|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, April 23 2012 @ 01:54 PM EDT |
Technically a fork really should start from the same
codebase, and then modify it.
Harmony as an independent implementation which has (almost)
the same functionality as the original doesn't really count
as a fork because
1) It started from a different codebase
2) It replicates the functionality of the original very
closely.
I hope the Jury see these documents though, as they clearly
show Sun giving big thumbs up to fragmentation, which
destroys a large part of Oracle's "harm" argument.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Crocodile_Dundee on Monday, April 23 2012 @ 07:52 PM EDT |
A fork is either:
1) An eating device with a handle and the specified number of tines, which has
been built exactly according to the specification, and has been subjected to the
TCK (and passed)
2) An eating implement that is not either a knife or a spoon that doesn't have
tines (or a handle) and cannot be called a fork.
---
---
That's not a law suit. *THIS* is a law suit![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|