Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 09:30 AM EDT |
near the top [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: feldegast on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 09:42 AM EDT |
a number of ? in the document should be other characters,
quotes of one type or another or a #
---
IANAL
My posts are ©2004-2012 and released under the Creative Commons License
Attribution-Noncommercial 2.0
P.J. has permission for commercial use.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Christian on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 11:26 AM EDT |
There is a large block of extra text inserted in the middle of the correct text
(everything between "supporting" and "reconsideration" and I
think). According to the PDF, it should be this:
(ECF No. 777 at 2.) Oracle also stated that it had "substantial arguments
supporting reconsideration, raising a credible prospect that one or more of the
rejections will be reversed by the examiners." (Id.) It was for this reason
that Oracle made its withdrawal conditional.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 07:54 PM EDT |
n/t [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 10:43 PM EDT |
Attack of the docu men? (Correction needed in article title.) [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, April 27 2012 @ 09:49 AM EDT |
Page 7 of 982 the link to footnote 5 is wrong as actual foot
note is at the end footnote 4 [... (Dkt. 525 at 15). 5 For
reasons relating...]. The hyperlink for this 982 footnote 5
incorrectly links
to (plain text)
http://groklawstatic.ibiblio.org/article.php%3f
story=20120426075025438#foot5
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|