|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 17 2012 @ 12:02 PM EDT |
That's clearly talking about a trademark lisence, not a copyright lisence.
So why are Oracle not suing over trademark violations? Oh, that's right,
because Google decided they'd be just fine without that little coffecup logo.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 17 2012 @ 04:12 PM EDT |
Yup, that line above the "Must take license"
partly obscured in the drop shadow of the highlight,
"Need coffee cup logo"
Oracle's part quotes, part obscurations continue slides 40-48 where
they harp on about Google's total awareness of the need for license.
Read the slides carefully and it is obvious Google wanted a license to
1. call the product Java,
2. use the coffee cup logo
3. gain acceptance from carriers wedded to mainstream technologies,
4. release the Google product under an open source license,
not Sun-Community, nor GPL.
Fast forward to 2008 and Harmony has removed all those reasons.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: jonathon on Tuesday, April 17 2012 @ 04:35 PM EDT |
And I thought it was referring to negotiations about the acceptability of the
Apache License.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|