decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books
Your contributions keep Groklaw going.
To donate to Groklaw 2.0:

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


Contact PJ

Click here to email PJ. You won't find me on Facebook Donate Paypal


User Functions

Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User

No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Right... | 627 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Right...
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 01 2012 @ 01:36 PM EDT

So the bottom line is that:

    Whether or not the representation in Court this morning was involved with the UK page change...
    Said representation is now involved in presenting such arguments as "we complied with the letter of the order"
That's the responsibility I'm refering to.

Ultimately, I think the solution - if Apple pushes it that far - is:

    First: Sentence the highest level decision maker at UK Apple to time in Jail till the Site is corrected
If that is failing:
    Second: Sentence the highest level Legal rep at UK Apple to same
If that is failing:
    Well... I guess if the both the previous don't elicit the correct response, it's time to order a European Union wide arrest warrent for the head of Apple itself.
And if that continues to fail (remember, we're way over the board on extremes now):
    Start moving to find the Corporation in the EU marketplace to the kind of billion dollar fine MS paid.
And if that still fails:
    Eliminate Apple from the EU Marketplace!
It really all does depend on two factors:
    1) How far Apple is willing to push the situation
    2) How far the EU Courts are willing to go to enforce their orders

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

  • Right... - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, November 01 2012 @ 02:20 PM EDT
  • Right... - Authored by: Tyro on Thursday, November 01 2012 @ 03:04 PM EDT
Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )