|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 03:47 PM EDT |
Its not saying the APIs aren't copyrightable, or that they aren't copyrighted,
only that Oracle has no standing to bring suit. And if the judge doesn't agree,
then he has to conversely rule that any infringement is de minimus as the 37
APIs are a tiny fraction of Java as a whole.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Not quite - Authored by: Ed L. on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 07:50 PM EDT
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 09:25 PM EDT |
is that Oracle, by virtue of not registering copyright on individual API's,
can't bring claims on the individual API's themselves.
Remember, a claimed copyright is automatic on publication and requires no
further action other than the publication itself. Copyright registration is a
legal requirement needed prior to any legal action being served. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|