| 
     
     | 
    
    
    
    
  
    
      
       
| Authored by: feldegast on Saturday, June 09 2012 @ 03:18 PM EDT |  
So they can be fixed 
 
--- 
IANAL 
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License 
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0 
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | # ]
   |  
 |   
| Authored by: feldegast on Saturday, June 09 2012 @ 03:19 PM EDT |  
Please make links clickable 
 
--- 
IANAL 
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License 
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0 
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | # ]
   |  
 |   
| Authored by: feldegast on Saturday, June 09 2012 @ 03:20 PM EDT |  
Please make links clickable 
 
--- 
IANAL 
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License 
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0 
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | # ]
   |  
 |   
| Authored by: feldegast on Saturday, June 09 2012 @ 03:22 PM EDT |  
Thank you for your support, book a page to transcribe here 
  http://ww
w.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php%3f
page=ComesBooking--- IANAL 
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0 
P.J. has permission for commercial use. [ Reply to This | # ]
   |  
 |   
| Authored by: BobDowling on Saturday, June 09 2012 @ 03:38 PM EDT |  
I think we should try to get the minutes of the hearing. It's
expensive, ... 
PJ, how much?  I have a pointer hovering over
the donate button. 
I'm dying to know if Novell commented on the changed
time during the hearing itself.  I wonder how much notice they got. [ Reply to This | # ]
   |  
 |   
| Authored by: BJ on Saturday, June 09 2012 @ 05:11 PM EDT |  
After all -- they might stand a chance of being proclaimed 
'Major good
guy'  for it, by none other than Groklaw. 
 
bjd
 
  
[ Reply to This | # ]
   |  
 |   
| Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, June 09 2012 @ 06:19 PM EDT |  
As this was "sub cura", could this be a preliminary hearing
in preparation
for the June 22 official hearing in Utah? 
Just guessing and trying to
assume good faith until 
otherwise proven. [ Reply to This | # ]
   |  
 |   
| Authored by: STrRedWolf on Saturday, June 09 2012 @ 08:42 PM EDT |  
The one question that popped into my mind is that if the court did not issue a 
scheduling meeting or any reason for a private meeting, is it grounds for Novel 
to appeal and have the judge struck from the case? 
 
[ Reply to This | # ]
   |  
 |   
| Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, June 10 2012 @ 05:42 PM EDT |  
can we please kill software patents now? 
oh yes, and business process patents too[ Reply to This | # ]
   |  
 |   
| Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, June 11 2012 @ 12:54 AM EDT |  
| PJ, do we know _anything_ about what was decided at the hearing? [ Reply to This | # ]
   |  
- re: Updated - Authored by: PJ on Monday, June 11 2012 @ 02:57 AM EDT
 
  |  
       
     | 
   
 
     | 
   
    
 |