Judgment on Novell's First Counterclaim filed by SCO Group,
[224] Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Counterclaim filed by SCO Group,
[171] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief filed by Novell, Inc.
After hearing the arguments of counsel, the Court took the motions under advisement.
[Groklaw's Reports from the Hearing. Transcript article, PDF and Text. Transcript [578] [588].]
[Article] Court
[357] 07-Jun-2007 Certificate of Service Regarding SCO's Expert Reports [Article] SCO
[358] 07-Jun-2007 Redaction to Reply Memorandum [339] in Support of Novell's Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title Based on Failure to Establish Special Damages. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D) [Article] Novell
[359] 07-Jun-2007 Redaction to [350] Novell's Evidentiary Objections to SCO's Exhibits Submitted in Support of Its Summary Judgment Oppositions Filed May 18, 2007. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, Part 1, # (2) Exhibit A, Part 2, # (3) Exhibit A, Part 3, # (4) Exhibit A, Part 4, # (5) Exhibit B) [Article] Novell
[360] 11-Jun-2007 Redaction to [307] SCO's Response in Opposition to Novell's Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title Based on Failure to Establish Special Damages [Article] SCO
[361] 18-Jun-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing of SCO's Memorandum in Opposition to Novell's Evidentiary Objections to SCO's Exhibits Submitted in Support of Its Summary Judgment Oppositions Filed May 18, 2007, Incorporating by Reference Novell's Evidentiary Objections to SCO's Summary Judgment Exhibits (Filed Under Seal) re [350] Sealed Document, [Article] SCO
[362] 18-Jun-2007 [Sealed] Memorandum in Opposition to Novell's Evidentiary Objections to SCO's Exhibits Submitted in Support of its Summary Judgment Oppositions Filed May 18, 2007, Incorporating by Reference Novell's Evidentiary Objections to SCO's Summary Judgment Exhibits, re [350] Sealed Objections. No attachment. [Referenced by [363] [366].] [Article] SCO
[363] 18-Jun-2007 [Sealed] Exhibits to SCO's Memorandum in Opposition to Novell's Evidentiary Objections to SCO's Exhibits Submitted in Support of its Summary Judgment Oppositions Filed May 18, 2007 Incorporating by Reference Novell's Evidentiary Objections to SCO's Summary Judgment Exhibits re [362] Sealed Document. [Article] SCO
[364] 20-Jun-2007 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages re SCO's Memorandum in Opposition to Novell's Evidentiary Objections to SCO's Exhibits Submitted in Support of Its Summary Judgment Oppositions Filed May 18, 2007, incorporating by reference Novell's Evidentiary Objections to SCO's Summary Judgment Exhibits. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [365].] SCO
[365] 20-Jun-2007 Order granting [364] Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Court
[366] 03-Jul-2007 Response re [362] Sealed Document, (SCO's Opposition to Novell's Evidentiary Objections to SCO's Exhibits Submitted in Connection with Summary Judgment Motions). (Attachments: # (1) Appendix A, # (2) Appendix B) [Article] Novell
[367] 10-Jul-2007 Stipulation Re: Pretrial Schedule [Text] SCO/
Novell
[368] 11-Jul-2007 Pretrial Order Setting dates/deadlines. Final Pretrial Conference set for 11-Sep-2007. Jury Trial set for 17-Sep-2007 08:30 AM in Room 220 before Judge Dale A. Kimball. [Article] Court
[369] 02-Aug-2007 Proposed Witness List and Exhibit List (Rule 26 Pretrial Disclosures). (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-1, A-2, B and C) [Referenced by [515] [518].] [Article] Novell
[370] 02-Aug-2007 Proposed Witness List and Exhibit List (Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures). [Referenced by [516].] [Article] SCO
[371] 03-Aug-2007 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Eric M. Acker. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C - Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [373].] [Article] Novell
[372] 06-Aug-2007 Amended Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures [Referenced by [516].] [Article] SCO
[373] 06-Aug-2007 Order granting [371] Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Eric M. Acker for Novell [Article] Court
[374] 08-Aug-2007 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time Re Objections to Pre-Trial Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [376].] [Article] SCO
[375] 09-Aug-2007 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time for Submission of Pre-Trial Order. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Article] SCO
[376] 09-Aug-2007 Order granting [374] Motion for Extension of Time to file objections to the Pre-Trial Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures until 31-Aug-2007. [Article] Court
[377] 10-Aug-2007 Memorandum Decision and Order on Partial Summary Judgments.
[147] Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction is Granted in Part and Denied in Part;
[180] SCO's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Counterclaims is Granted in Part and Denied in Part;
[171] Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its Fourth Claim is Granted;
[224] SCO's Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim is Denied;
[258] SCO's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its First, Second, and Fifth Claims and Novell's First Claim is Denied;
[271] Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Copyright Ownership of SCO's Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition is Granted;
[273] Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claims in its Second and Fifth Claims is Granted in Part and Denied in Part;
[275] Novell's Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance is Granted;
[277] and Novell's Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title for Failure to Establish Special Damages is Moot.
[Referenced by [419] [420] [454] [458] [461] [462] [463] [465] [567].]
[Article]
[Text]
Court
[378] 10-Aug-2007 Trial Order [Text] Court
[379] 17-Aug-2007 Status Report (Joint Statement in Response to the Court's August 10, 2007 Memorandum Decision and Order) [Referenced by [635].] [Text] Novell
[380] 22-Aug-2007 Proposed Witness List and Exhibit List (Novell's First Amended Rule 26 Pretrial Disclosures). (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-1, A-2, B and C) [Referenced by [515] [518].] [Article] Novell
[381] 22-Aug-2007 Second Amended Proposed Exhibit List and Witness List (Rule 26 Pretrial Disclosures) [Referenced by [429] [516].] [Article] SCO
[382] 23-Aug-2007 Second Amended Rule 26 Pretrial Disclosures with 5 new exhibits
[Referenced by [452] [515] [518].]
[Article] Novell
[383] 24-Aug-2007 Status Report (Supplemental Joint Statement re: the Parties' August 17, 2007 Joint Statement) [Article] Novell
[384] 24-Aug-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing Re: SCO's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Terry L. Musika and SCO's Motion in Limine Regarding Apportionment of 2003 Microsoft and Sun Agreements [Note redacted as [402] and [403].] [Article] SCO
[385] 24-Aug-2007 Motion to Strike SCO's Jury Demand. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)
[Referenced by [386] [430] [438] [453].]
[Article] Novell
[386] 24-Aug-2007 Memorandum in Support re [385] Motion to Strike SCO's Jury Demand. [Text] Novell
[387] 24-Aug-2007 Motion to Dismiss Voluntarily Its Third Claim for Relief. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)
[Referenced by [388] [417] [439] [453].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[388] 24-Aug-2007 Memorandum in Support re [387] Motion to Dismiss Voluntarily Its Third Claim for Relief. [Article]
[Text]
Novell
[389] 24-Aug-2007 Motion in Limine to Exclude All Evidence Related to Other Litigation and Commentary Thereon
[Referenced by [400] [422] [445] [453].]
[Article]
[Text]
[Text]
SCO
[390] 24-Aug-2007 Motion [in Limine] to Strike Exhibits on Novell's Revised Exhibit List Not Previously Disclosed.
[Referenced by [400] [423] [440] [446] [457] [466].]
[Article]
[Text]
SCO
[391] 24-Aug-2007 Motion in Limine No. 1 to Preclude SCO from Challenging Questions Already Decided as a Matter of Law. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)
[Referenced by [392] [398] [400] [407] [418] [436] [453].]
[Article] Novell
[392] 24-Aug-2007 Memorandum in Support re [391] Motion in Limine No. 1 to Preclude SCO from Challenging Questions Already Decided as a Matter of Law. [Article] Novell
[393] 24-Aug-2007 Motion in Limine No. 2 to Preclude SCO from Contesting Licenses Conveying SVRX Rights are "SVRX Licenses". (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)
[Referenced by [394] [398] [400] [407] [421] [437] [453].]
[Article] Novell
[394] 24-Aug-2007 Memorandum in Support of [393] Motion in Limine No. 2 to Preclude SCO from Contesting Licenses Conveying SVRX Rights are "SVRX Licenses" filed by Defendant , Inc. [Article] Novell
[395] 24-Aug-2007 Motion in Limine No. 3 to Preclude SCO from Introducing New Evidence or Argument of SCOsource Revenue. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)
[Referenced by [396] [397] [398] [400] [404] [407] [424] [435] [453].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[396] 24-Aug-2007 [Redacted] [Sealed] Memorandum in Support of [395] Motion in Limine No. 3 to Preclude SCO from Introducing New Evidence or Argument of SCOsource Revenue. Modified on 27-Aug-2007 by sealing document image. The image attached was not redacted and was mistakenly attached as the redacted version. Please see [397] for the redacted image [Article]
[Text]
[Article]
Novell
[397] 24-Aug-2007 Notice of Corrected Filing of Memorandum in Support re [396] Memorandum in Support of Motion in Limine No. 3 to Preclude SCO from Introducing New Evidence or Argument Regarding Apportionment of SCOsource Revenue Modified on 27-Aug-2007 by linking to [395] Motion [Article] Novell
[398] 24-Aug-2007 [Redacted] Declaration of David E. Melaugh re [395] Motion in Limine No. 3 to Preclude SCO from Introducing New Evidence or Argument of SCOsource Revenue, [391] Motion in Limine No. 1 to Preclude SCO from Challenging Questions Already Decided as a Matter of Law, [393] Motion in Limine No. 2 to Preclude SCO from Contesting Licenses Conveying SVRX Rights are "SVRX Licenses". (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 & 2, # (2) Exhibit 3 Pt. 1, # (3) Exhibit 3 Pt. 2, # (4) Exhibit 4-6, # (5) Exhibit Ex. 8-15) [Article] Novell
[399] 24-Aug-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing of Declaration of David E. Melaugh in Support of Novell's Motions in Limine Nos. 1-3 (Filed Under Seal), Opening Brief in Support of Novell's Motion in Limine No. 3 to Preclude SCO from Introducing New Evidence or Argument Regarding Apportionment of SCOsource Revenue (Filed Under Seal). [Article] Novell
[400] 27-Aug-2007 Notice of Hearing on Motion re:
[389] Plaintiff's Motion in Limine to Exclude All Evidence Related to Other Litigation and Commentary Thereon,
[393] Motion in Limine No. 2 to Preclude SCO from Contesting Licenses Conveying SVRX Rights are "SVRX Licenses",
[390] Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Exhibits on Novell's Revised Exhibit List Not Previously Disclosed,
[395] Motion in Limine No. 3 to Preclude SCO from Introducing New Evidence or Argument of SCOsource Revenue,
[391] Motion in Limine No. 1 to Preclude SCO from Challenging Questions Already Decided as a Matter of Law.
Motion Hearing set for 13-Sep-2007 10:00 AM in Room 220 before Judge Dale A. Kimball.
[Article] Court
[401] 27-Aug-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing of SCO's Amended Motion in Limine Regarding Apportionment of 2003 Microsoft and Sun Agreements (Amending Exhibit 2: Plaintiff inadvertently filed with the Court the incorrect version) [Article] SCO
[402] 27-Aug-2007 Redaction to [384] [More likely [405] the motion itself.] Notice of Conventional Filing SCO's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Terry L. Musika. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1: Filed Under Seal# (2) Exhibit 2: Filed Under Seal) [Article] SCO
[403] 27-Aug-2007 Redaction to [384] [More likely [406] the motion itself.] Notice of Conventional Filing SCO's Motion in Limine Regarding Apportionment of 2003 Microsoft and Sun Agreements. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1: Filed Under Seal# (2) Exhibit 2: Filed Under Seal) [Article] SCO
[404] 24-Aug-2007 [Sealed] Opening Brief/Memorandum in Support re [395] Motion in Limine No. 3 to Preclude SCO from Introducing New Evidence or Argument of SCOsource. (Entered: 27-Aug-2007) Novell
[405] 24-Sep-2007 [Sealed] Motion to Exclude Testimony of Terry L. Musika. (Entered: 27-Aug-2007) [Redacted as [402].]
[Referenced by [425] [432] [442] [457] [466].]
SCO
[406] 24-Sep-2007 [Sealed] Motion in Limine Regarding Apportionment of 2003 Microsoft and Sun Agreements. (Entered: 27-Aug-2007) [Redacted as [403].]
[Referenced by [408] [433] [434] [449].]
SCO
[407] 24-Sep-2007 [Sealed] Declaration of David E. Melaugh in Support of Novell's Motions in Limine Nos. 1-3, re [395] Motion in Limine No. 3 to Preclude SCO from Introducing New Evidence or Argument of SCOsource Revenue, [391] Motion in Limine No. 1 to Preclude SCO from Challenging Questions Already Decided as a Matter of Law, [393] Motion in Limine No. 2 to Preclude SCO from Contesting Licenses Conveying SVRX Rights are "SVRX Licenses". (Entered: 27-Aug-2007) Novell
[408] 27-Aug-2007 [Sealed] Amended Motion in Limine Regarding Apportionment of 2003 Microsoft and Sun Agreements. Amends Motion [406].
[Referenced by [426] [433] [434] [453].]
[Article] SCO
[409] 29-Aug-2007 Amended Notice of Hearing on Motion re: all motions in limine reset for 11-Sep-2007 10:00 AM in Room 220 before Judge Dale A. Kimball. [Article] Court
[410] 29-Aug-2007 Motion for Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)
[Referenced by [411] [448] [453].]
[Article] SCO
[411] 29-Aug-2007 Memorandum in Support of Motion [410] for Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-C: Unpublished Cases) [Text]
[Text]
SCO
[412] 29-Aug-2007 Status Report (Joint Statement Regarding Trial Length) [Article] Novell
[413] 29-Aug-2007 Motion to Withdraw Matthew I. Kreeger, Johnathan Mansfield and Maame A.F. Ewusi-Mensah as Counsel for Novell, Inc. [Referenced by [414] [416].] [Article] Novell
[414] 29-Aug-2007 Memorandum in Support of Motion [413] to Withdraw Matthew I. Kreeger, Johnathan Mansfield and Maame A.F. Ewusi-Mensah as Counsel for Novell, Inc. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Article] Novell
[415] 29-Aug-2007 Joint Statement Regarding Jury Instructions with Exhibits 1 and 2. [Article] Novell
[416] 31-Aug-2007 Order granting [413] Motion to Withdraw as Counsel as to Matthew Kreeger, Johnathan Mansfield and Maame A.F. Ewusi-Mensah for Novell. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 30-Aug-2007. [Article]
[417] 31-Aug-2007 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion [387] to Dismiss Voluntarily Its Third Claim for Relief [Article]
[Text]
SCO
[418] 31-Aug-2007 Memorandum in Opposition to [391] Motion in Limine No. 1 to Preclude SCO from Challenging Questions Already Decided as a Matter of Law. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-B: Unpublished Cases) [Article] SCO
[419] 31-Aug-2007 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of the Court's August 10, 2007 Order [377] on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.
[Referenced by [420] [454] [458] [463] [465] [469].]
[Article]
[Text]
SCO
[420 ] 31-Aug-2007 Memorandum in Support of Motion [419] for Reconsideration or Clarification of the Court's August 10, 2007 Order [377] on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-B: Unpublished Cases) [Article]
[Text]
SCO
[421] 31-Aug-2007 Memorandum in Opposition to [393] Motion in Limine No. 2 to Preclude SCO from Contesting Licenses Conveying SVRX Rights are "SVRX Licenses". (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A: Unpublished Case) [Article] SCO
[422] 31-Aug-2007 Memorandum in Opposition to [389] Motion in Limine to Exclude All Evidence Related to Other Litigation and Commentary Thereon. [Referenced by [427].] [Article]
[Text]
Novell
[423] 31-Aug-2007 Memorandum in Opposition to [390] Motion to Strike Exhibits on Novell's Revised Exhibit List Not Previously Disclosed. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit (Attachment A)) [Referenced by [427].] [Article] Novell
[424] 31-Aug-2007 Memorandum in Opposition to [395] Motion in Limine No. 3 to Preclude SCO from Introducing New Evidence or Argument of SCOsource Revenue. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit A: Unpublished Case) [Article] SCO
[425] 31-Aug-2007 Memorandum in Opposition to SCO's Motion In Limine [405] to Exclude Testimony of Terry L. Musika [Redacted] [Note: Redaction of [432].]. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A - Valentino v. Proviso Township, # (2) Exhibit B - Wrench v. Taco Bell) [Referenced by [427].] [Article] Novell
[426] 31-Aug-2007 Memorandum in Opposition to [408] Motion in Limine Regarding Apportionment of Microsoft and Sun SCOsource Licenses [Redacted] [Note: Redaction of [433.] [Referenced by [427].] [Article] Novell
[427] 31-Aug-2007 Declaration of David E. Melaugh re [426] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, [425] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, [423] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, [422] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 5, # (2) Exhibit 6) [Article] Novell
[428] 31-Aug-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing of Novell's Oppositions to SCO's Motions in Limine Regarding Terry L. Musika and the Apportionment of Microsoft and Sun SCOsource Licenses, and the Declaration of David E. Melaugh [Article] Novell
[429] 31-Aug-2007 Objections to [381] Exhibit List (Proposed) (SCO's Second Amended Rule 26 Disclosure). (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A) [Article] Novell
[430] 31-Aug-2007 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion [385] to Strike SCO's Jury Demand. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-B: Unpublished Cases) [Article] SCO
[431] 31-Aug-2007 Proposed Jury Instructions. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, 2 [Text]) [Article] Novell
[432] 31-Aug-2007 [Sealed] Opposition to SCO's [405] Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Terry L. Musika. Entered: 04-Sep-2007 [Note: Redacted as [425].] [Article] Novell
[433] 31-Aug-2007 [Sealed] Opposition to SCO's [406] and [408] Motions in Limine Regarding Apportionment of Microsoft and Sun SCOSOURCE Licenses. Entered: 04-Sep-2007 [Note: Redacted as [426].] [Referenced by [434].] [Article] Novell
[434] 31-Aug-2007 [Sealed] Declaration of David E. MeLaugh in Support of Novell's Opposition [433] to SCO's Motions in Limine entry numbers [406] and [408]. Entered: 04-Sep-2007 [Article] Novell
[435] 04-Sep-2007 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to [395] Motion in Limine No. 3 to Preclude SCO from Introducing New Evidence or Argument of SCOsource Revenue [Article] Novell
[436] 04-Sep-2007 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to [391] Motion in Limine No. 1 to Preclude SCO from Challenging Questions Already Decided as a Matter of Law. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3) [Article] Novell
[437] 04-Sep-2007 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to [393] Motion in Limine No. 2 to Preclude SCO from Contesting Licenses Conveying SVRX Rights are "SVRX Licenses". (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2) [Article] Novell
[438] 04-Sep-2007 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to [385] Motion to Strike SCO's Jury Demand. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2) [Article] Novell
[439] 04-Sep-2007 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to [387] Motion to Dismiss Voluntarily Its Third Claim for Relief [Article]
[Text]
Novell
[440] 04-Sep-2007 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion [390] to Strike Exhibits on Novell's Revised Exhibit List Not Previously Disclosed. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-B (Unpublished Cases)) [Note: there was a Docket correction see [441] and [466], the correct entry is [442]] [Article] SCO
[441] 04-Sep-2007 Notice of Corrected Filing re [440] Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion [Referenced by [466].] [Article] SCO
[442] 04-Sep-2007 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion [405] Re: SCO's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Terry L. Musika. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-B (Unpublished Cases)) [Referenced by [440] [466].] [Article] SCO
[443] 04-Sep-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing of SCO's Reply Memorandum In Further Support of SCO's Motion In Limine Regarding Apportionment of 2003 Microsoft and Sun Agreements. [Article] SCO
[444] 04-Sep-2007 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages re: SCO's Reply Memorandum In Further Support of SCO's Motion in Limine Regarding Apportionment of 2003 Microsoft and Sun Agreements. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [447].] [Article] SCO
[445] 04-Sep-2007 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to [389] Motion in Limine to Exclude All Evidence Related to Other Litigation and Commentary Thereon. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A (Unpublished Case)) [Article]
[Text]
SCO
[446] 04-Sep-2007 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion [390] to Strike Exhibits on Novell's Revised Exhibit List Not Previously Disclosed [Article] SCO
[447] 05-Sep-2007 Order granting [444] Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. [Article] Court
[448] 05-Sep-2007 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion [410] for Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3) [Article] Novell
[449] 04-Sep-2007 [Sealed] Reply Memorandum in Further Support of [406] SCO's Sealed Motion in Limine Regarding Apportionment of 2003 Microsoft and Sun Agreements. (Entered: 05-Sep-2007) SCO
[450] 05-Sep-2007 Objections to SCO's Supplemental Jury Instructions [Article]
[Text]
Novell
[451] 05-Sep-2007 Objections to Novell's Proposed Supplemental Jury Instructions. [Article] SCO
[452] 05-Sep-2007 Objections to [382] Witness List (Proposed) (Novell's Second Amended Rule 26 Pretrial Disclosures). (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A) [Article] SCO
[453] 07-Sep-2007 Order on Motions in Limine
[410] SCO's Motion for Entry of Final Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) is Denied;
[385] Novell's Motion to Strike Jury Demand is Granted;
[387] Novell's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Its Third Claim for Relief is Granted;
[389] SCO's Motion in Limine to Exclude All Evidence Related to Other Litigation and Commentary Thereon is Moot;
[391] Novell's Motion in Limine No. 1 to Preclude SCO from Challenging Questions Already Decided as a Matter of Law is Granted;
[393] Novell's Motion in Limine No. 2 to Preclude SCO from Contesting Licenses Conveying SVRX Rights are "SVRX Licenses" is Granted;
[408] SCO's Amended Motion in Limine Regarding Apportionment of Microsoft and Sun SCOsource Licenses is Moot in Part and Denied in Part;
[395] Novell's Motion in Limine No. 3 to Preclude SCO from Introducing New Evidence or Argument Regarding Apportionment of SCOsource Revenue is Denied.
[Text] Court
[--] 10-Sep-2007 Deadlines/Hearings terminated : Motion hearing set for 11-Sep-2007 is vacated. [Article] Court
[454] 10-Sep-2007 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion [419] for Reconsideration or Clarification of the Court's August 10, 2007 Order [377] on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. [Redacted]. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2) [Referenced by [455] [458].] [Article]
[Text]
Novell
[455] 10-Sep-2007 Declaration of David E. Melaugh re [454] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion [Redacted]. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 5) [Referenced by [459].] [Article] Novell
[456] 10-Sep-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing of Novell's [458] Opposition to SCO's Motion for Reconsideration and David Melaugh's Declaration [459] [Article] Novell
[457] 11-Sep-2007 Order denying [390] Motion to Strike Exhibits; denying [405] Motion to Exclude Testimony. [Article] Court
[458] 10-Sep-2007 [Sealed] Memorandum in Opposition re [419] Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of the Court's August 10, 2007 Order [377] on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Entered: 11-Sep-2007. Modified on 11-Sep-2007 by correcting filed date to 10-Sep-2007. [Note redacted as [454].] [Referenced by [456] [459].] [Article] Novell
[459] 10-Sep-2007 [Sealed] Declaration of David E. Melaugh re [458] Sealed Memorandum in Opposition. Entered: 11-Sep-2007. [Note redacted as [455].] [Referenced by [456].] [Article] Novell
[460] 12-Sep-2007 Notice (Other) of Courtroom Change for Trial [Article] Novell
[461] 12-Sep-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing of SCO's Reply Memorandum In Further Support of its Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of the Court's August 10, 2007 Order [377]. [Article] SCO
[462] 12-Sep-2007 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages re SCO's Reply Memorandum In Further Support of its Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of the Court's August 10, 2007 Order [377]. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [464].] [Article] SCO
[463] 12-Sep-2007 Redacted Reply Memorandum In Further Support of Motion [419] for Reconsideration or Clarification of the Court's August 10, 2007 Order [377]. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2: Filed Under Seal, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4) [Article]
[Text]
SCO
[464] 13-Sep-2007 Order granting [462] Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. [Article] Court
[465] 13-Sep-2007 [Sealed] Reply Memorandum In Further Support re [419] Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration or Clarification of the Court's August 10, 2007 Order re [377] Order on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Article] SCO
[466] 13-Sep-2007 Modification of Docket: re [440] Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion re [390] Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Exhibits on Novell's Revised Exhibit List Not Previously Disclosed filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-B (Unpublished Cases). Correction: See Counsel's Corrected Entry for this Document Dated 04-Sep-2007, Entry [441] and [442]. Entry [440] was modified on 13-Sep-2007 by removing link to Motion [390] as this Reply relates to the Sealed Motion re: Musika, document [405] dated 24-Aug-2007. [Article] SCO
[467] 14-Sep-2007 [Redacted] [470] Trial Brief. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2) [Referenced by [519].] [Article]
[Text]
Novell
[468] 14-Sep-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing of [470] Novell's Trial Brief [Filed Under Seal] [Article] Novell
[469] 14-Sep-2007 Order denying SCO's Motion [419] for Reconsideration or Clarification of the Court's Order dated August 10, 2007 [Text] Court
[470] 14-Sep-2007
[Sealed] Trial Brief [Note: Redacted as [467]] [Referenced by [468] [519].] Novell
[471] 14-Sep-2007 Notice (Other) of Filing for Bankruptcy. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A to Notice of Filing For Bankruptcy [bankruptcy form]). [Article] SCO
[472] 27-Nov-2007 Notice of Delaware Bankruptcy Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting Novell's Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay to Proceed with the Lawsuit. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B) [PJ Note: the Opinion and Order are [232] and [233] in the SCO Bankruptcy] [Text] Novell
[473] 06-Dec-2007 Order requesting a joint statement regarding the appropriate procedures for resolving the issues. [Referenced by [477].] [Text] Court
[474] 11-Dec-2007 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order). Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells. [Referenced by [475] [476].] [Article] Novell
[475] 11-Dec-2007 Memorandum in Support of Motion [474] to Withdraw as Attorney. [Article] Novell
[476] 12-Dec-2007 Order granting [474] Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney John P. Mullen withdrawn from case for Novell, Inc. [Article] Court
[477] 13-Dec-2007 Joint Response re [473] Order [Text] Novell SCO
[478] 21-Dec-2007 Motion for Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief.
[Referenced by [479] [480] [482] [483] [486] [487] [490] [492] [493] [494] [495] [496] [497] [500] [501] [532] [538].]
[Article] Novell
[479] 21-Dec-2007 [Redacted] Memorandum [482] in Support re Motion [478] for Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1) [Referenced by [481].] [Text] Novell
[480] 21-Dec-2007 [Redacted] Declaration [483] of David E. Melaugh re Motion [478] for Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 2 [Text], # (2) Exhibit 5 [Text], # (3) Exhibit 6 [Text], # (4) Exhibit 7 [Text], # (5) Exhibit 8 [text], # (6) Exhibit 9, Pt. 1 [Text], # (7) Exhibit 9, Pt. 2, # (8) Exhibit 9, Pt. 3, # (9) Exhibit 10 [Text], # (10) Exhibit 12 [Text]) [Referenced by [481].] [Article]
[Article]
Novell
[481] 21-Dec-2007 Notice of Conventional Filing of Memorandum in Support of Novell's Motion [Note: Redacted as [479]] for Summary Judgment on its Fourth Claim for Relief, and Declaration of David E. Melaugh [Filed Under Seal] [Note: Redacted as [480]] [Article] Novell
[482] 21-Dec-2007 [Sealed] Memorandum in Support of Novell's [478] Motion for Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief (original not scanned). Entered: 26-Dec-2007. [Note: Redacted as [479]] [Article] Novell
[483] 21-Dec-2007 [Sealed] Declaration of David E. Melaugh in Support of [478] Motion for Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief. Entered: 26-Dec-2007. [Note: Redacted as [480]] [Article] Novell
[484] 11-Jan-2008 Notice of Hearing: 4-day Bench Trial set for 29-Apr-2008 08:30 AM in Room 220 before Judge Dale A. Kimball. Any motions for summary judgment filed will be heard at the time of trial. (Entered: 11-Jan-2008) [Article] Court
[485] 15-Jan-2008 Order regarding bench trial and hearing on motion for summary judgment. [Text] Court
[486] 25-Jan-2008 Notice of Conventional Filing of Memorandum [490] in Opposition to Novell's Motion [478] for Summary Judgment on its Fourth Claim for Relief and Exhibits Thereto. [Referenced by [487].] [Article] SCO
[487] 25-Jan-2008 Declaration of Brent O. Hatch re [486] Notice of Conventional Filing of SCO's Memorandum [490] in Opposition to Novell's Motion [478] for Summary Judgment on its Fourth Claim for Relief and Exhibits Thereto. [Article]
[Text]
SCO
[488] 25-Jan-2008 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [491].] [Article] SCO
[489] 25-Jan-2008 Proposed Exhibit List and Witness List (Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures) Supplemental [Referenced by [516].] [Article] SCO
[490] 25-Jan-2008 [Sealed] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion [478] for Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief. (This memorandum and 7 envelopes of exhibits have not been scanned but will be placed in sealed storage in the clerk's office.) Modified on 04-Feb-2008: removed sealed designation (alt) Modified on 04-Feb-2008 correcting title of entry to Sealed Document instead of Sealed Entry. (Entered: 28-Jan-2008) [Note: Redacted as [501].] [Referenced by [486] [487].] SCO
[491] 28-Jan-2008 Order granting [488] Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Court
[492] 07-Feb-2008 Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to Motion [478] for Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [493].] [Article] Novell
[493] 08-Feb-2008 Order granting [492] Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re [478] Motion for Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief. Replies due by 19-Feb-2008. Entered: 11-Feb-2008. [Article] Court
[494] 19-Feb-2008 Ex Parte (Not Sealed) Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages (Overlength Reply Memorandum in Support of Novell's Motion [478] for Summary Judgment on its Fourth Claim for Relief). (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [498].] [Article] Novell
[495] 19-Feb-2008 [Redacted] [500] Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion re [478] Motion for Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief. [Article]
[Text]
Novell
[496] 19-Feb-2008 Declaration of David E. Melaugh re [478] Motion for Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 3, # (2) Exhibit 4, # (3) Exhibit 5, # (4) Exhibit 6, # (5) Exhibit 7, # (6) Exhibit 8, # (7) Exhibit 9, # (8) Exhibit 10, # (9) Exhibit 11, # (10) Exhibit 12) [Article] Novell
[497] 19-Feb-2008 Notice of Conventional Filing of Reply Memorandum in Support of Novell's Motion [478] for Summary Judgment on its Fourth Claim for Relief and Reply Declaration of David E. Melaugh [Filed Under Seal] [Article] Novell
[498] 20-Feb-2008 Order granting [494] Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. [Article] Court


[500] 19-Feb-2008 [Sealed] Reply Declaration in Support of [478] Motion for Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief. Entered: 20-Feb-2008. [Note: Redacted as [495].] [Article] Novell
[501] 20-Feb-2008 Redaction to [490] Sealed Entry, SCO's Memorandum in Opposition to Novell's Motion [478] for Summary Judgment on it's Fourth Claim for Relief. [Article]
[Text]
SCO
[502] 07-Mar-2008 Notice of Conventional Filing of Motion [505] for Judgment on the Pleadings on Novell's Claims for Money or Claim for Declaratory Relief; or for amendment of the Scope of the Trial. [Article] SCO
[503] 07-Mar-2008 Notice of Conventional Filing of Memorandum [506] in Support of SCO's Motion [505] for Judgment on the Pleadings on Novell's Claims for Money or Claim for Declaratory Relief; or for amendment of the Scope of the Trial. [Article] SCO
[504] 07-Mar-2008 Corrected Notice of Conventional Filing of SCO's Motion [505] for Judgment on the Pleadings on Novell's Claims for Money or Claim for Declaratory Relief, and Memorandum [506] in Support Thereof [Article] SCO
[505] 07-Mar-2008 [Sealed] Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on Novell's Claims for Money or Claim for Declaratory Relief. Motion referred to Brooke C. Wells.
[Referenced by [502] [503] [504] [506] [507] [509] [510] [511] [525] [532] [538].]
[Article] SCO
[506] 07-Mar-2008 [Sealed] Memorandum in Support of [505] Sealed Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on Novell's Claims for Money or Claim for Declaratory Relief. (Document has not been scanned but will be retained in the sealed room of the clerk's office.) [Note: Redacted as [507].] [Referenced by [503] [504].] [Article] SCO
[507] 12-Mar-2008 Redaction to SCO's Memorandum [506] in Support of its Motion [505] for Judgment on the Pleadings on Novell's Claims for Money or Claim for Declaratory Relief. [Article]
[Text]
SCO
[--] 14-Mar-2008 Motions No Longer Referred: [505] Sealed Motion is before Judge Kimball [Article] Court
[508] 31-Mar-2008 Proposed Witness List and Exhibit List (Supplemental) [Referenced by [516].] [Article] SCO
[509] 07-Apr-2008 Memorandum in Opposition to SCO's Motion [505] for Judgment on the Pleadings on Novell's Claims for Money or Claim for Declaratory Relief. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B) [Referenced by [510] [525].] [Article]
[Text]
Novell
[510] 07-Apr-2008 Declaration of David E. Melaugh re [509] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion [505] for Judgment on the Pleadings on Novell's Claims for Money or Claim for Declaratory Relief. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3) [Article] Novell
[511] 08-Apr-2008 Notice of Hearing on Motion. The Motion [505] for Judgment on the Pleadings will also be heard with the Motion for Summary Judgment in the Motion Hearing set for 30-Apr-2008 03:00 PM in Room 220 before Judge Dale A. Kimball. Court
[512] 08-Apr-2008 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Mauricio A. Gonzalez. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [513].] [Article] SCO
[513] 09-Apr-2008 Order granting [512] Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Mauricio A. Gonzalez for SCO Group. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 09-Apr-2008. [Article] Court
[514] 15-Apr-2008 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Jason C. Cyrulnik. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [517].] [Article] SCO
[515] 15-Apr-2008 Proposed Exhibit List (Novell's Third Amended Rule 26 Pretrial Disclosures). (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit C (Supplemental)) [see [369], [380] and [382] for previous Exhibit Lists.] [Referenced by [518].] [Article] Novell
[516] 16-Apr-2008 Proposed Exhibit List (Supplemental) [see [370], [372], [381], [489] and [508] for previous Exhibit Lists.] [Article] SCO
[517] 17-Apr-2008 Order granting [514] Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Jason C. Cyrulnik for SCO Group. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 16-Apr-2008. [Article] Court
[518] 22-Apr-2008 Proposed Exhibit List (Novell's Fourth Amended Rule 26 Pretrial Disclosures). (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit C (Supplemental)) [see [369], [380], [382] and [515] for previous Exhibit Lists.] Novell
[519] 23-Apr-2008 [Sealed] Novell's Amended Trial Brief filed. [Note: the original Trial Brief is [470] redacted as [467]] [Referenced by [522] [523].] Novell
[520] 23-Apr-2008 [Sealed] Trial Brief on Behalf of the SCO Group, Inc. [Referenced by [521] [524].] SCO
[521] 23-Apr-2008 Notice of Conventional Filing of [520] Trial Brief on Behalf of the SCO Group, Inc. [Article] SCO
[522] 23-Apr-2008 Redaction to [519] Novell's Amended Trial Brief. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B) [Text] Novell
[523] 23-Apr-2008 Notice of Conventional Filing of [519] Novell's Amended Trial Brief. [Article] Novell
[524] 24-Apr-2008 Redaction to [520] Trial Brief on Behalf of the SCO Group, Inc. [Text] SCO
[525] 24-Apr-2008 Reply to Response [509] to Motion [505] for Judgment on The Pleadings On Novells Claims For Money Or Claim For Declaratory Relief. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-H: Unpublished Cases) [Text] SCO
[526] 28-Apr-2008 Stipulation (Pretrial). (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A) [Article] Novell
[527] 28-Apr-2008 Stipulation (First Amended Joint Pretrial Stipulation). (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A) [Article] Novell
[528] 29-Apr-2008 Proposed Findings of Fact [Article] Novell
[529] 29-Apr-2008 Proposed Findings of Fact. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-C (Unpublished Cases)) [Article] SCO
[530] 29-Apr-2008 Bench Trial - Begun. Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Dale A. Kimball: Bench Trial held on 29-Apr-2008. Trial opened at 8:30 AM with all parties present. Both parties invoked the witness exclusion rule. Opening statements were made by Mr. Jacobs and Mr. Singer. Testimony of witnesses was heard and evidence rec'd. Depositions of Joseph LaSala and Christopher Sontag were published. Court recessed at 2:08 PM. Attorneys for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Brent Hatch, Jason Cyrulnik; Attorneys for Defendant: Michael Jacobs, Eric Acker, David Melaugh. Court Reporter: Becky Janke/Kelly Hicken. (kmj)
[Note: Groklaw's Reports from the Trial, Transcript PDF-1, PDF-2, PDF-3, Text, With Line #s, Sontag's Testimony. Transcript [589].]
[Article]
[Article]
Court
[531] 30-Apr-2008 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Dale A. Kimball: Bench Trial held on 30-Apr-2008. Court opened at 8:28 AM with all parties present. Testimony of witnesses was heard and evidence rec'd. Deposition of Greg Jones was published. Novell rested its case. Mr. Singer moved for involuntary dismissal; the Court took the motion under advisement without hearing argument at this time. SCO began presenting its case. Court recessed at 2:08 PM. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Jason Cyrulnik; Attorney for Defendant: Michael Jacobs, Eric Acker, David Melaugh. Court Reporter: Kelly Hicken/Becky Janke. (kmj)
[Note: Groklaw's Reports from the Trial, Transcript PDF-1, PDF-2, PDF-3, Text, Article, Sontag's Testimony, Darl's Testimony, Greg Jones' Testimony, John Maciaszek's Testimony. Transcript [580].]
[Article]
[Article]
Court
[532] 30-Apr-2008 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Dale A. Kimball: Motion Hearing held on 30-Apr-2008 re [478] Motion for Summary Judgment /on Novell's Fourth Claim for Relief/ filed by Novell, Inc. and SCO's Motion [505] for Judgment on the Pleadings. After hearing the arguments of counsel, the Court took the motions under advisement. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Mauricio Gonzalez; Attorney for Defendant: Michael Jacobs, Eric Acker, David Melaugh. Court Reporter: Laura Robinson. (kmj) (Entered 01-May-2008)
[Note: Groklaw's Reports from the Hearing, Transcript PDF, Text. Transcript [538].]
[Article] Court
[533] 01-May-2008 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Dale A. Kimball: Bench Trial held on 01-May-2008. Court opened at 8:32 AM with all parties present. Testimony of witnesses was heard and evidence rec'd. Depositions of John Hunsaker and Jay Petersen published. Trial will continue at 9:00 AM 02-May-2008. Court recessed at 2:03 PM. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Mauricio Gonzalez, Jason Cyrulnik; Attorney for Defendant: Michael Jacobs, Eric Acker, David Melaugh. Court Reporter: Becky Janke/Kelly Hicken. (kmj)
[Note: Groklaw's Reports from the Trial, Transcript PDF-1, PDF-2, PDF-3, Text. Transcript [581].]
[Article] Court
[534] 02-May-2008 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Dale A. Kimball: Bench Trial completed on 02-May-2008. Court opened at 9:05 AM with all parties present. Testimony of one witness heard and evidence was rec'd. Deposition of Andrew Nagle was published. SCO rested its case. Closing arguments were presented by Mr. Acker and Mr. Singer. The Court took the matter under advisement. All exhibits were reviewed and approved by counsel. Court adjourned at 12:00 PM. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Mauricio Gonzalez, Jason Cyrulnik, Brent Hatch; Attorney for Defendant: Michael Jacobs, Eric Acker, David Melaugh. Court Reporter: Becky Janke. (kmj)
[Note: Groklaw's Reports from the Trial, Transcript PDF, Text. Transcript [582].]
[Article] Court
[535] 02-May-2008 Trial Witness List. (Entered: 08-May-2008) [Article] Parties
[536] 02-May-2008 Trial Exhibit List of Novell exhibits. (Entered: 08-May-2008) [Article] Parties
[537] 02-May-2008 Trial Exhibit List of SCO exhibits. (kmj) (Entered: 08-May-2008) [Article] Parties
[538] 14-May-2008 [Restricted Document] Transcript of Proceedings held on April 30, 2008-Motion for Summary Judgment before Judge Dale A. Kimball. Court Reporter/Transcriber Laura W. Robinson, CSR, RPR, CP,
Notice Re Redaction of Transcripts: Within 7 calendar days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 04-Jun-2008. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 16-Jun-2008. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 12-Aug-2008. [The motions are [478] and [505]. Minutes [532].]
[Article]
[Text]
Court
[540] 10-Jul-2008 Motion to Intervene filed by Jonathan Lee Riches. Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells. (Entered: 14-Jul-2008) [Referenced by [541].] [Text] Jonathan Lee Riches
[541] 15-Jul-2008 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. Order denying [540] Motion to Intervene and Reconsideration or Clarification. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 15-Jul-2008. (Entered: 16-Jul-2008) [Referenced by [545].] [Text] Court
[542] 16-Jul-2008 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 16-Jul-2008. [Referenced by [550] [551].] [Text] Court
[543] 30-Jul-2008 Joint Motion for Extension of Time Regarding Deadlines for Proposed Final Judgment and Pre-Judgment Interest Submission. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells. [Referenced by [544].] [Article] Novell
[544] 01-Aug-2008 Order granting [543] Motion for Extension of Time for Proposed Final Judgment and Pre-Judgment Interest Submission. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 31-Jul-2008. [Article] Court
[545] 01-Aug-2008 Notice of Appeal as to [541] Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Jonathan Lee Riches. Appeals to the USCA for the Tenth Circuit. Fee Status: Not Paid. (Entered: 04-Aug-2008)
[Referenced by [546] [547] [559].]
[Article] Jonathan Lee Riches
[546] 04-Aug-2008 Transmission of Preliminary Record to USCA re [545] Notice of Appeal; packet to appellant. (Attachments: # (1) Notice of Appeal, # (2) Order, # (3) Docket) [Article] Court
[547] 06-Aug-2008 USCA Case Number Case Appealed to Tenth Case Number 08-4154 for [545] Notice of Appeal filed by Jonathan Lee Riches. [Article] Court
[548] 22-Aug-2008 Joint Motion for Extension of Time Regarding Deadlines for Proposed Final Judgment and Pre-Judgment Interest Submission. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) Motions referred to Brooke C. Wells. [Referenced by [549].] [Article] Novell
[549] 25-Aug-2008 Order granting [548] Motion for Extension of Time Regarding Deadlines for Proposed Final Judgment and Pre-Judgment Interest Submission. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 25-Aug-2008. [Article] Court
[550] 29-Aug-2008 Response re [542] Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law, (Novell's Unopposed Submission Regarding Prejudgment Interest). [Article] Novell
[551] 29-Aug-2008 Response re [542] Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law, (Novell's Submission Regarding Entry of Final Judgment). [Article] Novell
[552] 15-Sep-2008 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Stayed Claims (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [555] [557].] [Article] SCO
[553] 15-Sep-2008 Motion for Judgment under Rule 54(b). (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) [Referenced by [555] [557].] [Article] SCO
[554] 15-Sep-2008 Motion for Entry of Judgment.
[Referenced by [555] [557] [562] [564].]
[Article] SCO
[555] 15-Sep-2008 Memorandum in Support re [553] Motion for Judgment under Rule 54(b), [554] Motion for Entry of Judgment and [552] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Stayed Claims. [Referenced by [556].] [Text] SCO
[556] 15-Sep-2008 Exhibits re [555] Memorandum in Support of Motion. [Article] SCO
[557] 03-Oct-2008 Memorandum in Opposition re [553] Motion for Judgment under Rule 54(b), [554] Motion for Entry of Judgment, [552] Motion to Dismiss Stayed Claims. [Referenced by [558].] [Article]
[Text]
Novell
[558] 03-Oct-2008 Declaration of David E. Melaugh re [557] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion (SCO's Motions for Voluntary Dismissal of Stayed Claims, Entry of Final Judgment, and Certification and Entry of Partial Final Judgment). (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1) [Article]
[Text]
Novell
[559] 06-Oct-2008 Mandate of USCA as to [545] Notice of Appeal (08-4154) filed by Jonathan Lee Riches. According to the USCA the Appeal of the USDC for the Dist of UT is Dismissed pursuant to Tenth Cir. 42.1 for failure to prosecute. (Attachments: # (1) Mandate Cover Letter) US Court of Appeal
[560] 09-Oct-2008 Restricted Document Transcript of Proceedings held on January 25, 2007 - Motion Hearing (Held telephonically) before Judge Dale A. Kimball. Redaction Request due 30-Oct-2008. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 10-Nov-2008. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 07-Jan-2009. [Minutes [229].] Court
[561] 20-Oct-2008 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Its Unresolved Stayed Claims With Prejudice (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)
[Referenced by [562] [563] [564].]
[Text] SCO
[562] 20-Oct-2008 Reply Memorandum/Reply to Response to Motion re [554] Motion for Entry of Judgment and in support of [561] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Its Unresolved Stayed Claims With Prejudice. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order Proposed Final Judgment) [Text] SCO
[563] 31-Oct-2008 Response re [561] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order Novell Proposed Final Judgment, # (2) Exhibit Judgment Redline) [Text] Novell
[564] 06-Nov-2008 Reply to Response to Motion re [554] Motion for Entry of Judgment and Re [561] SCO's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Its Unresolved Stayed Claims With Prejudice. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Text of Proposed Order [Proposed] Final Judgment) [Text] SCO
[565] 20-Nov-2008 Final Judgment in favor of Novell, Inc., SCO Group and also against Novell, Inc., SCO Group. Case Closed. Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells no longer assigned to case. See Judgment for details. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 20-Nov-2008. [Referenced by [567].] [Text] Court
[566] 20-Nov-2008 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (Attachments: # (1) Final Judgment) [Article] Court
[567] 25-Nov-2008 Notice of Appeal as to [377] Order on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, [565] Judgment. Appeals to the USCA for the 10th Circuit. Filing fee $ 455, receipt number 10880000000000796676.
[Referenced by [568] [569] [570] [571] [572] [577] [578] [579] [580] [581] [582] [583] [584] [585] [586] [587] [588] [589] [590] [597] [789] [854] [855] [856] [857] [858] [859] [860] [861] [862] [864] [865] [866] [867] [868] [869] [893].]
[Article] SCO
[568] 26-Nov-2008 Transmission of Preliminary Record to USCA
Docket Text: Transmission of Preliminary Record to USCA re [567] Notice of Appeal. (Attachments: # (1) Memorandum Decision and Order, # (2) Final Judgment, # (3) Notice of Appeal, # (4) Docket)
[Article] Court
[569] 01-Dec-2008 USCA Case Number Case Appealed to Tenth Circuit Case Number 08-4217 for [567] Notice of Appeal, filed by SCO Group. [Text] SCO
[570] 10-Dec-2008 Transcript Request by SCO Group for proceedings held on 11-May-2004; 25-Jan-2007; 31-May-2007; 29-Apr-2008; 30-Apr-2008; 01-May-2008. before Judge Hon. Dale A. Kimball, re [567] Notice of Appeal, [Article] SCO
[571] 10-Dec-2008 Transcript Request by SCO Group for proceedings held on 25-May-2005; 17-Jul-2006; 23-Jan-2007; 04-Jun-2007; 29-Apr-2008; 01-May-2008; 02-May-2008 before Judge Hon. Dale A. Kimball, re [567] Notice of Appeal, [Article] SCO
[572] 10-Dec-2008 Transcript Request by SCO Group for proceedings held on 30-Apr-2008 before Judge Hon. Dale A. Kimball, re [567] Notice of Appeal, [Article] SCO
[573] 10-Dec-2008 Bill of Costs
[Referenced by [574] [575] [593] [595] [879].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[574] 10-Dec-2008 Declaration of David E. Melaugh re [573] Bill of Costs. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3) [Article]
[Text]
Novell
[575] 24-Dec-2008 Motion to Stay [573] Taxation of Costs. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A) [Note: the exhibit is copyrighted Westlaw. However here is the "How v. City of Baxter Springs" Kansas order.] [Referenced by [576] [591].] [Text] SCO
[576] 31-Dec-2008 Memorandum in Opposition re [575] Motion to Stay Taxation of Costs. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit F) [Text] Novell
[577] 08-Jan-2009 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of January 23, 2007-Motion Hearing before Judge Dale A. Kimball, re [567] Notice of Appeal,. Court Reporter/Transcriber Rebecca Janke, CSR, RMR.
Redaction Request due 29-Jan-2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 09-Feb-2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 08-Apr-2009. [Minutes [227].]
Court
[578] 08-Jan-2009 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of June 4, 2007-Motion Hearing Volume II before Judge Dale A. Kimball, re [567] Notice of Appeal,. Court Reporter/Transcriber Rebecca Janke.
Redaction Request due 29-Jan-2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 09-Feb-2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 08-Apr-2009. [Minutes [356].]
Court
[579] 08-Jan-2009 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of July 17, 2006-Motion Hearing before Judge Dale A. Kimball, re [567] Notice of Appeal,. Court Reporter/Transcriber Rebecca Janke.
Redaction Request due 29-Jan-2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 09-Feb-2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 08-Apr-2009. [Minutes [136].]
Court
[580] 27-Jan-2009 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of 30-Apr-2008 - Trial Volume II before Judge Dale A. Kimball, re [567] Notice of Appeal. Court Reporter/Transcriber Rebecca Janke/Kelly Hicken, Telephone number [phone].
Redaction Request due 17-Feb-2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 27-Feb-2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 27-Apr-2009. [Minutes [531].]
Court
[581] 27-Jan-2009 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of 01-May-2008 Trial Volume III before Judge Dale A. Kimball, re [567] Notice of Appeal. Court Reporter/Transcriber Rebecca Janke, Kelly Hicken.
Redaction Request due 17-Feb-2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 27-Feb-2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 27-Apr-2009. [Minutes [533].]
Court
[582] 27-Jan-2009 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of 02-May-2008 Trial Volume IV before Judge Dale A. Kimball, re [567] Notice of Appeal. Court Reporter/Transcriber Rebecca Janke, CSR RMR, Telephone number [phone].
Redaction Request due 17-Feb-2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 27-Feb-2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 27-Apr-2009. [Minutes [534].]
Court
[583] 27-Jan-2009 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of 25-May-2005 - argument on Motion before Judge Dale A. Kimball, re [567] Notice of Appeal. Court Reporter/Transcriber Rebecca Janke, CSR, RMR.
Redaction Request due 17-Feb-2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 27-Feb-2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 27-Apr-2009. [Text without line numbers. Minutes [72].]
[Text] Court
[584] 28-Jan-2009 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of 11-May-2004 - Motion Hearing before Judge Dale A. Kimball, re [567] Notice of Appeal. Court Reporter/Transcriber Kelly Brown Hicken, CSR, RPR, RMR.
Redaction Request due 18-Feb-2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 02-Mar-2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 28-Apr-2009. [Minutes [26].]
Court
[585] 28-Jan-2009 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of 31-May-2007 - Motion Hearing Volume I before Judge Dale A. Kimball, re [567] Notice of Appeal. Court Reporter/Transcriber Kelly Brown Hicken, RPR, CSR, RMR.
Redaction Request due 18-Feb-2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 02-Mar-2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 28-Apr-2009. [Minutes [355].]
Court
[586] 03-Feb-2009 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of 17-Jul-2006 - Motion Hearing before Judge Dale A. Kimball, re [567] Notice of Appeal. Court Reporter/Transcriber Rebecca Janke, CSR, RMR.
Redaction Request due 24-Feb-2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 06-Mar-2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 04-May-2009. [Minutes [136].]
Court
[587] 03-Feb-2009 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of 23-Jan-2007 - Motion Hearing before Judge Dale A. Kimball, re [567] Notice of Appeal. Court Reporter/Transcriber Rebecca Janke, CSR, RMR.
Redaction Request due 24-Feb-2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 06-Mar-2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 04-May-2009. [Minutes [227].]
Court
[588] 03-Feb-2009 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of 04-Jun-2007 - Motion Hearing Volume II before Judge Dale A. Kimball, re [567] Notice of Appeal. Court Reporter/Transcriber Rebecca Janke, CSR, RMR.
Redaction Request due 24-Feb-2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 06-Mar-2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 04-May-2009. [Minutes [356].]
Court
[589] 03-Feb-2009 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of 29-Apr-2008 - Trial before Judge Dale A, Kimball, re [567] Notice of Appeal. Court Reporter/Transcriber Rebecca Janke, CSR, RMR/Kelly Brown Hicken, CSR, RMR.
Redaction Request due 24-Feb-2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 06-Mar-2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 04-May-2009. [Minutes [530].]
Court
[590] 03-Feb-2009 Please be advised the Record is complete for purposes of appeal for USCA case number 08-4217 re [567] Notice of Appeal.(jwt) Court
[591] 13-Mar-2009 Order denying [575] Motion to Stay Taxation of Costs. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 13-Mar-2009. [Text] Court
[592] 27-Mar-2009 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Jonathan Lee Riches, unable to forward. [Article] Court
[593] 27-Mar-2009 Objections to [573] Bill of Costs filed by Counter Defendant SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1-6, # (2) Exhibit A-D (Unpublished Opinions)) [Referenced by [594].] [Text] SCO
[594] 03-Apr-2009 Response re [593] Objections, to Novell's Bill of Costs. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3 [Text]) [Article] Novell
[595] 22-Apr-2009 Costs Taxed in amount of $ 99,639.09 for Defendant against Plaintiff signed by Louise York, Chief Deputy Clerk 22-Apr-2009 (jwt) (Entered: 23-Apr-2009) [See [573].] [Referenced by [879].] [Article] Court
[596] 24-Aug-2009 Order of Recusal Judge Dale A. Kimball recused. Case reassigned to Judge Ted Stewart for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 24-Aug-2009. [Article]
[Article]
Court
[597] 29-Oct-2009 Mandate of USCA as to [567] Notice of Appeal(08-4217), filed by SCO Group According to the USCA the judgment of the USDC for the Dist of UT is Affirmed in Part and Reversed in Part. Judgment included with mandate: Yes. Case Reopened. Case is Remanded for trial. (Attachments: # (1) Judgment, # (2) Mandate Cover Letter) (jmr) (Entered: 02-Nov-2009) [Referenced by [601].] SCO
[598] 02-Nov-2009 Notice of Hearing: (Notice generated by Chambers/slm) Status Conference set for 23-Nov-2009 10:00 AM in Room 142 before Judge Ted Stewart. (slm) [Article]
[Article]
Court
[599] 03-Nov-2009 Amended Notice of Hearing: (Notice generated by Chambers/slm) Status Conference Reset for 01-Dec-2009 01:30 PM in Room 142 before Judge Ted Stewart. (slm) [Article] Court
[600] 10-Nov-2009 Notice of Related Proceeding by Novell, Inc. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C) (Sneddon, Heather) [Referenced by [602] [604].] [Article] Novell
[601] 17-Nov-2009 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Jonathan Lee Riches, inmate no longer at facility, unable to forward. Document #[597] attached but not scanned here - already on docket. (djs) Court
[602] 24-Nov-2009 Response re [600] Notice (Other), filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Referenced by [603].] [Article] SCO
[603] 24-Nov-2009 Affidavit of Brent O. Hatch in Support re [602] Response (NOT to motion) filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit G) (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[604] 30-Nov-2009 Response re [600] Notice (Other), filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Sneddon, Heather) [Article] Novell
[605] 01-Dec-2009 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ted Stewart: Scheduling Conference held on 01-Dec-2009. The Court sets a Final Pretrial Conference for 25-Feb-2010 02:00 PM and a 3-week Jury Trial for 08-Mar-2010 08:30 AM in Room 142 before Judge Ted Stewart. Counsel will meet to determine other dates and deadlines, and Mr. Hatch will submit an order for the Court's signature reflecting those dates. Attorney for Plaintiff: Brent Hatch, Edward Normand, Mauricio Gonzalez, Attorney for Defendant Michael Jacobs, Thomas Karrenberg. Appearing by phone: Judge Edward Cahn, Trusee; and Bonnie Fatelle Court Reporter: Kerry Sorensen. (slm) [Groklaw's Reports from the Hearing.] [Article] Court
[606] 10-Dec-2009 Ex Parte (Not Sealed) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney [For Dorsey & Whitney attorney John J. Brogan] filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) (Hatch, Brent) [Referenced by [607].] SCO
[607] 11-Dec-2009 Order granting [606] Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney John J. Brogan withdrawn from case for Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 10-Dec-2009 (alt) Court
[608] 22-Dec-2009 Motion to Set Aside Judgment filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Sneddon, Heather)
[Referenced by [609] [610] [611] [612] [619] [620].]
[Article] Novell
[609] 22-Dec-2009 Memorandum in Support re [608] Motion to Set Aside Judgment filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Sneddon, Heather) [Article] Novell
[610] 22-Dec-2009 Declaration of Grant L. Kim re [608] Motion to Set Aside Judgment filed by Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4) (Sneddon, Heather) [Article] Novell
[611] 04-Jan-2010 Notice of Hearing on Motion re: [277] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title Based on Failure to Establish Special Damages and [608] Motion to Set Aside Judgment: (Notice generated by Chambers) Motion Hearing set for 04-Feb-2010 03:00 PM in Room 142 before Judge Ted Stewart. By 07-Jan-2010 at 5:00 p.m., the parties shall submit to chambers (Room 148) a courtesy copy of all filings related to [277] Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title Based on Failure to Establish Special Damages. (tco) [Article] Court
[612] 05-Jan-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [608] Motion to Set Aside Judgment filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix of Unpublished Cases) (Normand, Edward) [Text] SCO
[613] 06-Jan-2010 Amended Scheduling Order: Final Pretrial Conference set for 25-Feb-2010 02:00 PM in Room 142 before Judge Ted Stewart. 15 day Jury Trial set for 08-Mar-2010 08:30 AM in Room 142 before Judge Ted Stewart. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 06-Jan-2010. (asp) [Text] Court
[614] 06-Jan-2010 Notice of Appearance by David R. Wright on behalf of Novell, Inc. (Wright, David) [Article] Novell
[615] 06-Jan-2010 Notice of Appearance by Sterling Arthur Brennan on behalf of Novell, Inc. (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[616] 06-Jan-2010 Notice of Appearance by Kirk R. Harris on behalf of Novell, Inc. (Harris, Kirk) [Article] Novell
[617] 06-Jan-2010 Notice of Appearance by Cara J. Baldwin on behalf of Novell, Inc. (Baldwin, Cara) [Article] Novell
[618] 15-Jan-2010 Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel of David E. Melaugh on behalf of Novell, Inc. (Melaugh, David) Novell
[619] 22-Jan-2010 Reply to Response to Motion re [608] Motion to Set Aside Judgment filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Text] Novell
[620] 28-Jan-2010 Memorandum Decision denying [608] Motion to Set Aside Judgment. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 28-Jan-2010. (asp) [Text] Court
[621] 28-Jan-2010 Memorandum Decision granting in part and denying in part [277] Motion for Summary Judgment ; The hearing set for February 4, 2010, is Stricken. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 28-Jan-2010. (asp) [Text] Court
[622] 01-Feb-2010 Proposed Exhibit List and Witness List (Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures) by Defendant Novell, Inc... (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-1, # (2) Exhibit A-2, # (3) Exhibit B, # (4) Exhibit C-1, # (5) Exhibit C-2) (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[623] 01-Feb-2010 Proposed Exhibit List and Witness List (Supplemental Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures) by Plaintiff SCO Group.. (Normand, Edward) [Article] SCO
[624] 02-Feb-2010 Proposed Exhibit List and Witness List (Amended Supplemental Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures) by Plaintiff SCO Group.. (Normand, Edward) [Article] SCO
[625] 03-Feb-2010 Proposed Exhibit List and Witness List (Second Amended Supplemental Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures) by Plaintiff SCO Group.. (Normand, Edward) [Referenced by [661] [736].] [Article] SCO
[626] 04-Feb-2010 Trial Order with instructions to counsel: 15 day Jury Trial set for 08-Mar-2010 08:30 AM in Room 142 before Judge Ted Stewart. Final Pretrial Conference set for 25-Feb-2010 02:00 PM in Room 142 before Judge Ted Stewart. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 04-Feb-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[627] 06-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 1 to Exclude Evidence and Argument Concerning Claims Not Included in SCO's Appeal or the Tenth Circuit's Limited Mandate filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1-Final Judgment, # (2) Exhibit 2-Tenth Circuit Opinion, # (3) Exhibit 3-SCO Appeal Brief, # (4) Exhibit 4-SCO Reply Brief, # (5) Exhibit 5-Ruling, # (6) Exhibit 6-Order) (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [628] [665] [669] [670] [674].]
[Text] Novell
[628] 08-Feb-2010 Docket Text Order Plaintiff is directed to respond to [627] Motion in Limine No. 1 to Exclude Evidence and Argument Concerning Claims Not Included in SCO's Appeal or the Tenth Circuit's Limited Mandate filed by Novell, Inc., by February 12, 2010 at 5:00 p.m. No attached document. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 08-Feb-2010. (tco) [Article] Court
[629] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 2 to Determine that First Amendment Defenses Apply to Slander of Title filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 2A, # (2) Exhibit 2B, # (3) Exhibit 2C) (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [665] [682] [730] [762].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[630] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 3 to Determine that SCO is a Limited Purpose Public Figure filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 3A [PJ: This is a copy of SCO v. IBM Docket #398, which we already have here.], # (2) Exhibit 3B, # (3) Exhibit 3C, # (4) Exhibit 3D, # (5) Exhibit 3E [PJ: This is a copy of SCO's Letter to Linux Users, which we already have here.], # (6) Exhibit 3F-Under Seal, # (7) Exhibit 3G, # (8) Exhibit 3H, # (9) Exhibit 3I, # (10) Exhibit 3J, # (11) Exhibit 3K, # (12) Exhibit 3L, # (13) Exhibit 3M, # (14) Exhibit 3N, # (15) Exhibit 3O, # (16) Exhibit 3P-Under Seal, # (17) Exhibit 3Q, # (18) Exhibit 3R, # (19) Exhibit 3S [PJ: 3R and 3S are under seal.]) (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [652] [664] [665] [683] [730] [762].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[631] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 4 to Preclude SCO from Contesting that Novell had an Objectively Reasonable, Good Faith Basis for its Statements Regarding Copyright Ownership filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 4A) (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [665] [684] [724] [775].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[632] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 5 to Preclude SCO from Relying on Novell's June and August 2003 Statements as Factual Assertions of Copyright Ownership filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 5A, # (2) Exhibit 5B, # (3) Exhibit 5C, # (4) Exhibit 5D) (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [665] [685] [710].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[633] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 7 to Determine that Common Law Privileges Apply to Allegedly Defamatory Publications filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 7A, # (2) Exhibit 7B, # (3) Exhibit 7C, # (4) Exhibit 7D, # (5) Exhibit 7E, # (6) Exhibit 7F) (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [665] [687] [704].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[634] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 8 to Preclude SCO from Relying on Novell's Applications for Copyright Registration filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [665] [688] [725].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[635] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 10 to Preclude SCO from Presenting Argument Relating to Issues Stayed Pending Arbitration filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 10A [PJ: This is a copy of Docket [139], which we already have here.], # (2) Exhibit 10B [PJ: This is a copy of Docket [379], which we also have here.]) (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [665] [690] [716].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[636] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 11 to Exclude Evidence of Substantial Performance filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 11A) (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [665] [691] [728].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[637] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 12 to Exclude Certain Testimony from William Broderick for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 12A) (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [665] [692] [717].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[638] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 13 to Exclude Certain Testimony From Lawrence Bouffard for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 13A-Under Seal) (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [653] [663] [665] [693] [717].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[639] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No.14 to Exclude Certain Testimony from Jean Acheson for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 14A) (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [665] [694] [717].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[640] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 15 to Exclude Certain Testimony from Robert Frankenberg for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 15A) (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [665] [695] [717].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[641] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 16 to Exclude Certain Testimony from R. Duff Thompson for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 16A, # (2) Exhibit 16B, # (3) Exhibit 16C) (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [665] [696] [717].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[642] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 17 to Exclude Certain Testimony from Ty Mattingly for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 17A) (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [665] [697] [717].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[643] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 1 filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Normand, Edward)
[Referenced by [665] [675] [708].]
[Text] SCO
[644] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 18 to Exclude Certain Testimony from Douglas Michels for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 18A) (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [665] [698] [717].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[645] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 2 filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Normand, Edward)
[Referenced by [665] [676] [709].]
[Text] SCO
[646] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 3 filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Normand, Edward)
[Referenced by [665] [677] [728].]
[Text] SCO
[647]
[Pending]
08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 4 filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Normand, Edward)
[Referenced by [665] [678] [713].]
[Text] SCO
[648] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No.19 to Exclude Certain Testimony from Edward Chatlos, Burt Levine, and Kim Madsen for Lack of Personal Knowledge filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 19A-Under Seal, # (2) Exhibit 19B-Under Seal, # (3) Exhibit 19C [PJ: Note [666], below, that this was mistakenly filed, as it's different excerpts from the Burt Levine deposition; it has been replaced with this 19C, assuming the court agrees.], # (4) Exhibit 19D) (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [654] [662] [665] [699] [717].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[649] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 5 filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4) (Normand, Edward)
[Referenced by [665] [679] [712].]
[Text] SCO
[650] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 9 to Preclude SCO from Contesting that Agreements that Post-Date the APA May Constitute SVRX Licenses filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [665] [689] [711].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[651] 08-Feb-2010 Motion in Limine No. 6 to Preclude Reliance on Statements in December 2003 and March 2004 that do not Constitute Factual Assertions of Copyright Ownership filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 6A, # (2) Exhibit 6B, # (3) Exhibit 6C) (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [665] [686] [710].]
[Article]
[Text]
Novell
[652] 08-Feb-2010 Notice of Conventional Filing of Exhibits 3F, 3P, 3R, and 3S to filed by Defendant Novell, Inc. re [630] Motion in Limine No. 3 to Determine that SCO is a Limited Purpose Public Figure (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[653] 08-Feb-2010 Notice of Conventional Filing of Exhibit 13A filed by Defendant Novell, Inc. re [638] Motion in Limine No. 13 to Exclude Certain Testimony From Lawrence Bouffard for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[654] 08-Feb-2010 Notice of Conventional Filing of Exhibits 19A and 19B filed by Defendant Novell, Inc. re [648] Motion in Limine No.19 to Exclude Certain Testimony from Edward Chatlos, Burt Levine, and Kim Madsen for Lack of Personal Knowledge (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[655] 08-Feb-2010 Motion for Daubert Hearing to Disqualify Dr. Christine A. Botosan filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [656] [665] [701] [732] [746].]
[Article]
[Article]
Novell
[656] 08-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Support re [655] Motion for Daubert Hearing to Disqualify Dr. Christine A. Botosan filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C-Part1, # (4) Exhibit C-Part 2, # (5) Exhibit D, # (6) Exhibit E, # (7) Exhibit F, # (8) Exhibit G, # (9) Exhibit H, # (10) Exhibit I) (Brennan, Sterling) [Article]
[Article]
Novell
[657] 08-Feb-2010 Motion for Daubert Hearing to Disqualify Dr. Gary Pisano filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [658] [665] [702] [732] [747].]
[Article]
[Article]
Novell
[658] 08-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Support re [657] Motion for Daubert Hearing to Disqualify Dr. Gary Pisano filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D) (Brennan, Sterling) [Article]
[Article]
Novell
[659] 08-Feb-2010 Motion for Daubert Hearing to Disqualify G. Gervaise Davis III filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order) (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [660] [665] [700] [732] [745].]
[Article]
[Article]
Novell
[660] 08-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Support re [659] Motion for Daubert Hearing to Disqualify G. Gervaise Davis III filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A) (Brennan, Sterling) [Article]
[Article]
Novell
[661] 08-Feb-2010 Objections to [625] Exhibit List(Proposed) Second Amended Supplemental Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A) (Brennan, Sterling) [Article]
[Article]
Novell
[662] 08-Feb-2010 [Sealed] Exhibits 19A and 19B re [648] Motion in Limine No.19 to Exclude Certain Testimony from Edward Chatlos, Burt Levine, and Kim Madsen for Lack of Personal Knowledge filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (asp) (Entered: 09-Feb-2010) [Article] Novell
[663] 08-Feb-2010 [Sealed] Exhibit 13A re [638] Motion in Limine No. 13 to Exclude Certain Testimony From Lawrence Bouffard for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (asp) (Entered: 09-Feb-2010) [Article] Novell
[664] 08-Feb-2010 [Sealed] Exhibits 3F, 3P, 3R and 3S re [630] Motion in Limine No. 3 to Determine that SCO is a Limited Purpose Public Figure filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (asp) (Entered: 09-Feb-2010) [Article] Novell
[665] 09-Feb-2010 Notice of Hearing on Motion re:
[634] Motion in Limine No. 8 to Preclude SCO from Relying on Novell's Applications for Copyright Registration,
[629] Motion in Limine No. 2 to Determine that First Amendment Defenses Apply to Slander of Title,
[659] Motion for Daubert Hearing to Disqualify G. Gervaise Davis III, [649] Motion in Limine No. 5,
[644] Motion in Limine No. 18 to Exclude Certain Testimony from Douglas Michels for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule,
[636] Motion in Limine No. 11 to Exclude Evidence of Substantial Performance,
[635] Motion in Limine No. 10 to Preclude SCO from Presenting Argument Relating to Issues Stayed Pending Arbitration,
[650] Motion in Limine No. 9 to Preclude SCO from Contesting that Agreements that Post-Date the APA May Constitute SVRX Licenses,
[637] Motion in Limine No. 12 to Exclude Certain Testimony from William Broderick for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule,
[655] Motion for Daubert Hearing to Disqualify Dr. Christine A. Botosan,
[642] Motion in Limine No. 17 to Exclude Certain Testimony from Ty Mattingly for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule,
[657] Motion for Daubert Hearing to Disqualify Dr. Gary Pisano,
[630] Motion in Limine No. 3 to Determine that SCO is a Limited Purpose Public Figure,
[631] Motion in Limine No. 4 to Preclude SCO from Contesting that Novell had an Objectively Reasonable, Good Faith Basis for its Statements Regarding Copyright Ownership,
[646] Motion in Limine No. 3,
[627] Motion in Limine No. 1 to Exclude Evidence and Argument Concerning Claims Not Included in SCO's Appeal or the Tenth Circuit's Limited Mandate,
[641] Motion in Limine No. 16 to Exclude Certain Testimony from R. Duff Thompson for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule,
[651] Motion in Limine No. 6 to Preclude Reliance on Statements in December 2003 and March 2004 that do not Constitute Factual Assertions of Copyright Ownership,
[645] Motion in Limine No. 2,
[647] Motion in Limine No. 4,
[633] Motion in Limine No. 7 to Determine that Common Law Privileges Apply to Allegedly Defamatory Publications,
[638] Motion in Limine No. 13 to Exclude Certain Testimony From Lawrence Bouffard for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule,
[632] Motion in Limine No. 5 to Preclude SCO from Relying on Novell's June and August 2003 Statements as Factual Assertions of Copyright Ownership,
[640] Motion in Limine No. 15 to Exclude Certain Testimony from Robert Frankenberg for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule,
[639] Motion in Limine No.14 to Exclude Certain Testimony from Jean Acheson for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule,
[648] Motion in Limine No.19 to Exclude Certain Testimony from Edward Chatlos, Burt Levine, and Kim Madsen for Lack of Personal Knowledge,
[643] Motion in Limine No. 1 : (Notice generated by Chambers/slm) Motion Hearing set for 25-Feb-2010 beginning 09:00 AM in Room 142 before Judge Ted Stewart.
Please Note that the Final Pretrial Conference for this Case is also set this day at 2:00 P.M. (slm)
[Article] Court
[666] 11-Feb-2010 Errata to [648] Motion in Limine No.19 to Exclude Certain Testimony from Edward Chatlos, Burt Levine, and Kim Madsen for Lack of Personal Knowledge filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 19C) (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[667] 11-Feb-2010 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Daniel P. Muino, Registration fee $ 15, receipt number 10880000000001053899, filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Application for Admission, # (2) ECF Registration, # 3 Text of Proposed Order) (Brennan, Sterling) [Referenced by [668].] Novell
[668] 12-Feb-2010 Order granting [667] Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Daniel P. Muino for Novell, Inc.. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice may download a copy of the District of Utahs local rules from the courts web site at http://www.utd.uscourts.gov . Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 11-Feb-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[669] 12-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [627] Motion in Limine No. 1 to Exclude Evidence and Argument Concerning Claims Not Included in SCO's Appeal or the Tenth Circuit's Limited Mandate filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit G) (Hatch, Brent) [Referenced by [670].] [Text] SCO
[670] 15-Feb-2010 Motion for Leave to File Reply to SCO's Opposition [669] to Novell's Motion [627] in Limine No. 1 filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-Reply [Text], # (2) Text of Proposed Order) (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [671] [672] [673].]
[Article] Novell
[671] 16-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [670] Motion for Leave to File Reply to SCO's Opposition to Novell's Motion in Limine No. 1 filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A) (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[672] 16-Feb-2010 Amended Memorandum in Opposition re [670] Motion for Leave to File Reply to SCO's Opposition to Novell's Motion in Limine No. 1 filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A) (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[673] 16-Feb-2010 Order denying [670] Motion for Leave to File. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 16-Feb-2010. No attached document. (tco) [Article] Court
[674] 18-Feb-2010 Memorandum Decision denying [627] Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 18-Feb-2010. (asp) [Text] Court
[675] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [643] Motion in Limine No. 1 to Preclude Misleading Statements or Evidence Concerning Language in APA Removed by Amendment No. 2 filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1A, # (2) Exhibit 1B, # (3) Exhibit 1C) (Brennan, Sterling) [Text] Novell
[676] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [645] Motion in Limine No. 2 re Reversed Rulings filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Text] Novell
[677] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [646] Motion in Limine No. 3 re Novell's Monetary Judgment Against SCO filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Text] Novell
[678] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [647] Motion in Limine No. 4 to Exclude Reference to Litigation Commentary filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 4A-Filed Under Seal, # (2) Exhibit 4B, # (3) Exhibit 4C-Filed Under Seal, # (4) Exhibit 4D-Filed Under Seal) (Brennan, Sterling) [Referenced by [680] [715].] [Text] Novell
[679] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [649] Motion in Limine No. 5 to Exclude Statements Made by Michael Anderer as an Independent Contractor for SCO filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 5A-Filed Under Seal, # (2) Exhibit 5B-Filed Under Seal, # (3) Exhibit 5C-Filed Under Seal) (Brennan, Sterling) [Referenced by [681] [714].] [Text] Novell
[680] 19-Feb-2010 Notice of Conventional Filing of Exhibits 4A, 4C, and 4D to filed by Defendant Novell, Inc. re [678] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, in Limine No. 4 (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[681] 19-Feb-2010 Notice of Conventional Filing of Exhibits 5A, 5B, and 5C filed by Defendant Novell, Inc. re [679] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, in Limine No. 5 (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[682] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [629] Motion in Limine No. 2 to Determine that First Amendment Defenses Apply to Slander of Title filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Appendix of Unpublished Cases) (Hatch, Brent) [Text] SCO
[683] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [630] Motion in Limine No. 3 to Determine that SCO is a Limited Purpose Public Figure filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Text] SCO
[684] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [631] Motion in Limine No. 4 to Preclude SCO from Contesting that Novell had an Objectively Reasonable, Good Faith Basis for its Statements Regarding Copyright Ownership filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Text] SCO
[685] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [632] Motion in Limine No. 5 to Preclude SCO from Relying on Novell's June and August 2003 Statements as Factual Assertions of Copyright Ownership filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix of Unpublished Cases) (Hatch, Brent) [Text] SCO
[686] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [651] Motion in Limine No. 6 to Preclude Reliance on Statements in December 2003 and March 2004 that do not Constitute Factual Assertions of Copyright Ownership filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Appendix of Unpublished Cases) (Hatch, Brent) [Text] SCO
[687] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [633] Motion in Limine No. 7 to Determine that Common Law Privileges Apply to Allegedly Defamatory Publications filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Text] SCO
[688] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [634] Motion in Limine No. 8 to Preclude SCO from Relying on Novell's Applications for Copyright Registration filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[689] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [650] Motion in Limine No. 9 to Preclude SCO from Contesting that Agreements that Post-Date the APA May Constitute SVRX Licenses filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Text] SCO
[690] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [635] Motion in Limine No. 10 to Preclude SCO from Presenting Argument Relating to Issues Stayed Pending Arbitration filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Text] SCO
[691] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [636] Motion in Limine No. 11 to Exclude Evidence of Substantial Performance filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix of Unpublished Cases) (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[692] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [637] Motion in Limine No. 12 to Exclude Certain Testimony from William Broderick for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2) (Hatch, Brent) [Text] SCO
[693] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [638] Motion in Limine No. 13 to Exclude Certain Testimony From Lawrence Bouffard for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Filed Under Seal) (Hatch, Brent) [Referenced by [703] [718].] [Text] SCO
[694] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [639] Motion in Limine No.14 to Exclude Certain Testimony from Jean Acheson for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1) (Hatch, Brent) [Text] SCO
[695] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [640] Motion in Limine No. 15 to Exclude Certain Testimony from Robert Frankenberg for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1) (Hatch, Brent) [Text] SCO
[696] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [641] Motion in Limine No. 16 to Exclude Certain Testimony from R. Duff Thompson for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2) (Hatch, Brent) [Text] SCO
[697] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [642] Motion in Limine No. 17 to Exclude Certain Testimony from Ty Mattingly for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1) (Hatch, Brent) [Text] SCO
[698] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [644] Motion in Limine No. 18 to Exclude Certain Testimony from Douglas Michels for Lack of Personal Knowledge and Violation of Parol Evidence Rule filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2) (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[699] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [648] Motion in Limine No.19 to Exclude Certain Testimony from Edward Chatlos, Burt Levine, and Kim Madsen for Lack of Personal Knowledge filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5) (Hatch, Brent) [Referenced by [705] [719].] [Article] SCO
[700] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [659] Motion for Daubert Hearing to Disqualify G. Gervaise Davis III filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Appendix of Unpublished Cases) (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[701] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [655] Motion for Daubert Hearing to Disqualify Dr. Christine A. Botosan filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Expert Report of Christine Botosan - Filed Under Seal, # (2) Rebuttal Report of Christine Botosan - Filed Under Seal, # (3) Declaration of Christine Botosan - Filed Under Seal, # (4) Appendix of Unpublished Cases) (Hatch, Brent)
[Referenced by [706] [720] [721].]
[Article] SCO
[702] 19-Feb-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [657] Motion for Daubert Hearing to Disqualify Dr. Gary Pisano filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Expert Report of Dr. Gary Pisano - Filed Under Seal, # (2) Rebuttal Report of Dr. Gary Pisano - Filed Under Seal, # (3) Appendix of Unpublished Cases) (Hatch, Brent)
[Referenced by [707] [722] [723].]
[Article] SCO
[703] 22-Feb-2010 Notice of Conventional Filing of Exhibit 1 filed by Plaintiff SCO Group re [693] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[704] 22-Feb-2010 Memorandum Decision denying [633] Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 22-Feb-2010. (asp) [Text] Court
[705] 22-Feb-2010 Notice of Conventional Filing of Exhibit 2 filed by Plaintiff SCO Group re [699] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[706] 22-Feb-2010 Notice of Conventional Filing of Expert Report, Rebuttal Report and Declaration of Dr. Christine Botosan, filed by Plaintiff SCO Group re [701] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[707] 22-Feb-2010 Notice of Conventional Filing of Expert Report and Rebuttal Report of Dr. Gary Pisano filed by Plaintiff SCO Group re [702] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[708] 22-Feb-2010 Order on Motion in Limine. Memorandum Decision denying [643] Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 22-Feb-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[709] 22-Feb-2010 Order on Motion in Limine. Memorandum Decision granting [645] Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 22-Feb-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[710] 22-Feb-2010 Order on Motion in Limine. Memorandum Decision denying [632] Motion in Limine; denying [651] Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 22-Feb-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[711] 22-Feb-2010 Order on Motion in Limine. Memorandum Decision granting [650] Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 22-Feb-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[712] 22-Feb-2010 Order on Motion in Limine. Memorandum Decision granting in part and denying in part [649] Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 22-Feb-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[713] 22-Feb-2010 Order on Motion in Limine. Memorandum Decision taking under advisement [647] Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 22-Feb-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[714] 19-Feb-2010 [Sealed] Exhibits A-C re [679] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (asp) (Entered: 22-Feb-2010) Novell
[715] 19-Feb-2010 [Sealed] Exhibits A, C, D re [678] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (asp) (Entered: 22-Feb-2010) Novell
[716] 22-Feb-2010 Order on Motion in Limine. Memorandum Decision granting [635] Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 22-Feb-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[717] 22-Feb-2010 Order on Motion in Limine. Memorandum Decision granting in part and denying in part [637] Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part [638] Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part [639] Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part [640] Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part [641] Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part [642] Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part [644] Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part [648] Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 22-Feb-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[718] 23-Feb-2010 [Sealed] Exhibit 1 re [693] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (asp) [Article] SCO
[719] 23-Feb-2010 [Sealed] Exhibit 2 re [699] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (asp) [Article] SCO
[720] 23-Feb-2010 [Sealed] Exhibit 3 re [701] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (asp) [Article] SCO
[721] 23-Feb-2010 [Sealed] Exhibit 4 re [701] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (asp) [Article] SCO
[722] 23-Feb-2010 [Sealed] Exhibit 3 re [702] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (asp) [Article] SCO
[723] 23-Feb-2010 [Sealed] Exhibit 2 re [702] Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (asp) [Article] SCO
[724] 23-Feb-2010 Memorandum Decision granting [631] Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 23-Feb-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[725] 23-Feb-2010 Memorandum Decision denying [634] Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 23-Feb-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[726] 23-Feb-2010 Proposed Voir Dire by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Text] Novell
[727] 23-Feb-2010 Proposed Voir Dire by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Text] SCO
[728] 24-Feb-2010 Memorandum Decision denying [636] Motion in Limine; granting [646] Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 23-Feb-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[729] 24-Feb-2010 Request for Judicial Notice of Prior Factual Findings filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling)
[Referenced by [749] [758] [763].]
[Article] Novell
[730] 25-Feb-2010 Order denying [629] Motion in Limine; denying [630] Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 25-Feb-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[731] 25-Feb-2010 Pretrial Order: 3 Week Jury Trial set for 08-Mar-2010 08:30 AM in Room 142 before Judge Ted Stewart. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 25-Feb-2010. (asp) [Text] Court
[732] 25-Feb-2010 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ted Stewart: Motion Hearing held on 25-Feb-2010 re [657] Motion for Daubert Hearing to Disqualify Dr. Gary Pisano filed by Novell, Inc., [655] Motion for Daubert Hearing to Disqualify Dr. Christine A. Botosan filed by Novell, Inc., [659] Motion for Daubert Hearing to Disqualify G. Gervaise Davis III filed by Novell, Inc.. The Court hears argument on the 3 daubert motions filed by defendant, and takes the motions under advisement. Attorney for Plaintiff: Brent Hatch, Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Jason Cyrulnik, Attorney for Defendant Sterling Brennan, Eric Acker, Michael Jacobs. Court Reporter: Patti Walker. (slm) [Groklaw's Reports from the Hearing, Transcript [756] [885].] [Article] Court
[733] 25-Feb-2010 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ted Stewart: Final Pretrial Conference held on 25-Feb-2010. Defendant asks for judicial notice regarding Judge Kimball's and the 10th Circuit's prior findings on this case. The Court asks counsel to avoid reference to these findings without prior notice to the Court. The parties report that they do not agree on specifically what should be decided by the Court, and what should go to the jury. The Court asks counsel to submit their understanding of the issues referred to in the pretrial order by Tuesday, March 2; with responses due by Thursday, March 4. The Court outlines its preferred trial procedures and deadlines. Counsel are asked to review the section of "Courtroom Conduct" in the Court's trial order. Counsel raise 1st amendment issues, and they are instructed to submit any motions regarding this issue by Tuesday, March 2, with responses due Thursday, March 4. Attorney for Plaintiff: Brent Hatch, Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Jason Cyrulnik, Attorney for Defendant Sterling Brennan, Eric Acker, Michael Jacobs. Court Reporter: Patti Walker. (slm) [Groklaw's Reports from the Hearing, Transcript [756] [885].] [Referenced by [749] [750].] [Article] Court
[734] 26-Feb-2010 Documents Lodged consisting of Letter from Sterling A. Brennan. (asp) [Text] Novell
[735] 25-Feb-2010 Order Setting Briefing Schedule: Novell may file a brief in support of the Request by 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, March 2, 2010 and Plaintiff and counterclaim defendant The SCO Group may file a brief in response to Novell's brief by 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, March 4, 2010. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 25-Feb-2010. (asp) (Entered: 26-Feb-2010) [Article] Court
[736] 01-Mar-2010 Objections to [625] Exhibit List(Proposed) Second Amended Supplemental Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A) (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[737] 01-Mar-2010 Proposed Jury Verdict by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Referenced by [772].] [Article] Novell
[738] 01-Mar-2010 Trial Brief by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[739] 01-Mar-2010 Proposed Jury Instructions by SCO Group, Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Referenced by [774].] [Article] SCO
Novell
[740] 01-Mar-2010 Proposed Jury Instructions by Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Referenced by [772].] [Article] Novell
[741] 01-Mar-2010 Proposed Jury Verdict by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Referenced by [773].] [Article] SCO
[742] 01-Mar-2010 Trial Brief by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix A, # (2) Appendix of Unpublished Cases) (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[743] 01-Mar-2010 Proposed Jury Instructions by SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Referenced by [774].] [Article] SCO
[744] 02-Mar-2010 Objections to Novell's Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A) (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[745] 02-Mar-2010 Memorandum Decision denying [659] Motion for Daubert Hearing. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 02-Mar-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[746] 02-Mar-2010 Memorandum Decision denying [655] Motion for Daubert Hearing. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 02-Mar-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[747] 02-Mar-2010 Memorandum Decision denying [657] Motion for Daubert Hearing. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 02-Mar-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[748] 02-Mar-2010 Motion to Determine that First Amendment Defenses Apply to Slander of Title and Require Proof of Constitutional Malice filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Errata 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3) (Brennan, Sterling) [Referenced by [759] [762].] Novell
[749] 02-Mar-2010 Brief re [733] Pretrial Conference - Final,,,, [729] Request for Judicial Notice of Prior Factual Findings filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Referenced by [758].] [Article] Novell
[750] 02-Mar-2010 Submission Addressing Allocation of Issues for Bench and Jury Trial Brief re [733] Pretrial Conference - Final,,,, filed by Plaintiff SCO Group, Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] SCO
Novell
[751] 02-Mar-2010 Brief Regarding Issues to be Tried in Equity by the Court filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[752] 02-Mar-2010 Documents Lodged consisting of Letter from Sterling A. Brennan. (asp) (Entered: 03-Mar-2010) Novell
[753] 03-Mar-2010 Proposed Voir Dire by Plaintiff SCO Group, Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Hatch, Brent) [Text] SCO
Novell
[754] 03-Mar-2010 Proposed Exhibit List (Second Amended Supplemental Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures) by Plaintiff SCO Group.. (Hatch, Brent) SCO
[755] 03-Mar-2010 Proposed Witness List Amended Supplemental Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures by Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-1, # (2) Exhibit A-2, # (3) Exhibit B) (Brennan, Sterling) Novell
[756] 04-Mar-2010 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript of Proceedings held on February 25, 2010-Motion Hearing before Judge Ted Stewart. Court Reporter/Transcriber Patti Walker, CSR, RPR, CP, Telephone number 801-364-5440.
Notice Re Redaction of Transcripts: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 25-Mar-2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 05-Apr-2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 02-Jun-2010. (jmr) [Minutes [732], [733].] [Referenced by [885].]
[Text] Court

[758] 04-Mar-2010 Response re [729] Request, [749] Brief, to Novell's Request for Judicial Notice filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Text] SCO
[759] 04-Mar-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [748] Motion to Determine that First Amendment Defenses Apply to Slander of Title and Require Proof of Constitutional Malice filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix of Unpublished Cases) (Hatch, Brent) [Text] SCO
[760] 05-Mar-2010 Memorandum Addressing Novell's Request for Advisory Verdict filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) SCO
[761] 05-Mar-2010 Memorandum Decision and Order on Allocation of Issues for Bench and Jury Trial. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 05-Mar-2010. (ce) [Article] Court
[762] 05-Mar-2010 Memorandum Decision granting [748] Motion to Determine that First Amendment Defenses Apply to Slander of Title and Require Proof of Constitutional Malice. Defendant's [629] Motions in Limine No. 2 to Determine that First Amendment Defenses Apply to Slander of Title filed by Defendant Novell, Inc. and [630] Motion in Limine No. 3 to Determine that SCO is a Limited Purpose Public Figure filed by Defendant Novell, Inc. are granted. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 05-Mar-2010. (ce) [Text] Court
[763] 05-Mar-2010 Memorandum Decision Denying Defendant's [729] Request for Judicial Notice of Prior Factual Findings. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 05-Mar-2010. (ce) [Article] Court
[764] 05-Mar-2010 Documents Lodged consisting of Letter from Brent O. Hatch to Judge Stewart re: videos and other demonstrative evidence to be used in opening statement. (ce) [Article] SCO
[765] 05-Mar-2010 Documents Lodged consisting of Letter from Brent O. Hatch re: trial matters. (ce) [Article] SCO
[766] 05-Mar-2010 Memorandum Decision and Order Limiting Use of Deposition Testimony During Opening Statements. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 05-Mar-2010. (ce) [Article] Court
[767] 05-Mar-2010 Trial Brief (Amended) by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[768] 05-Mar-2010 Proposed Exhibit List by Defendant Novell, Inc... (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[769] 05-Mar-2010 Proposed Witness List (Will Call) by Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[770] 05-Mar-2010 Proposed Witness List (May Call) by Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[771] 05-Mar-2010 Proposed Witness List (Depositions) by Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[772] 05-Mar-2010 Objections to [740] Novell's Proposed Jury Instructions and [737] Verdict Form filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix of Unpublished Cases) (Hatch, Brent) [Referenced by [786].] [Article] SCO
[773] 06-Mar-2010 Objections to [741] Proposed Jury Verdict filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[774] 06-Mar-2010 Objections to [739] [Note: [739] is a joint document. This is more likely Objecting to [743].] Proposed Jury Instructions filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2) (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[775] 07-Mar-2010 Fourth Motion in Limine. Novell's Motion for Further Ruling on [631] Motion in Limine No. 4 to Preclude SCO From Contesting that Novell Had An Objectively Reasonable, Good Faith Basis for Its Statements Regarding Copyright Ownership filed by Counter Claimant Novell, Inc., Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Referenced by [781].] [Text] Novell
[776] 07-Mar-2010 Memorandum Memorandum of Authorities Regarding Excusing Potential Jurors Having Knowledge Pertaining to This Dispute filed by Counter Claimant Novell, Inc., Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[777] 08-Mar-2010 Proposed Exhibit List by Plaintiff SCO Group.. (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[778] 08-Mar-2010 Proposed Witness List (Will Call) by SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[779] 08-Mar-2010 Proposed Witness List (May Call) by SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[780] 08-Mar-2010 Proposed Witness List (Depositions) by SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[781] 08-Mar-2010 Memorandum Decision denying [775] Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 08-Mar-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[782] 08-Mar-2010 Documents Lodged consisting of Letter from Sterling A. Brennan. (asp) [Article] Novell
[783] 08-Mar-2010 Memorandum of Point and Authorities Responding to SCO's Objection to Board Meeting Minutes filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[784] 08-Mar-2010 Reply Brief in Support of SCO's Objections to Novell's Proposed Jury Instructions filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B) (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[785] 08-Mar-2010 Reply Brief in Support of SCO's Objections to Novell's Proposed Verdict Form filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[786] 08-Mar-2010 Reply Brief re [772] Objections to Novell's Proposed Jury Instructions filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit E) (Brennan, Sterling) (Entered: 09-Mar-2010) [Article] Novell
[787] 09-Mar-2010 Proposed Jury Instructions by Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D) (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[788] 10-Mar-2010 Documents Lodged consisting of Letter from Brent Hatch. (asp) [Article] SCO
[789] 11-Mar-2010 Letter from US Supreme Court re: Notice of Petition for Writ of Certiorari re [567] Notice of Appeal. Supreme Court Case Number 09-1061. (jmr) [Article] Court
[790] 11-Mar-2010 Motion to Allow Evidence Responding to SCO's Allegation that Novell's Slander Continues "To This Very Day" filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-Trial Testimony, # (2) Exhibit B-Order) (Brennan, Sterling) [Referenced by [798].] [Text] Novell
[791] 12-Mar-2010 Documents Lodged consisting of Letter from Brent O. Hatch. (asp) [Text] SCO
[792] 12-Mar-2010 Documents Lodged consisting of Letter from Sterling A. Brennan. (asp) [Text] Novell
[793] 08-Mar-2010 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ted Stewart: Voir Dire held on 08-Mar-2010. 52 jurors are sworn and questioned. 13 jurors (one alternate) are sworn and seated. The jurors are released for the day, and trial will begin tomorrow morning at 8:30 a.m. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Brent Hatch, Attorney for Defendant Sterlilng Brennan, Eric Acker, Michael Jacobs. Court Reporter: Patti Walker. (slm) (Entered: 12-Mar-2010) [Note: Groklaw's Reports from the Trial, Transcript [854].] [Article] Court
[794] 09-Mar-2010 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ted Stewart: Jury Trial held on 09-Mar-2010. Counsel deliver opening statements, and the trial begins. Testimony heard, exhibits admitted. The jury is instructed on appropriate behavior and released for the day. Trial will continue tomorrow morning at 8;30 a.m. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Brent Hatch, Attorney for Defendant Sterling Brennan, Eric Acker, Michael Jacobs. Court Reporter: Patti Walker, Ed Young, Kelly Hicken. (slm) (Entered: 12-Mar-2010) [Note: Groklaw's Reports from the Trial, Transcript [855], [856].] [Article] Court
[795] 10-Mar-2010 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ted Stewart: Jury Trial held on 10-Mar-2010. Trial continues. Testimony heard, exhibits admitted. Trial will continue tomorrow morning. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Brent Hatch, Attorney for Defendant Sterling Brennan, Eric Acker, Michael Jacobs. Court Reporter: Patti Walker, Ray Fenlon, Ed Young. (slm) (Entered: 12-Mar-2010) [Note: Groklaw's Reports from the Trial, Transcript [857].] [Article] Court
[796] 11-Mar-2010 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ted Stewart: Jury Trial held on 11-Mar-2010. Trial continues. Testimony heard, exhibits admitted. The jury is released for the evening. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Brent Hatch, Attorney for Defendant Sterling Brennan, Eric Acker, Michael Jacobs. Court Reporter: Patti Walker, Ray Fenlon, Laura Robinson. (slm) (Entered: 12-Mar-2010) [Note: Groklaw's Reports from the Trial, Transcript [858].] [Article] Court
[797] 12-Mar-2010 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ted Stewart: Jury Trial held on 12-Mar-2010. Trial continues. Testimony heard, exhibits admitted. The Court reminds jurors that only a portion of the evidence is in and they are not to be making up their minds, nor discussing the case with anyone. Jurors released until Monday morning at 8:30 a.m. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Brent Hatch, Attorney for Defendant Sterling Brennan, Eric Acker, Michael Jacobs. Court Reporter: Patti Walker, Ray Fenlon, Laura Robinson. (slm) [Note: Groklaw's Reports from the Trial, Transcript [859].] [Article] Court
[798] 15-Mar-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [790] Motion to Allow Evidence Responding to SCO's Allegation that Novell's Slander Continues "To This Very Day" filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B)(Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[799] 15-Mar-2010 Order Denying Defendants Oral Motion for Mistrial. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 15-Mar-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[800] 15-Mar-2010 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ted Stewart: Jury Trial held on 15-Mar-2010. Our of the hearing of the jury, defendants move for a mistrial. The Court takes the matter under advisement. Trial continues. Testimony heard, exhibits admitted. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Brent Hatch, Attorney for Defendant Sterling Brennan, Eric Acker, Michael Jacobs. Court Reporter: Patti Walker, Kelly Hicken, Laura Robinson. (slm) [Note: Groklaw's Reports from the Trial, Transcript [860].] [Article] Court
[801] 15-Mar-2010 Notice of filing of Offer of Proof Regarding Prior Inconsistent Declaration of Steven Sabbath filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Attachment-Novell Trial Ex. Y23) (Brennan, Sterling) [Text] Novell
[802] 16-Mar-2010 Notice of filing of Opposition to SCO's Letter [806] to the Court of March 15, 2010, Regarding Admission of Deposition Testimony from the IBM Case filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[803] 16-Mar-2010 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Likely Objections to Dr. Gary A. Pisano Testimony filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A) (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[804] 16-Mar-2010 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Likely Objections to Dr. Christine A. Botosan Testimony filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C) (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[805] 17-Mar-2010 Motion to Allow Testimony Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 803(3) filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix of Unpublished Cases) (Hatch, Brent) Modified on 17-Mar-2010 changed docket text from Notice of Filing to Motion (asp). [Article] SCO
[806] 17-Mar-2010 Documents Lodged consisting of Letter from Brent Hatch. (asp) [Referenced by [802].] [Article] SCO
[807] 08-Mar-2010 [Sealed] Jury Panel Record. (slm) (Entered: 17-Mar-2010) Court
[808] 16-Mar-2010 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ted Stewart: Jury Trial held on 16-Mar-2010. Out of the presence of the jury the Court deals with pending requests/motions. Testimony heard, exhibits admitted. Trial to continue tomorrow morning at 8:30 a.m. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Brent Hatch, Attorney for Defendant Sterling Brennan, Eric Acker, Michael Jacobs. Court Reporter: various. (slm) (Entered: 17-Mar-2010) [Note: Groklaw's Reports from the Trial, Transcript [861].] Court
[809] 17-Mar-2010 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ted Stewart: Jury Trial held on 17-Mar-2010. Again, the Court addresses pending motions/requests of counsel. The jury is brought in and trial continues. Testimony heard, exhibits admitted. Trial will resume at 8:30 tomorrow morning. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Brent Hatch, Attorney for Defendant Sterling Brennan, Eric Acker, Michael Jacobs. Court Reporter: various. (slm) [Note: Groklaw's Reports from the Trial, Transcript [862].] [Article] Court
[810] 17-Mar-2010 Motion Renewed Motion Regarding Prior District Court Rulings filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[811] 18-Mar-2010 Proposed Jury Verdict by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[812] 18-Mar-2010 Proposed Jury Instructions by SCO Group, Novell, Inc.. (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
Novell
[813] 18-Mar-2010 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ted Stewart: Jury Trial held on 18-Mar-2010. Trial continues. Testimony heard, exhibits admitted. Trial will continue tomorrow morning at 8;30 a.m. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Brent Hatch, Attorney for Defendant Sterling Brennan, Eric Acker, Michael Jacobs. Court Reporter: E. Young, L. Robinson, Patti Walker. (slm) [Note: Groklaw's Reports from the Trial, Transcript [863].] [Article] Court
[814] 19-Mar-2010 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ted Stewart: Jury Trial held on 19-Mar-2010. Out of the hearing of the jury, trial issues are discussed and resolved. Testimony heard, exhibits admitted. The jury is again instructed on proper behavior and released for the weekend. Trial will continue Monday morning, 22-Mar-2010, at 8:30 a.m. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Brent Hatch, Attorney for Defendant Sterling Brennan, Eric Acker, Michael Jacobs. Court Reporter: L. Robinson, Becky Janke, Patti Walker. (slm) [Note: Groklaw's Reports from the Trial, Transcript [864].] [Article] Court
[815] 21-Mar-2010 Motion for Leave to Examine Its First Witness on Prior Rulings filed by Counter Claimant Novell, Inc., Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Referenced by [817].] [Article] Novell
[816] 21-Mar-2010 Objections to Novell's Designation of Testimony of Michael Defazio filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A) (Hatch, Brent) [Referenced by [820].] [Article] SCO
[817] 21-Mar-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [815] Motion for Leave to Examine Its First Witness on Prior Rulings filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix of Unpublished Cases) (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[818] 21-Mar-2010 Motion to Preclude SCO from Calling Troy Keller as a Witness filed by Counter Claimant Novell, Inc., Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[819] 21-Mar-2010 Memorandum of Points and Authorities on the Limitations on Novell's Trial Testimony Imposed by Novell's Own Privilege Objections filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7, # (8) Exhibit 8) (Hatch, Brent) [Referenced by [821] [824].] [Article] SCO
[820] 22-Mar-2010 Reply Brief Novell's Response to SCO's Objection [816] to Novell's Designation of Testimony of Michael DeFazio filed by Counter Claimant Novell, Inc., Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A) (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[821] 22-Mar-2010 Appendix to [819] Memorandum (Not to motion), Memorandum (Not to motion) filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[822] 22-Mar-2010 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ted Stewart: Jury Trial held on 22-Mar-2010. Week three of trial begins. Testimony heard, exhibits admitted. Trial will continue tomorrow morning at 8:30 a.m. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Brent Hatch, Attorney for Defendant Sterling Brennan, Eric Acker, Michael Jacobs. Court Reporter: P. Walker, E. Young, B. Janke. (slm) [Note: Groklaw's Reports from the Trial, Transcript [865].] [Article] Court
[823] 23-Mar-2010 Motion to Strike Testimony of Damages after June 9, 2004 filed by Counter Claimant Novell, Inc., Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Referenced by [825].] [Article] Novell
[824] 24-Mar-2010 Reply Brief. Novell's Response to SCO's Objection [819] to Certain Testimony of Tor Braham filed by Counter Claimant Novell, Inc., Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B) (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[825] 24-Mar-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [823] Motion to Strike Testimony of Damages after June 9, 2004 filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) SCO
[826] 24-Mar-2010 Proposed Jury Instructions by Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[827] 24-Mar-2010 Response to Jury Instructions filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[828] 24-Mar-2010 Motion to Strike Testimony That is Inconsistent with Unambiguous Contract Language filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Referenced by [831].] [Text] Novell
[829] 25-Mar-2010 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Novell'S Rule 50(A) Motion at the Close of Plaintiff's Case filed by Counter Claimant Novell, Inc., Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Referenced by [830].] [Text] Novell
[830] 25-Mar-2010 Memorandum Decision denying [829] Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 25-Mar-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[831] 25-Mar-2010 Memorandum Decision denying [828] Motion to Strike. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 25-Mar-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[832] 25-Mar-2010 Memorandum of Points and Authorities Concerning the Proper Scope of Closing Arguments filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[833] 26-Mar-2010 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Novell, Inc.'s Rule 50(a) Motion at the Close of all Evidence filed by Counter Claimant Novell, Inc., Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Referenced by [834] [838].] [Article] Novell
[834] 26-Mar-2010 Memorandum in Support re [833] Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Novell, Inc.'s Rule 50(a) Motion at the Close of all Evidence filed by Counter Claimant Novell, Inc., Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[835] 26-Mar-2010 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law SCO's Rule 50(a) Motion at the Close of all Evidence filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Referenced by [836] [839].] [Article] SCO
[836] 26-Mar-2010 Memorandum in Support re [835] Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law SCO's Rule 50(a) Motion at the Close of all Evidence filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Article] SCO
[837] 23-Mar-2010 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ted Stewart: Jury Trial held on 23-Mar-2010. Out of the jury's hearing, trial issues are resolved. Trial continues. Testimony heard, exhibits admditted. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, Ed Normand, Brent Hatch, Attorney for Defendant Sterling Brennan, Erick Acker, Michael Jacobs. Court Reporter: various. (slm) (Entered: 26-Mar-2010) [Note: Groklaw's Reports from the Trial, Transcript [866].] Court
[838] 26-Mar-2010 Memorandum Decision denying [833] Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 26-Mar-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[839] 26-Mar-2010 Memorandum Decision granting Plaintiff's oral Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; finding as moot [835] Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 26-Mar-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[840] 24-Mar-2010 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ted Stewart: Jury Trial held on 24-Mar-2010. Trial continues. Testimony heard, exhibits admitted. Jury released until tomorrow morning at 8:30 a.m. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Brent Hatch, Attorney for Defendant Sterling Brennan, Eric Acker, Michael Jacobs. Court Reporter: various. (slm) (Entered: 30-Mar-2010) [Note: Groklaw's Reports from the Trial, Transcript [867].] [Article] Court
[841] 25-Mar-2010 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ted Stewart: Jury Trial held on 25-Mar-2010. Outstanding issues are resolved out of the presence of the jury. Testimony heard, rebuttal witnesses called, and exhibits admitted. Both sides. The jury is released until tomorrow morning. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Brent Hatch, Attorney for Defendant Sterling Brennan, Eric Acker, Michael Jacobs. Court Reporter: various. (slm) (Entered: 30-Mar-2010) [Note: Groklaw's Reports from the Trial, Transcript [868], [886].] [Article] Court
[842] 26-Mar-2010 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ted Stewart: Jury Trial held on 26-Mar-2010. The Court instructs the jury, and closing statements are delivered. The jury is released to begin deliberations. At 5:30 p.m., the jury breaks for the week, and will return at 8:30 a.m. on Tuesday morning to continue deliberations. The Court gives cautionary instructions on proper behavior for jurors during deliberations. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Brent Hatch, Attorney for Defendant Sterling Brennan, Eric Acker, Michael Jacobs. Court Reporter: various. (slm) (Entered: 30-Mar-2010) [Note: Groklaw's Reports from the Trial, Transcript [869].] [Article] Court
[843] 29-Mar-2010 Order for Supplemental Jury Fees. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 29-Mar-2010. (asp) (Entered: 30-Mar-2010) [Article] Court
[844] 30-Mar-2010 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Ted Stewart: Jury Trial completed on 30-Mar-2010. Jury returns a verdict for Defendant Novell, Inc. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, Edward Normand, Brent Hatch, Attorney for Defendant Sterling Brennan, Eric Acker, Michael Jacobs. Court Reporter: Karen Murakami. (slm) [Note: Groklaw's Reports from the Trial.] [Article] Court
[845] 30-Mar-2010 Witness and Exhibit List, filed by Plaintiff SCO Group, Defendant Novell, Inc.. (slm) [Article] SCO
Novell
[846] 30-Mar-2010 Jury Verdict for Defendant Novell. (slm) [Article] Court
[847] 30-Mar-2010 Jury Instructions. (slm) [Article] Court
[848] 30-Mar-2010 [Sealed] Jury Notes. (slm) Modified on 30-Mar-2010: corrected to read "Jury Notes" (alt) [Article] Court
[849] 08-Mar-2010 [Sealed] Jury Seating Arrangement. (slm) (Entered: 30-Mar-2010) [Article] Court
[850] 15-Apr-2010 Motion for Extension of Time for filing Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Referenced by [851].] [Article] SCO
[851] 16-Apr-2010 Order granting [850] Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 16-Apr-2010. No attached document. (srs) [Article] Court
[852] 19-Apr-2010 Proposed Findings of Fact by Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2) (Brennan, Sterling) [Text] Novell
[853] 19-Apr-2010 Proposed Findings of Fact by SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Text]
[Article]
SCO
[854] 19-Apr-2010 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of March 8, 2010-Jury Trial-Jury Selection before Judge Ted Stewart, re [567] Notice of Appeal,. Court Reporter/Transcriber Patti Walker, CSR, RPR, CP, Telephone number (801)364-5440.
Notice Re Redaction of Transcripts: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 10-May-2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 20-May-2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 19-Jul-2010. (jmr) (Entered: 20-Apr-2010) [Minutes [793], [Static page].]
[Article]
[Article]
[Text]
Court
[855] 19-Apr-2010 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of March 9, 2010-Jury Trial(Part One) before Judge Ted Stewart, re [567] Notice of Appeal. Court Reporter/Transcriber Patti Walker, CSR, RPR, CP, Telephone number (801)364-5440.
Notice Re Redaction of Transcripts: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 10-May-2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 20-May-2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 19-Jul-2010. (jmr) Modified on 20-Apr-2010 to make transcript Part One (jmr). (Entered: 20-Apr-2010) [Minutes [794], [Static page].]
[Article]
[Text]
Court
[856] 19-Apr-2010 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of March 9, 2010-Jury Trial(Parts Two and Three) before Judge Ted Stewart, re [567] Notice of Appeal,. Court Reporter/Transcriber Patti Walker, Telephone number (801)364-5440.
Notice Re Redaction of Transcripts: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 10-May-2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 20-May-2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 19-Jul-2010. (Attachments: # (1) Part Three) (jmr) (Entered: 20-Apr-2010) [Minutes [794], [Static page].]
[Article]
[Text]
Court
[857] 19-Apr-2010 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of March 10, 2010-Jury Trial-Volume II before Judge Ted Stewart, re [567] Notice of Appeal,. Court Reporter/Transcriber Ed Young, Ray Fenlon, Patti Walker, Telephone number (801) 328-3202.
Notice Re Redaction of Transcripts: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 10-May-2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 20-May-2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 19-Jul-2010. (Attachments: # (1) Part Two, # (2) Part 3) (jmr) (Entered: 20-Apr-2010) [Minutes [795], [Static page].]
[Article]
[Text]
Court
[858] 19-Apr-2010 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of March 11, 2010-Jury Trial before Judge Ted Stewart, re [567] Notice of Appeal,. Court Reporter/Transcriber Patti Walker, CSR, RPR, CP, Telephone number (801)364-5440.
Notice Re Redaction of Transcripts: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 10-May-2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 20-May-2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 19-Jul-2010. (Attachments: # (1) Part Two, # (2) Part Three) (jmr) (Entered: 20-Apr-2010) [Minutes [796], [Static page].]
[Article]
[Text]
Court
[859] 19-Apr-2010 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of March 12, 2010-Jury Trial before Judge Ted Stewart re [567] Notice of Appeal,. Court Reporter/Transcriber Patti Walker, CSR, RPR, CP, Telephone number (801)364-5440.
Notice Re Redaction of Transcripts: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 10-May-2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 20-May-2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 19-Jul-2010. (Attachments: # (1) Part Two, # (2) Part Three) (jmr) Modified on 20-Apr-2010-added text (jmr). (Entered: 20-Apr-2010) [Minutes [797], [Static page].]
[Article]
[Text]
Court
[860] 19-Apr-2010 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of March 15, 2010-Jury Trial before Judge Ted Stewart, re [567] Notice of Appeal,. Court Reporter/Transcriber Patti Walker, CSR, RPR, CP, Telephone number (801)364-5440.
Notice Re Redaction of Transcripts: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 10-May-2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 20-May-2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 19-Jul-2010. (Attachments: # (1) Part Two, # (2) Part Three) (jmr) (Entered: 20-Apr-2010) [Minutes [800], [Static page].]
[Article]
[Text]
Court
[861] 19-Apr-2010 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of March 16, 2010-Jury Trial-Volume VII before Judge Ted Stewart, re [567] Notice of Appeal. Court Reporter/Transcriber Ed Young, Becky Janke, Patti Walker, Telephone number (801) 328-3202.
Notice Re Redaction of Transcripts: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 10-May-2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 20-May-2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 19-Jul-2010. (Attachments: # (1) Part Two, # (2) Part Three) (jmr) (Entered: 20-Apr-2010) [Minutes [808], [Static page].]
[Article]
[Text]
Court
[862] 19-Apr-2010 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of March 17, 2010-Jury Trial before Judge Ted Stewart, re [567] Notice of Appeal,. Court Reporter/Transcriber Laura W. Robinson Rebecca Janke Patti Walker, Telephone number (801)364-5440.
Notice Re Redaction of Transcripts: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 10-May-2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 20-May-2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 19-Jul-2010. (Attachments: # (1) Part Two, # (2) Part Three) (jmr) (Entered: 20-Apr-2010) [Minutes [809], [Static page].]
[Article]
[Text]
Court
[863] 19-Apr-2010 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript re March 18, 2010-Jury Trial-Volume IX before Judge Stewart re: 567 Notice of Appeal,. Court Reporter/Transcriber Ed Young, Laura Robinson, Patti Walker, Telephone number (801) 328-3202.
Notice Re Redaction of Transcripts: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 10-May-2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 20-May-2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 19-Jul-2010. (Attachments: # (1) Part Two, # (2) Part Three) (jmr) Modified on 20-Apr-2010 (jmr). (Entered: 20-Apr-2010) [Minutes [813], [Static page].]
[Article]
[Text]
[Article]
Court
[864] 19-Apr-2010 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of March 19, 2010-Jury Trial before Judge Ted Stewart, re [567] Notice of Appeal,. Court Reporter/Transcriber Patti Walker, CSR, RPR, CP, Telephone number 801-364-5440.
Notice Re Redaction of Transcripts: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 10-May-2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 20-May-2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 19-Jul-2010. (Attachments: # (1) Part Three [Part Two], # (2) Part Three) (jmr) (Entered: 20-Apr-2010) [Minutes [814], [Static page].]
[Article]
[Text]
Court
[865] 19-Apr-2010 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of March 22, 2010-Jury Trial before Judge Ted Stewart, re [567] Notice of Appeal,. Court Reporter/Transcriber Patti Walker, CSR, RPR, CP, Telephone number (801)364-5440.
Notice Re Redaction of Transcripts: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 10-May-2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 20-May-2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 19-Jul-2010. (Attachments: # (1) Part Two, # (2) Part Three) (jmr) (Entered: 20-Apr-2010) [Minutes [822], [Static page].]
[Article]
[Text]
Court
[866] 19-Apr-2010 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of March 23, 2010-Jury Trial before Judge Ted Stewart, re [567] Notice of Appeal,. Court Reporter/Transcriber Patti Walker, CSR, RPR, CP, Telephone number (801)364-5440.
Notice Re Redaction of Transcripts: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 10-May-2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 20-May-2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 19-Jul-2010. (Attachments: # (1) Part Two, # (2) Part Three) (jmr) (Entered: 20-Apr-2010) [Minutes [837], [Static page].]
[Article] Court
[867] 19-Apr-2010 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of March 24, 2010-Jury Trial before Judge Ted Stewart, re [567] Notice of Appeal,. Court Reporter/Transcriber Patti Walker, CSR, RPR, CP, Telephone number (801)364-5440.
Notice Re Redaction of Transcripts: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 10-May-2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 20-May-2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 19-Jul-2010. (Attachments: # (1) Part Two, # (2) Part Three) (jmr) (Entered: 20-Apr-2010) [Minutes [840], [Static page].]
[Article] Court
[868] 19-Apr-2010 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of March 25, 2010-Jury Trial before Judge Ted Stewart, re [567] Notice of Appeal,. Court Reporter/Transcriber Patti Walker, CSR, RPR, CP, Telephone number (801)364-5440.
Notice Re Redaction of Transcripts: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 10-May-2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 20-May-2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 19-Jul-2010. (Attachments: # (1) Part Two, # (2) Part Three) (jmr) (Entered: 20-Apr-2010) [Minutes [841], [Static page].] [Referenced by [886].]
[Article] Court
[869] 19-Apr-2010 [Restricted Document] Notice of Filing of Official Transcript for dates of March 26, 2010-Jury Trial before Judge Ted Stewart, re [567] Notice of Appeal. Court Reporter/Transcriber Patti Walker, CSR, RPR, CP, Telephone number 801-364-5440.
Notice Re Redaction of Transcripts: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 10-May-2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 20-May-2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 19-Jul-2010. (Attachments: # (1) Part Two) (jmr) (Entered: 20-Apr-2010) [Minutes [842], [Static page].]
[Article] Court

[871] 27-Apr-2010 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. [Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, in the Alternative, for a new Trial] (Hatch, Brent)
[Referenced by [872] [873] [874] [875] [877].]
[Article] SCO
[872] 27-Apr-2010 Memorandum in Support re [871] Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Text] SCO
[873] 11-May-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [871] Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or a New Trial filed by Counter Claimant Novell, Inc., Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Text] Novell
[874] 27-Apr-2010 Motion for New Trial filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. See document [871] for image. (asp) (Entered: 12-May-2010) [Referenced by [875] [877].] SCO
[875] 28-May-2010 Reply to Response to Motion re [874] [same as [871].] Motion for New Trial filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Hatch, Brent) [Text] SCO
[876] 10-Jun-2010 Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law that Novells claim for declaratory judgment is Granted ; that SCOs claims for specific performance and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing are Denied. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 10-Jun-2010. (asp) [Referenced by [881].] [Text] Court
[877] 10-Jun-2010 Memorandum Decision denying [871] Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying [874] Motion for New Trial. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 10-Jun-2010. (asp) [Referenced by [881].] [Text] Court
[878] 10-Jun-2010 Judgment in favor of Novell, Inc. against SCO Group. Case Closed. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 10-Jun-2010. (asp) [Referenced by [881].] [Text] Court
[879] 24-Jun-2010 Bill of Costs filed by Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [See first Bill of Costs [573] and Taxation of Costs [595].]
[Referenced by [880] [883] [890] [891] [894].]
[Article] Novell
[880] 24-Jun-2010 Response [it's actually the Memorandum in Support] re [879] Bill of Costs,, Memorandum filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit F) (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[881] 07-Jul-2010 Notice of Appeal as to [876] Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law, [878] Judgment, [877] Order on Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, Order on Motion for New Trial, Memorandum Decision filed by SCO Group. Appeals to the USCA for the 10th Circuit. Filing fee $ 455, receipt number 1088-1150192. (Hatch, Brent)
[Referenced by [882] [884] [885] [886] [887][896].]
[Article] SCO
[882] 08-Jul-2010 Transmission of Preliminary Record to USCA re [881] Notice of Appeal with partial docket attached. (jmr) [Article]
[883] 08-Jul-2010 Motion to Stay Taxation of Costs [879] filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix Unpublished Cases)(Hatch, Brent) [Referenced by [888] [889].] [Text] SCO
[884] 09-Jul-2010 USCA Case Number Case Appealed to Tenth Case Number 10-4122 for [881] Notice of Appeal, filed by SCO Group. (jmr)
[885] 15-Jul-2010 [Restricted Document] NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT for dates of February 25, 2010-Motion Hearing before Judge Ted Stewart, re [881] Notice of Appeal. Court Reporter/Transcriber Patti Walker, CSR, RPR, CP, Telephone number 801-364-5440.
NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 05-Aug-2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 16-Aug-2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 13-Oct-2010. (jmr) [Minutes [732], [733]. Duplicate of [756].]
Court
[886] 15-Jul-2010 [Restricted Document] NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT for dates of March 25, 2010-Jury Instruction Conference before Judge Ted Stewart, re [881] Notice of Appeal,. Court Reporter/Transcriber Patti Walker, CSR, RPR, CP, Telephone number 801-364-5440.
NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: Within 7 business days of this filing, each party shall inform the Court, by filing a Notice of Intent to Redact, of the parties intent to redact personal data identifiers from the electronic transcript of the court proceeding. The policy and forms are located on the court's website at www.utd.uscourts.gov. Please read this policy carefully. If no Notice of Intent to Redact is filed within the allotted time, this transcript will be made electronically available on the date set forth below.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 05-Aug-2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 16-Aug-2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 13-Oct-2010. (jmr) [Minutes [841], See [868].]
[Text] Court
[--] 20-Jul-2010 Deadlines terminated. Transcript deadlines terminated for docket entry [855]. Original transcript will remain restricted. A corrected version was added and has been released. (rks) [Article] Court
[887] 21-Jul-2010 Please be advised the Record is complete for purposes of appeal for USCA case number 10-4122 re [881] Notice of Appeal. (jmr) Court
[888] 26-Jul-2010 Memorandum in Opposition re [883] Motion to Stay Taxation of Costs filed by Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[889] 17-Aug-2010 Order denying [883] Motion to Stay. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 16-Aug-2010. (asp) [Article] Court
[890] 26-Aug-2010 Objections to [879] Bill of Costs filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A) (Normand, Edward) [Referenced by [891].] [Article] SCO
[891] 07-Sep-2010 Response re [890] Objections, to [879] Bill of Costs filed by Counter Claimant Novell, Inc., Defendant Novell, Inc.. (Brennan, Sterling) [Article] Novell
[892] 20-Sep-2010 Notice of Filing of Order from United States Bankruptcy Court District of Delaware. (las) (Entered: 21-Sep-2010) BK Court
[893] 15-Oct-2010 Supreme Court Order dated 26-Aug-2010 dismissing certiorari (text entry from Supreme Court docket) as to [567] Notice of Appeal, filed by SCO Group. (jmr) SCO
[894] 06-Dec-2010 Costs Taxed in amount of $ 187,817.95 for Defendant against Plaintiff signed by Louise York, Chief Deputy Clerk 06-Dec-2010. (las) (Entered: 07-Dec-2010) [See [879] Bill of Costs.] [Text] Court
[895] 30-Aug-2010 RECEIPT filed by Plaintiff SCO Group. Withdrawal of all trial exhibits. (slm) (Entered: 03/11/2011)   SCO
[896] 22-Sept-2011 MANDATE of USCA as to [881] Notice of Appeal, filed by SCO Group According to the USCA the Mandate of the USDC for the Dist of UT is AFFIRMED. (Attachments: # 1 Mandate Cover Letter)(las) (Entered: 09/22/2011)   Court

Court-Ordered Deadlines, Past and Pending (jump to Post Appeal):

25-Jan-2006 [88] Telephone Conference set for 25-Jan-2006 02:30 PM in Room 220 before Judge Dale A. Kimball. [cancelled on stipulation]
07-Mar-2006 [85] Amended Pleadings due.
07-Mar-2006 [85] Joinder of Parties due.
26-Jan-2007
14-Mar-2007
13-Apr-2007

20-Apr-2007



[263]
Dispositive Motions due.
[date set by [85] changed by [162].]
[date changed by [244]]
[date changed by [263]]
01-Nov-2006
01-Feb-2007
02-Mar-2007

30-Apr-2007



[257]
Discovery due.
[date set by [85] changed by [162].]
[date changed by [229]]
[date changed by [257]]
25-Apr-2007
14-May-2007

[269]
Experts reports due.
[date set by [244] changed by [269].]
23-May-2007
11-Jun-2007

[269]
Opposing expert reports.
[date set by [244] changed by [269].]
08-Jun-2007
26-Jun-2007

[269]
Rebuttal expert reports.
[date set by [244] changed by [269].]
22-Jun-2007
10-Jul-2007

[269]
Expert depositions [June 14-22] [July 2-10].
[date set by [244] changed by [269].]
02-Aug-2007 [368] Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures
17-Aug-2007 [378] Joint Statement
16-Aug-2007 20-Aug-2007
[378]
Proposed Jury Instructions
[date set by [368] changed by [378].]
21-Aug-2007 [368] Special Attorney Conference and Settlement Conference
[According to [378] the Conference must be held before the 07-Sep-2007 Final Pretrial Order.]
22-Aug-2007
24-Aug-2007

[378]
Motions in Limine
[date set by [368] changed by [378].]
29-Aug-2007 [378] Stipulated Jury Instructions and Supplemental Instructions
29-Aug-2007
31-Aug-2007

[378]
Oppositions to Motions in Limine
[date set by [368] changed by [378].]
31-Aug-2007 [376] Objections to the Pre-Trial Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures
04-Sep-2007 [378] Reply Memoranda to Oppositions to Motions in Limine
05-Sep-2007 [378] Objections to Supplemental Jury Instructions
09-Aug-2007
07-Sep-2007

[378]
Final Pretrial Order
[date set by [368] changed by [378].]
10-Sep-2007 [378] Proposed Voir Dire
[date set by [378] jury trial denied by [453].]
10-Sep-2007 [378] Proposed Special Verdict Form
[date set by [378] jury trial denied by [453].]
10-Sep-2007 [453] Novell's Opposition to Motion [419] for Reconsideration or Clarification of the Court's August 10, 2007 Order.
11-Sep-2007 [368] Daubert Hearing
06-Jun-2007
11-Sep-2007

[368]
Final Pretrial Conference. [Date set by [85]]
[date changed by [368]]
12-Sep-2007 [378] Replies to Objections to Supplemental Jury Instructions
[date set by [378] jury trial denied by [453].]
12-Sep-2007 [453] SCO's Reply in Further Support of Motion [419] for Reconsideration or Clarification of the Court's August 10, 2007 Order.
13-Sep-2007 [378] Objections to Proposed Special Verdict Form
[date set by [378] jury trial denied by [453].]
14-Sep-2007 [453] Trial Briefs
13-Dec-2007 [473] Joint statement regarding the appropriate procedures for resolving the issues. [date set by [473].]
23-Apr-2008 [485] Trial Briefs [Only Novell sent its Trial Brief on the original 14-Sep-2007 date.]
17-Sep-2007
29-Apr-2008

[485]
Proposed Finding of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Proposed Form of Judgment.
[date set by [453] stayed by [471] Notice of Filing For Bankruptcy. Date changed by [485].]
17-Sep-2007
29-Apr-2008

[484]
Jury Trial. [date set by [162] jury trial denied by [453]. Courtroom changed by [460].]
[date stayed by [471] Notice of Filing For Bankruptcy. Date changed by [484].]

Post Appeal Court-Ordered Deadlines, Past and Pending:

01-Feb-2010 [613] Supplemental Rule 26(a)(3) Pretrial Disclosures. [date set by [613].]
04-Feb-2010 [611] Hearing on Novell's pending summary judgment motion on special damages and Novell's Rule 60 motion. [date set by [611] and [613]. Stricken by [621].]
08-Feb-2010 [613] Motions in Limine including any Daubert Motions. [date set by [613].]
08-Feb-2010 [613] Special Attorney Conference and Settlement Conference. [date set by [613].]
19-Feb-2010 [613] Oppositions to Motions in Limine including any Daubert Motions. [date set by [613].]
22-Feb-2010 [613] Parties to submit Joint Pretrial Order. Parties to serve proposed jury instructions and any proposed special verdict forms. Parties to submit any proposed additional voir dire to the Court. [date set by [613].]
25-Feb-2010 [605] Final Pretrial Conference. [date set by [605] and [613].]
01-Mar-2010 [613] Parties to submit trial briefs, joint proposed jury instructions, and joint proposed special verdict forms (with separate proposed instructions or special verdict forms if agreement not reached). [date set by [613].]
05-Mar-2010 [613] Parties to submit objections to proposed jury instructions and special verdict forms. [date set by [613].]
08-Mar-2010 [613] First Day of Trial. Parties may submit replies in support of proposed jury instructions and special verdict forms. [date set by [613].]
08-Mar-2010 [605] 3-week Jury Trial (08-Mar-2010, 26-Mar-2010). [date set by [605] and [613].]

Substantive court orders:
09-June-2004 [29] [PDF] Memorandum Decision denying [11-1] motion to remand, granting in part, denying in part [2-1] motion to dismiss: Dft's Motion to Dismiss is denied as to pla's pleading of falsity and granted as to pla's pleading of special damages. Pla is granted 30 days from the date of this order to amend signed by Dale A. Kimball cc:atty (blk) [Article]
[Text]
Court
27-June-2005 [75] [PDF] Order denying [35] Motion to Dismiss . Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 27-Jun-2005. [Text] Court
17-Jul-2006 [136] Order on Motion for More Definite Statement
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Dale A. Kimball : Motion Hearing held on 17-Jul-2006 re [104] Motion to Stay filed by Novell, Inc., and [109] Motion for More Definite Statement filed by Novell, Inc.. Mr. Jacobs advised Court that [109] Motion for More Definite Statement is moot as Plaintiff will be amending complaint, and that arbitration will begin shortly as arbitrators are being chosen at this time. The Court heard the arguments of counsel as to the Motion to Stay and took the motion under advisement. Written Order to follow oral order: no. Attorney for Plaintiff: Stuart Singer, William Dzurilla and Brent Hatch, Attorney for Defendant: Michael Jacobs and Thomas Karrenburg. (Court Reporter: Becky Janke.) [Groklaw's Reports from the Hearing. Transcript as [PDF] and [Text]. Transcript [579] [586].]
[Article] Court
21-Aug-2006 [139] [PDF] Order Granting In Part [104] Novell's Motion to Stay Claims Raising Issues Subject to Arbitration [Text] Court
24-Oct-2006 [162] [PDF] Order granting in part and denying in part SCO's Motion [156] for Expedited Stay or Continuance [Text] Court
22-Mar-2007 [252] [PDF] Order on [250] Motion to Amend/Correct Second Amended Complaint. It is hereby ordered that Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant SCO's Second Amended Complaint is deemed amended to reflect that SCO's Fifth Claim for Relief arises out of Utah statutory and/or common law and Defendant and Counterclaim-Plaintiff Novell's Motion [109] for a More Definite Statement of SCO's Unfair Competition Cause of Action is mooted. [Article] Court
20-Apr-2007 [270] [PDF] Order granting [268] Motion for Protective Order - Second Stipulated Addendum to Protective Order. [Article] Court
10-Aug-2007 [377] [PDF] Memorandum Decision and Order on Partial Summary Judgments.
[147] Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment or Preliminary Injunction is Granted in Part and Denied in Part;
[180] SCO's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Third, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth and Ninth Counterclaims is Granted in Part and Denied in Part;
[171] Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its Fourth Claim is Granted;
[224] SCO's Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Novell's Fourth Claim is Denied;
[258] SCO's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on its First, Second, and Fifth Claims and Novell's First Claim is Denied;
[271] Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Copyright Ownership of SCO's Second Claim for Breach of Contract and Fifth Claim for Unfair Competition is Granted;
[273] Novell's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SCO's Non-Compete Claims in its Second and Fifth Claims is Granted in Part and Denied in Part;
[275] Novell's Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title and Third Claim for Specific Performance is Granted;
[277] and Novell's Motion for Summary Judgment on SCO's First Claim for Slander of Title for Failure to Establish Special Damages is Moot.
[Article]
[Text]
Court
07-Sep-2007 [453] [PDF] Order on Motions in Limine
[410] SCO's Motion for Entry of Final Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) is Denied;
[385] Novell's Motion to Strike Jury Demand is Granted;
[387] Novell's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Its Third Claim for Relief is Granted;
[389] SCO's Motion in Limine to Exclude All Evidence Related to Other Litigation and Commentary Thereon is Moot;
[391] Novell's Motion in Limine No. 1 to Preclude SCO from Challenging Questions Already Decided as a Matter of Law is Granted;
[393] Novell's Motion in Limine No. 2 to Preclude SCO from Contesting Licenses Conveying SVRX Rights are "SVRX Licenses" is Granted;
[408] SCO's Amended Motion in Limine Regarding Apportionment of Microsoft and Sun SCOsource Licenses is Moot in Part and Denied in Part;
[395] Novell's Motion in Limine No. 3 to Preclude SCO from Introducing New Evidence or Argument Regarding Apportionment of SCOsource Revenue is Denied.
[Text] Court
11-Sep-2007 [457] [PDF] Order denying [390] Motion to Strike Exhibits; denying [405] Motion to Exclude Testimony. [Article] Court
14-Sep-2007 [469] [PDF] Order denying SCO's Motion [419] for Reconsideration or Clarification of the Court's Order dated August 10, 2007 [Text] Court
15-Jul-2008 [541] [PDF] Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. Order denying [540] Motion to Intervene and Reconsideration or Clarification. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 15-Jul-2008. (Entered: 16-Jul-2008) [Text] Court
16-Jul-2008 [542] [PDF] Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 16-Jul-2008. [Text] Court
20-Nov-2008 [565] [PDF] Final Judgment in favor of Novell, Inc., SCO Group and also against Novell, Inc., SCO Group. Case Closed. Magistrate Judge Brooke C. Wells no longer assigned to case. See Judgment for details. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 20-Nov-2008. [Text] Court
13-Mar-2009 [591] [PDF] Order denying [575] Motion to Stay Taxation of Costs. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 13-Mar-2009. [Text] Court
24-Aug-2009 [596] [PDF] Order of Recusal Judge Dale A. Kimball recused. Case reassigned to Judge Ted Stewart for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Dale A. Kimball on 24-Aug-2009. [Article]
[Article]
Court
28-Jan-2010 [620] [PDF] Memorandum Decision denying [608] Motion to Set Aside Judgment. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 28-Jan-2010. (asp) [Text] Court
28-Jan-2010 [621] [PDF] Memorandum Decision granting in part and denying in part [277] Motion for Summary Judgment ; The hearing set for February 4, 2010, is Stricken. Signed by Judge Ted Stewart on 28-Jan-2010. (asp) [Text] Court

Miscellaneous Groklaw stories
This section lists Groklaw's articles that are not tied to particular docket entries but should appear in the list of all Groklaw's Articles on SCO v. Novell.
26-Nov-2010 The Elliott Associates $$ Agreements Behind the Novell-Attachmate Merger
24-Nov-2010 The Novell-Attachmate Merger Agreement & A Message from Novell: We're Keeping the Copyrights Post-Merger
22-Nov-2010 Novell Agrees to be Acquired by AttachMate; Sells Some IP to a MS-Organized Consortium
13-Nov-2010 1995 SCO, HP, Novell press release: SCO bought the UnixWare business
23-Jul-2010 SCO v. Novell Trial Transcripts - with line numbers - complete
19-Apr-2010 What the Judge Still Has to Decide in SCO v. Novell - Updated
07-Apr-2010 Darl Buys (Not Licenses) SCO's Mobility Assets for $100,000
05-Apr-2010 Now What?
20-Mar-2010 Novell Says Elliott Offer "Inadequate" - It's "business as usual"
20-Mar-2010 APA's "Included Assets" Did Not List SVR4.2 - Research Project - Updated 4Xs
10-Mar-2010 Volunteer Needed for Thursday Trial Coverage
07-Mar-2010 Novell Never Mentioned UnixWare in its press releases in 2003
07-Mar-2010 We Need A Volunteer for Monday at the Trial
23-Feb-2010 SCO & Novell's Motions in Limine and Daubert Motions - A Chart. (Also available as a Static Page.)
19-Feb-2010 Judge Stewart's New Book, "Seven Miracles That Saved America"
11-Jan-2010 Sup. Ct.'s Justice Sotomayor Grants Novell's Request to Extend Time to File Petition for Writ of Certiorari
30-Mar-2009 The SCO v. Novell Summary Judgment Motions: Chart
23-Mar-2009 Maciaszek Trial Testimony in SCO/Novell Contradicted - Updated: Wilson Confirmed
27-Aug-2008 For the Sake of History, a Novell 1994 10K: Unix source and UnixWare 2 separate products
30-Jul-2008 SCO Tells Customers and Partners It Will Appeal Shortly
29-Nov-2006 Kimball Rules: SCO's Objections Denied! Wells's Order Affirmed - Novell Goes 1st.
14-Jul-2006 Novell Copyrights on SCO's UnixWare 2.1
20-Mar-2006 Order from 20-Dec-2005 Hearing - No 100% Transfers of Business in Novell to SC or SC to Caldera
20-Oct-2004 Novell-Santa Cruz Bill of Sale December 6, 1995 - PDF and text
14-Oct-2004 A Little More On Mr. Chatlos
25-Mar-2004 EV1 Regrets, Novell Filing, and Kapor on SCO
19-Mar-2004 If You Were Wondering When Wall St. Would Get It . . .and Novell, Not a Bit Scared
17-Mar-2004 Novell's Chris Stone: "We Still Own UNIX and We Believe that UNIX Is not In Linux"
12-Feb-2004 Novell Notifies SCO
11-Feb-2004 What *Is* Slander of Title, Anyway?
26-Jan-2004 Novell Shows Its Hand in the SCO Correspondence
22-Jan-2004 Why SCO Wants All Versions of AIX and Some Novell News
14-Jan-2004 SCO Goes Global but Novell May Block The Way
13-Jan-2004 SCO Reacts to Novell's Indemnification
13-Jan-2004 Novell Releases Their Correspondence with SCO
23-Dec-2003 Early Reaction to Novell's Copyright Claims and Linus' Statement
22-Dec-2003 Novell's Letters - Why They Contest SCO's Copyright
22-Dec-2003 Novell Registers UNIX System V Copyrights - Dueling Copyrights
07-Dec-2003 The 1995 Novell-SCO Asset Purchase Agreement's Schedules
18-Nov-2003 Advance Peek at Teleconference and SCO May Sue Novell
11-Nov-2003 The Novell Letters (Transcripts of IBM Doc-41-K.pdf and Doc-41-L.pdf)
04-Nov-2003 Details from Novell's Chris Stone and Novell-IBM Linux Seminars
04-Nov-2003 Novell Buys SuSe Linux -- Press Conference 11:00 AM EST
03-Nov-2003 The Novell-SCO 1995 Asset Purchase Agreement
08-Aug-2003 The Novell Letters
07-Aug-2003 Update: Novell was 3rd Party to SCO-IBM AIX Contract
28-May-2003 Novell Scores a Touchdown - SCO Statement


For bankruptcy court filings, see Bankruptcy Timeline page.

© Copyright 2004-2011 Pamela Jones

This page is maintained by PJ and Erwan.


Last Updated Sunday, December 09 2012 @ 06:32 AM EST


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )