decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Peer Review Process | 396 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Its time has come. Change is an unstoppable force now...
Authored by: Gringo_ on Wednesday, April 25 2012 @ 08:11 AM EDT

It's all over for the traditional journals now - sooner or later. However, what about the vast horde of papers they are sitting on from the past? Will they hold them ransom for the next century? We might have to enact legislation to nationalize them.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Peer Review Process
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 25 2012 @ 02:18 PM EDT

Now... lessee... who do I trust more:

    A: a peer review process that I don't even know actually happens via individuals whose credentials I have no awareness of
or
    B: a peer review process that includes another University providing open comments by individuals whose credentials are readily available
That's a question that should have such an obvious answer it shouldn't even be worth asking:
    I'll take the open process over the closed process any time!
Well Done Harvard!

RAS

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )