decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster

SCO v. Novell Appeal Timeline

SCO v. Novell - The Appeals

This page offers you the documents filed in all of the appeals in the SCO v. Novell litigation. SCO filed two separate appeals with the US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, the second one still pending. Here is the order [PDF] [Text] on SCO's first appeal. And Novell has filed a petition for certiorari with the US Supreme Court, which has not yet indicated whether it will hear this case or not.

SCO's Second Appeal, 2010 ]   [ Novell's Appeal to SCOTUS, 2010 ]   [ SCO's First Appeal, 2008-09 ]   [ Misc. Groklaw articles ]

Related pages: [ Utah District Court Filings ]   [ Overview ]   [ Other SCO litigation ]

[Note: Pending motions are in red text. For those who are color blind, look for the word pending.]



SCO Group v. Novell, Inc. - Second Appeal - Docketed: 09-Jul-2010

U. S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals - Denver
History for Case #10-4122

Assigned to: Judges Terence O'Brien, Stephanie K. Seymour and Jerome A. Holmes

DOCKET # DATE ACTION ACTOR
[9777924] 09-Jul-2010 Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. DATE RECEIVED: 08-Jul-2010. Docketing statement due 23-Jul-2010 for SCO Group. Transcript order form due 23-Jul-2010 for Brent O. Hatch. Notice of appearance due on 23-Jul-2010 for Novell, Inc. and SCO Group. [Article] SCO
[9781102] 21-Jul-2010 Notice of appearance submitted by Edward Normand for Appellant SCO Group for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 21-Jul-2010. Manner of Service: email.--[Edited 21-Jul-2010 by LAB to remove PDF from entry as pleading has been filed as of 21-Jul-2010] [Article] SCO
[9781107] 21-Jul-2010 Notice of appearance submitted by Stuart H. Singer for Appellant SCO Group for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 21-Jul-2010. Manner of Service: email. [Article] SCO
[9781111] 21-Jul-2010 Notice of appearance submitted by Brent O. Hatch and Mark F. James for Appellant SCO Group for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. - interested parties already listed.--[Edited 21-Jul-2010 by BV - To add the text - interested parties already liested] Served on 21-Jul-2010. Manner of Service: email.--[Edited 21-Jul-2010 by BV - To remove the PDF from the docket entry as pleading has been filed as of 21-Jul-2010.] [Article] SCO
[9781115] 21-Jul-2010 Notice filed that the transcript is already on file in the district court filed by Mr. Edward Normand, Esq. for SCO Group. Served on: 21-Jul-2010. Manner of Service: email. [Article] SCO
[9781125] 21-Jul-2010 Docketing statement filed by SCO Group. Served on 21-Jul-2010. Manner of Service: email. [Article] SCO
[9781138] 21-Jul-2010 Minute order filed - Notice due that record is complete by 16-Aug-2010 for D. Mark Jones, Clerk of Court. (Text Only - No Attachment). [Article] Court
[9781146] 21-Jul-2010 Notice of appearance filed by Mr. Edward Normand, Esq. for SCO Group. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 21-Jul-2010. Manner of Service: email. [Article] SCO
[9781155] 21-Jul-2010 Filed notice record is complete. Served on 21-Jul-2010. Appellant's brief and appendix due on 30-Aug-2010 for SCO Group. [Article]
[9781158] 21-Jul-2010 Notice of appearance filed by Mr. Stuart H. Singer for SCO Group. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 21-Jul-2010. Manner of Service: email. [Article] SCO
[9781234] 21-Jul-2010 Notice of appearance filed by Mr. Brent O. Hatch and Mr. Mark F. James for SCO Group. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. - interested parties already listed as attorney and non parties. Served on 21-Jul-2010. Manner of Service: ECF/NDA [Article] SCO
[9782105] 23-Jul-2010 Notice of appearance submitted by Sterling A. Brennan, David R. Wright, L. Rex Sears, Cara J. Baldwin for Appellee Novell, Inc. for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 23-Jul-2010. Manner of Service: ECF/NDA, US mail. [Article] Novell
[9782108] 23-Jul-2010 Notice of appearance submitted by Michael A. Jacobs, Deanne E. Maynard, Brian R. Matsui, Daniel P. Muino, Nathan B. Sabri for Appellee Novell, Inc. for court review. Certificate of Interested Parties: Yes. Served on 23-Jul-2010. Manner of Service: ECF/NDA, US mail. [Article] Novell
[9782139] 26-Jul-2010 Notice of appearance filed by Mr. Nathan B. Sabri, Mr. Daniel P. Muino, Brian R. Matsui, Ms. Deanne Maynard, and Mr. Michael Allen Jacobs for Novell, Inc. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 23-Jul-2010. Manner of Service: US mail. Novell
[9782154] 26-Jul-2010 Notice of appearance filed by Ms. Cara J. Baldwin, Mr. Sterling A. Brennan, Mr. Lannie Rex Sears, and Mr. David R. Wright for Novell, Inc.. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y (parties have already been disclosed/added to case). Served on 26-Jul-2010. Manner of Service: ECF/NDA. Novell
[9784367] 30-Jul-2010 Notice of an NDA re-sent to Brian Matsui.
[9792495] 27-Aug-2010 Motion filed by Appellant SCO Group to extend time to file appellant/petitioner's brief until 09-Sep-2010. Served on: 27-Aug-2010. Manner of service: ECF/NDA. [Text] SCO
[9792523] 27-Aug-2010 Order filed by Clerk of the Court granting Attorney motion to extend time to file apet brief. Appellant's brief and appendix due on 09-Sep-2010 for SCO Group. Served on 27-Aug-2010. [Article] Court
[9796063] 09-Sep-2010 Appellant/Petitioner's brief filed by SCO Group. Original and 7 copies. Served on 09-Sep-2010 by email, ECF/NDA. Oral argument requested? Yes. [Text] SCO
[9796687] 13-Sep-2010 Minute order filed - Appellee's brief now due 15-Oct-2010 for Novell, Inc. (Text Only - No Attachment) Court
[9802990] 01-Oct-2010 Motion filed by Appellee Novell, Inc. to extend time to file appellee/respondent's brief until 29-Oct-2010. Served on: 01-Oct-2010. Manner of service: ECF/NDA, email. [Article] Novell
[9803037] 01-Oct-2010 Order filed by Clerk of the Court granting appellee's unopposed motion for an extension of time to file appellee's brief to 29-Oct-2010 for Novell, Inc. Served on 01-Oct-2010. [Article] Court
[9811224] 29-Oct-2010 Appellee/Respondent's brief filed by Novell, Inc.. Original and 7 copies. Served on: 28-Oct-2010. Manner of service: email, ECF/NDA. Oral argument requested? Yes. [Text] Novell
[9811830] 02-Nov-2010 Minute order filed - Appellant's reply brief due 15-Nov-2010 by SCO Group. (Text Only - No Attachment) [Text] Court
[9812715] 04-Nov-2010 Motion filed by Appellant SCO Group to expedite case. Served on: 04-Nov-2010. Manner of service: email, ECF/NDA. [Alternate [PDF].] [Text] SCO
[9813156] 08-Nov-2010 Order filed by Clerk of the Court This matter is before the court on Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Expedite Appeal (the “Motion”). Upon consideration, the Motion is granted in part, as provided below. Appellant’s optional reply brief remains due November 15, 2010. No extensions of time to file this brief will be considered. This appeal will be placed on the January 2011 oral argument calendar. The decision on whether to expedite consideration of, and the decision in, this case is referred to the panel of judges that will decide the appeal on the merits. [9812715-2]. Served on 08-Nov-2010. [Article] Court
[9815249] 15-Nov-2010 Appellant/Petitioner's reply brief filed by SCO Group. Original and 7 copies. Served on 15-Nov-2010. Manner of Service: ECF/NDA, email. [Text]
[Article]
SCO
[9817739] 23-Nov-2010 Calendar notice sent to counsel. Arguments to be held on January 20, 2011 at 9:00 am MST in Courtroom IV, Byron White United States Courthouse, Denver, CO. Counsel is required to go to http://www.ca10.uscourts.gov under the argument calendar tab to obtain an important notice regarding calendared cases and required forms. The calendar acknowledgment form must be completed and filed with the clerk via Electronic Case Filing within 10 days of today's date. [Actual schedule Article.] [Article] Court
[9818783] 29-Nov-2010 Oral Argument Acknowledgment Form filed by SCO Group. Served on 29-Nov-2010. Manner of Service: ECF/NDA. [Article] SCO
[9820392] 02-Dec-2010 Oral Argument Acknowledgment Form filed by Novell, Inc.. Served on 02-Dec-2010. Manner of Service: ECF/NDA. [Article] Novell
[9833381] 20-Jan-2011 Case argued by Stuart Singer for the Appellant; Michael Jacobs for the Appellee; and submitted to Judges O'Brien, Seymour and Holmes. [Groklaw's Reports from the Hearing. Audio mp3, ogg, Article. ] [Article]
[Audio]
Court
[9836178] 28-Jan-2011 Motion to release the oral argument recording filed by Mark A. Wielga. Served on 28-Jan-2011. Manner of Service: ECF/NDA. Mark A. Wielga
[9836408] 31-Jan-2011 Order filed by Judges O'Brien, Seymour and Holmes granting motion to release oral argument recording. Served on 31-Jan-2011. Court
[9842200] 18-Feb-2011 Motion to release the oral argument recording filed by Movant Mr. H. Preston Ladds, III. Served on 18-Feb-2011. Manner of Service: ECF/NDA. Preston Ladds
[Order] 30-Aug-2011 Order affirming Judge Ted Stewart's ruling [PDF]. [Text] Court
[ back to top ]



US Supreme Court
Novell, Inc., Petitioner
v.
The SCO Group, Inc.


Supreme Court of the United States.

Case: 09-1061 (was 09A647 with Novell as applicant)

DOCKET # DATE ACTION ACTOR
[--] 07-Jan-2010 Application (09A647) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 18, 2010 to February 18, 2010, submitted to Justice Sotomayor. [Available as Exhibit G to SCO's #669 Opposition to Novell's #627 Motion in Limine No. 1.] [Article] Novell
[--] 08-Jan-2010 Application (09A647) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until February 18, 2010. [Article] Court
[--] 03-Feb-2010 Application (09A647) to extend further the time from February 18, 2010 to March 4, 2010, submitted to Justice Sotomayor. [Available as Exhibit G to SCO's #669 Opposition to Novell's #627 Motion in Limine No. 1. [Article].] [Article] Novell
[--] 04-Feb-2010 Application (09A647) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until March 4, 2010. [Article] Court
[PDF]
[Pending]
04-Mar-2010 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 7, 2010) [Article]
[Text]
Novell
[--] 26-Mar-2010 Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 7, 2010. Court
[--] 29-Apr-2010 Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including August 5, 2010. [Article] Court
[PDF] 05-Aug-2010 Brief of respondent The SCO Group, Inc. in opposition filed. [Text] SCO
[PDF] 11-Aug-2010 Motion to dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46 received. [Article]
[Article]
Novell
[--] 26-Aug-2010 Petition Dismissed - Rule 46. [Article] Court
[ back to top ]



SCO Group v. Novell - 1st Appeal, 2008-2009

U. S. Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals - Denver
History for Case #08-4217

Assigned to: Justices Judges Lucero, Baldock and McConnell

DOCKET # DATE ACTION ACTOR
[9615593] 01-Dec-2008 Civil case docketed. Preliminary record filed. Date Received: 26-Nov-2008. Docketing statement due 15-Dec-2008 for SCO Group. Transcript order form due 15-Dec-2008 for Brent O. Hatch. Notice of appearance due on 15-Dec-2008 for Novell, Inc. and SCO Group. [Article] Court
[9618511] 10-Dec-2008 Open Document. Acknowledgement of transcript order filed by SCO Group. (Other proceeding 30-Apr-2008) Transcript order form due 24-Dec-2008 for Laura Robinson. [Article] SCO
[9618513] 10-Dec-2008 Open Document. Acknowledgement of transcript order filed by SCO Group. (See attached sheet for transcripts requested from Becky Janke). Transcript order form due 24-Dec-2008 for Becky Janke. [Article] SCO
[9618517] 10-Dec-2008 Open Document. Notice of appearance filed by Devan V. Padmanabham for SCO Group. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 10-Dec-2008. Manner of Service: US mail. [Article] SCO
[9618519] 10-Dec-2008 Open Document. Notice of appearance filed by Mr. Stuart H. Singer for SCO Group. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 10-Dec-2008. Manner of Service: US mail. [Article] SCO
[9618520] 10-Dec-2008 Open Document. Notice of appearance filed by Mr. Edward Normand, Robert B. SIlver, and Mr. David Boies for SCO Group. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 10-Dec-2008. Manner of Service: US mail. [Article] SCO
[9618522] 11-Dec-2008 Open Document Notice of appearance filed by Mr. Mark F. James and Mr. Brent O. Hatch for SCO Group. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: n. Served on 10-Dec-2008. Manner of Service: US mail. [Article] SCO
[9618529] 11-Dec-2008 Notice of an NDA re-sent to Robert Silver and Devan Padmanabhan. [Article]
[9618714] 11-Dec-2008 Open Document. Notice of appearance filed by Ms. Heather M. Sneddon for Novell, Inc. and Mr. Thomas R. Karrenberg for Novell, Inc. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 11-Dec-2008. Manner of Service: US mail [Article] Novell
[9618718] 11-Dec-2008 Open Document. Notice of appearance filed by Mr. Michael A. Jacobs for Novell, Inc. and Mr. George C. Harris for Novell, Inc. CERT. OF INTERESTED PARTIES: y. Served on 11-Dec-2008. Manner of Service: US mail [Article] Novell
[9619413] 15-Dec-2008 Open Document. Docketing statement filed by SCO Group. Served on 15-Dec-2008. Manner of Service: email. [Article] SCO
[9620202] 17-Dec-2008 Open Document. Case referred for mediation conferencing. Please open the document link in this notice for additional information. [Article] Court
[9623554] 05-Jan-2009 Open Document. Transcript order form filed by Ms. Laura Robinson. Laura Robinson
[9623970] 06-Jan-2009 Open Document. Transcript order form filed by Ms. Becky Janke. Transcript due 06-Feb-2009 for Becky Janke. Becky Janke
[9624173] 07-Jan-2009 Open Document. Transcript order form filed by Ms. Laura Robinson. Note the transcripts are complete, but have not yet been filed, as satisfactory payment arrangements have not been made. Laura Robinson
[9624175] 07-Jan-2009 Open Document. Transcript order form filed by Ms. Kelly Hicken. Transcript due 10-Feb-2009 for Kelly Hicken. Kelly Hicken
[9628775] 23-Jan-2009 Appellant's motion filed by SCO Group to expedite case. Served on 23-Jan-2009. Manner of Service: email. [Text] SCO
[9629704] 27-Jan-2009 Open Document. Appellee's response to [9628775-2] appellant's motion to expedite case filed by Novell, Inc. Served on 27-Jan-2008. Manner of Service: US mail. [Text] Novell
[9629985] 28-Jan-2009 Open Document. Order filed by Judges Kelly and McConnell (dec) granting in part appellant's motion to expedite case. There is no need to expedite the filing of appellant's opening brief and reply brief. Appellant can file the briefs at any time. Appellee is discouraged from filing any motion for extension of time to file a response brief. If appellee files a motion to extend time, appellee will be limited to a single extension of time of no more than 15 days. After briefing is completed, appellant may file a motion asking that the case be given expedited consideration on the merits by the panel ultimately assigned to hear this appeal. Served on 28-Jan-2009. [Text] Court
[9631672] 03-Feb-2009 Open Document. Filed notice record is complete. Served on 03-Feb-2009. Manner of Service:. Appellant's brief and appendix are due on 16-Mar-2009 for SCO Group.
[9640009] 04-Mar-2009 Appellant's deficient brief filed by SCO Group. Type of deficiency: No prior/related appeals statement, no reasons for oral argument (Appendix is fine). Appellant's brief due on 16-Mar-2009 for SCO Group. [Article] Court
[9640038] 06-Mar-2009 Errata sheet filed by SCO Group. Original and Served on 06-Mar-2009. Manner of Service: US mail. [Article] SCO
[9640044] 06-Mar-2009 Appellant brief filed by SCO Group. Original and 7 copies. Served on 06-Mar-2009 by email. Oral argument requested. Appendix filed (partial). Original and 2 copies. Appendix pages: 16,917. Appellee's brief due 09-Apr-2009 for Novell, Inc. [Referenced by [9649459] [9654117].] [Article]
[Text]
SCO
[9640255] 09-Mar-2009 Calendar notice sent to counsel. Arguments to be held Wednesday, May 6, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom I, Byron White U.S. Courthouse, Denver, CO. Counsel is required to go to http://www.ca10.uscourts.gov under the argument calendar tab to obtain an important notice regarding calendared cases and required forms that must be completed and returned to the clerk's office within 10 days. [Article] Court
[9649319] 09-Apr-2009 Notice of appearance filed by Grant L. Kim for Novell, Inc. Cert. of Interested Parties: n. Served on 08-Apr-2009. Manner of Service: US mail [Article] Novell
[9649459] 09-Apr-2009 Appellee/Respondent's brief filed by Novell, Inc.. Original and 7 copies. Served on: 09-Apr-2009. Manner of service: email, ECF/NDA, hand delivery. Oral argument requested? Yes. [Note: see [9640044].] [Text] Novell
[9650005] 13-Apr-2009 Addendum to appellee's brief filed by Novell, Inc in four volumes and containing 16717 pages. Original and 7 copies. Hardcopy only. Date of service: 09-Apr-2009 Manner of service: US mail.--[Edited 13-Apr-2009 by AT. The addendum only contains four volumes.] [Article] Novell
[9650894] 15-Apr-2009 Notice of courtroom change for oral argument on 06-May-2009 from Courtroom I to Courtroom II. Counsel shall report 45 minutes prior to the session to check in with the clerk. Court
[9652158]
[Pending]
20-Apr-2009 Motion for leave to file an amicus brief filed by Movant Wayne R. Gray. Served on 20-Apr-2009. Manner of Service: email.
[Referenced by [9655340] [9655989] [9656977].]
[Article]
[Article]
Wayne Gray
[9652159] 20-Apr-2009 Amicus brief received from Wayne R. Gray but not filed (pending ruling on motion to become amicus). Served on 20-Apr-2009. Manner of Service: email. [Article] Wayne Gray
[9652345] 21-Apr-2009 Order filed by Clerk of the Court response to motion to become amicus. Response due on 05-May-2009 for SCO Group. Served on 21-Apr-2009. [Article] Court
[9654117] 23-Apr-2009 Appellant's reply brief filed by SCO Group. Original and 7 copies. Served on 23-Apr-2009. Manner of Service: email. [Article], [Note: see [9640044].] [Text] SCO
[9655340] 30-Apr-2009 Response filed by Novell, Inc. to Wayne R. Gray's Motion [9652158] for Leave to File Amicus Brief. Served on 30-Apr-2009. Manner of Service: clerk. [Text] Novell
[9655989] 04-May-2009 Response to Motion [9652158] for leave to become amicus filed by SCO Group. Served on 04-May-2009. Manner of Service: email. [Article] SCO
[9656043] 04-May-2009 Errata sheet filed by SCO Group. Original and 7 copies. Served on 04-May-2009. Manner of Service: email. [Article] SCO
[9656815] 06-May-2009 Case argued by Stuart Singer for appellant and Michael Jacobs for appellee and submitted to Judges Lucero, Baldock and McConnell.
[Groklaw's Reports from the Hearing.]
[Article] Court
[9656977] 06-May-2009 Response filed by Wayne R. Gray to Appellee Novell, Inc.'s Opposition to Wayne R. Gray's Motion [9652158] for Leave to File Amicus Brief and Appellant's Response to Wayne R. Gray's Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief in Support of Defendant/Appellee Novell, Inc.. Served on 06-May-2009. Manner of Service: email, clerk. Wayne Gray
18-May-2009 This entry has been removed from the docket. See document filed entry [9660271] of 18-May-2009 [Article]
[9660271] 18-May-2009 Motion filed by Movant Wayne R. Gray for entry of order either releasing audio recording of oral argument or releasing a certified transcript of oral argument. Served on 18-May-2009. Manner of Service: US mail. filed by Wayne R. Gray. Original and. Served on 18-May-2009. Manner of Service: US mail. [Referenced by [9660359].] [Article] Wayne Gray
[9660359] 19-May-2009 Order filed by Judges Lucero, Baldock and McConnell Denying Movant Wayne R. Gray's request [9660271] for an order requiring release of the court's oral argument recording for this matter, or in the alternative Mr. Gray seeks release of a certified copy of the transcript. See 10th Cir. R. 34.1(E). Served on 19-May-2009. [Article] Court
[9686988] 24-Aug-2009 Affirmed in part, Reverse; Remanded. Terminated on the merits after oral hearing. Written, signed, published. Judges Lucero, Baldock and McConnell (authoring). Mandate to issue. [Text] Court
[9686992] 24-Aug-2009 Judgment for opinion filed. Court
[9690867] 08-Sep-2009 Petition for rehearing en banc filed by Novell, Inc.. Original and 18 copies. Served on 08-Sep-2009. Manner of Service: email. This entry has been removed from the docket - pleading cited as deficient 09-Sep-2009. Counsel contacted.--[Edited 09-Sep-2009 by BV] [Text] Novell
[9690896] 09-Sep-2009 Notice of clerical error: The rehearing petition filed today (September 8, 2009) by the appellee in SCO Group v. Novell, No. 08-4217, is a scanned, textless PDF and will be removed from the docket. Counsel will be notified. Court
[9690899] 09-Sep-2009 Deficient petition for rehearing filed by Novell, Inc. Served on 08-Sep-2009. Manner of Service: email. Type of deficiency: The rehearing petition filed by the appellee is a scanned, textless PDF Corrected petition for rehearing due 18-Sep-2009 for Novell, Inc.
[9690991] 09-Sep-2009 Petition for rehearing en banc filed by Novell, Inc.. Original and 18 copies. Served on 08-Sep-2009. Manner of Service: email. Novell
[9693254] 17-Sep-2009 Order filed by Clerk of the Court response to petition for rehearing en banc due. Response due on 01-Oct-2009 for SCO Group. Served on 17-Sep-2009. [Article] Court
[9698273] 01-Oct-2009 Response filed by SCO Group to Appellee Novell, Inc.'s Petition for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc. Served on 01-Oct-2009. Manner of Service: email, clerk. [Text] SCO
[9703322] 20-Oct-2009 Order filed by Judges Lucero, Baldock and McConnell denying petition for rehearing en banc filed by Appellee Novell, Inc. [Article] Court
[9705604] 27-Oct-2009 Motion filed by Appellee Novell, Inc. for stay of the Mandate Pending the Filing of a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States. Served on: 27-Oct-2009. Manner of service: clerk. [Referenced by [9705975].] [Text] Novell
[9705975] 28-Oct-2009 Order filed by Judges Lucero and Baldock denying Attorney motion [9705604] for stay filed by Appellee Novell, Inc.. Served on 28-Oct-2009. [Article] Court
[9706085] 29-Oct-2009 Mandate issued. [Text] Court
[ back to top ]

Miscellaneous Groklaw stories
This section lists Groklaw's articles that are not tied to particular docket entries but should appear in the list of all Groklaw's Articles on the SCO Novell Appeal.
19-Nov-2010 A Significant Novell Press Release Post-Amendment 2 Says Novell Sold "UnixWare product lines"
03-Dec-2008 David Boies Gets a Letter From the Appeals Court Chief Clerk
27-Nov-2008 The Appeals Paperwork Begins
25-Nov-2008 SCO Files Notice of Appeal in Novell Litigation - Updated 2Xs
30-Jul-2008 SCO Tells Customers and Partners It Will Appeal Shortly
[ back to top ]


© Copyright 2008-2011 Pamela Jones

This page is maintained by PJ and Erwan.


Last Updated Monday, February 27 2012 @ 10:40 PM EST


Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )