|
Authored by: feldegast on Tuesday, April 24 2012 @ 04:56 PM EDT |
email PJ and she will create one for you
pj2 at groklaw dot
net--- IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 24 2012 @ 06:14 PM EDT |
Oracle may be the party seeking to introduce these exhibits at the trial, but
the prefix "Google" in the identifier on the bottom right means that
they were produced to Oracle from Google's files during discovery before the
trial. Also note that these emails are internal communications between Google
employees. They could only have been altered by Google. As I wrote previously,
the far far more likely scenario is that they were not altered and the witness
simply was being obstructive.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Fair for Oracle? - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 24 2012 @ 06:32 PM EDT
- 8 emails - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 24 2012 @ 06:52 PM EDT
- 8 emails - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, April 24 2012 @ 07:07 PM EDT
|
|
|
|