decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Fandroid??? | 627 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
-10 misinformed
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, November 02 2012 @ 11:06 AM EDT
Google has actually caused moto to drop some claim and cases
since it became involved.

None of the cases would have been possible if moto's
competitors had decided to negotiate at all. They are using
patented technology with no license (and no attempt to
acquire a license), and this nonsense I about trying to
cover up that fact and make themselves out to be victims.

FRAND does not mean that licenses are automatic without
negotiations or payment. Use of patented technology without
a license is infringement regardless of whether it's FRAND
pledged or not.

FRAND is not free or public domain whatever MS and Apple may
wish

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Fandroid???
Authored by: Anonymous on Sunday, November 11 2012 @ 03:50 AM EST
Undoubtedly you are trying to be cute or, perhaps, even clever. But within the
typical rules for Enish (to the extent such exist) I cannot make any sense out
of your term. I can imagine "droid fan" working in that sentence, but
that may not sound as cute to your ears.

(I know. I know. Don't feed the trolls ...)

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )