Authored by: sproggit on Wednesday, April 18 2012 @ 04:23 PM EDT |
I don't mean to be contrary, but that's a big leap, for several reasons.
Firstly, any paralegals working the case are, first and foremost, going to be
anticipating the arguments of opposing counsel, and locating and then preparing
refuting arguments so that the lawyers can brief future witnesses. Next, they
are going to be poring over what opposing counsel do argue and understand their
strategy. If opposing counsel pick up a point of law, then the paralegals will
research it, find where it was applied, by whom, in what context, and what the
rulings were. Anything that they can give back to their lead attorney to help
show the holes in the opposition argument will be useful.
That's not to say some might be very interested in Groklaw. I'm amazed, every
time I visit, at the wealth of experience, knowledge and insight that is shared
so freely. I just think it might be a bit presumptuous of us to think we feature
highly in the deliberations of either party.
But... here's hoping...[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Not just hubris - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 18 2012 @ 04:43 PM EDT
- Hubris - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 18 2012 @ 09:31 PM EDT
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 19 2012 @ 05:33 AM EDT |
Yeah, groklaw is going to win the case for google, go groklaw.....
Please, get over yourselves.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|