|
Authored by: hardmath on Tuesday, April 24 2012 @ 01:57 PM EDT |
I looked through various accounts of the testimony and glanced
at the PDF, also coming up empty as to what is referenced.
It sounds like an email reply chain, where a lot of "> > "
type indents might once have given an impression as to who is
replying to whom, etc. The picture I made was that these, or
the rich-text equivalent (vertical lines at the left margins)
had been omitted or were otherwise "off", making it difficult
to know what was being said by whom.
---
"Prolog is an efficient programming language because it is a very stupid theorem
prover." -- Richard O'Keefe[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: xtifr on Tuesday, April 24 2012 @ 03:02 PM EDT |
Exhibits 11, 12, 125, 212, 213, and 222 have quotes from Rubin which are
indented because it's not Rubin's email. A couple of those contain no
meaningful content except Rubin's.
317 and 321 are emails from
Rubin which also contain nested, quoted emails from Rubin as quoted by
others.
317 is particularly confusing, as it contains a nested
chain of quoting that goes eight deep.
Any of those could have been a
case of selective quoting, where the person who replied to Rubin innocently
snipped off parts that he didn't think were relevant to the current discussion.
(Something I do all the time, though I admit it's a more common habit among
people like me who don't use the horror that is top-quoting.)
125 is the
most bizarre, as the thread seems to start with an empty email from Lindholm,
which was followed by a response from Rubin. Did Lindholm really send an empty
email?
There's also the fact that Oracle seemed to have problems with
their exhibits on the first day of trial. Maybe this was a related issue.
Maybe what they offered in court didn't match what's in the PDF? We don't know.
All we really know is that Rubin complained and the judge didn't overrule
him.
--- Do not meddle in the affairs of Wizards, for it makes them
soggy and hard to light. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- 8 emails - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 24 2012 @ 03:22 PM EDT
- 8 emails - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 24 2012 @ 03:52 PM EDT
- 8 emails - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 24 2012 @ 04:24 PM EDT
- To get a groklaw account - Authored by: feldegast on Tuesday, April 24 2012 @ 04:56 PM EDT
- 8 emails - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 24 2012 @ 06:14 PM EDT
- Fair for Oracle? - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 24 2012 @ 06:32 PM EDT
- 8 emails - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 24 2012 @ 06:52 PM EDT
- 8 emails - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 24 2012 @ 07:07 PM EDT
- 8 emails - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 24 2012 @ 11:55 PM EDT
|
Authored by: mirrorslap on Tuesday, April 24 2012 @ 08:51 PM EDT |
Andy Rubin wasn't dodging. His demeanor suggested to me that he was very
concerned about whether what was in front of him was "doctored" or
not. He
chose to take the truthful course.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|