decoration decoration

When you want to know more...
For layout only
Site Map
About Groklaw
Legal Research
ApplevSamsung p.2
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Gordon v MS
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
MS Litigations
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
OOXML Appeals
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v Novell
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Unix Books


Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.

You won't find me on Facebook


Donate Paypal

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.

What's New

No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

No | 211 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Do you trust Oracle? Enough to use Oracle Linux ?
Authored by: greed on Wednesday, July 18 2012 @ 03:02 PM EDT
I am so opposed to Oracle that, when given the choice between shelling out for
another VMware Fusion license and using VirtualBox for free, I paid VMware more

I have issues with the way CentOS handles their distribution: I feel their build
procedure is far too secretive. (I want to be able to build my own version of
the distro, should I so desire.) As a result, I switched to Scientific Linux.

I know the two distros have different goals, with CentOS ensuring full binary
compatibility with RHEL, while Scientific Linux only worries about source
compatibility. But I only run Free software on my Linux servers, so source
compatibility is plenty.

But I'd use Ubuntu before I go near anything from Oracle. (I'm not a Debian
fan. And Ubuntu just triggers "why did you do THAT?!" screams.)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Do you trust Oracle? Enough to use Oracle Linux ?
Authored by: Tyro on Wednesday, July 18 2012 @ 03:11 PM EDT

Having answered that, I should elaborate that I won't be using Red Hat again
soon either. The last time I installed it in a partition it refused to
recognize my Debian partition at boot time. (Well, that may have been CentOS,
and may have been Fedora. I presume that it applies to the entire family of

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Oracle Linux ? Yes
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 18 2012 @ 03:58 PM EDT

But only if it doesn't come equiped with non-GPL licensed code you can't easily remove.

And I certainly wouldn't use Oracle Database at home - I don't accept their license terms.


[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

You mean the "Unbreakable Linux"?
Authored by: hAckz0r on Wednesday, July 18 2012 @ 04:04 PM EDT
If I had a license to Oracle's Linux on my machine of any flavour, I would first break it and then send them the dust (forensic evidence) left over from all the security exploits I generated. After that I'd send the software patches to the kernel devs, or whoever maintains that particular module of code, and just DBAN and "fdisk -l /dev/sdb" for a fresh GPT partition table. All the way down to the lowest levels of scrubbing the disk drive, kind of like washing your hands after touching something rather vile I think. Come to think about it, I would also throw the install disks in the trash and scrub my hands for an hour. Does that answer the question?

The Geeks IP Law: The future health of a Corporation is measured as the inverse of the number of IP lawsuits they have filed in the last 3 years.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Do you trust Oracle? Enough to use Oracle Linux ?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 18 2012 @ 04:23 PM EDT
I s'pose the main reason I would want to use Oracle Linux (and I don't) is for all the other stuff they float on top of it. They do patch regularly. I won't speculate on whether they patch often enough, or if the extent of the patches reveals underlying weakness of their system. Some evidence can be got from Oracle

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

No. Why?
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, July 18 2012 @ 06:07 PM EDT
Since Oracle simply rips off a well known distro, why would you bother?

And since it isn't Slackware, I wouldn't waste my time.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Amen - Authored by: Wol on Thursday, July 19 2012 @ 09:31 AM EDT
  • Point of order... - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 19 2012 @ 01:11 PM EDT
Authored by: Kilz on Wednesday, July 18 2012 @ 06:53 PM EDT
I trust them about as far as I can toss a Dodge Ram pickup.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Why Oracle?
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 19 2012 @ 07:00 AM EDT
If you want to pay for "Red Hat Linux," get Red Hat. If
you're poor, or a home user, get CentOS or Scientific Linux.
What's the supposed advantage of "Oracle" (rebranded Red Hat)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Do you trust Oracle? Enough to use Oracle Linux ?
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, July 19 2012 @ 01:13 PM EDT
No Chance.

Even though I know Orcale's Linux will be exactly the same as what I use, but
with less grief, I simply don't trust them not to pull a fast one.

So no, their binaries won't be going onto my machines. They can thank messrs
Ellison, Boies, Schiller and Flexner for that.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )