|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 25 2012 @ 04:35 PM EDT |
Yes, that's exactly how I read it to.
The idea is presumably along the lines of a publisher of a compilation of sci-fi
stories having copyright over the compiled work as a complete compilation,
but not having copyright over all the elements independently, or of subsets of
them - though these may be individually copyrighted.
This perhaps being appropriate analogy due to Java being a compilation of
work by many companies,and that it is copyrighted as a compilation, not as
work by an original author.
Presumably if upheld, this would end this phase of the trial because the
asserted works are legally not copyrighted.
IANAL though so shrug.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- whoops - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 25 2012 @ 04:45 PM EDT
- whoops - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 25 2012 @ 06:00 PM EDT
- Not know? - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 25 2012 @ 06:05 PM EDT
- whoops - Authored by: jvillain on Wednesday, April 25 2012 @ 06:07 PM EDT
- whoops - Authored by: eachus on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 12:06 AM EDT
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 25 2012 @ 05:05 PM EDT |
Or more like the entire Java software that is copyrighted has to be taken as a
whole.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- whoops - Authored by: darrellb on Wednesday, April 25 2012 @ 05:26 PM EDT
- whoops - Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, April 25 2012 @ 05:43 PM EDT
- whoops - Authored by: jjs on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 06:20 AM EDT
- That's my take - Authored by: Ian Al on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 07:49 AM EDT
|
|
|
|