Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 02:42 PM EDT |
Discrediting people as they are not legal experts.
They seem to want to have their cake and eat it on that
topic.
I wonder why Google didn't ask Rubin if he was a legal expert
on licensing terms, and then paint him as a technical expert,
but as a legal fool (at least I don't recall seeing that they
did.)[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 02:48 PM EDT |
Scroll to minute 33, listen for about 10 minutes. Funny.
Brian
Cantrill on Oracle and
dTrace
Compares Oracle to a lawn mover. A mower doesn't care if you
stick
your hand inside. It can't. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: indyandy on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 02:49 PM EDT |
Call me naïve if you wish but I always thought it was the company lawyers' job
to implement the business strategy.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 04:07 PM EDT |
My goodness, are lawyers the only people allowed to speak officially about a
company's legal position? Can we dismiss anything Gates, Balmer, Ellison,
Schwartz, McNealy or any other top executives say about their companies?
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- Apparently so - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 04:35 PM EDT
- Apparently so - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 05:02 PM EDT
- Apparently so - Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 09:14 PM EDT
- Lindholm? - Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 09:47 PM EDT
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, April 26 2012 @ 04:11 PM EDT |
It's not the first time, nor probably the last, in this case that
Oracle has objected to a witness' statement because
"he's not a lawyer". Reminds me of the folks here
who say they dare not read patents because of what it
might do to their employment. So is this opening another door?
That engineers should not read licenses either, leave all
that to the lawyers. Sounds like make-work for the litigation
industry with all the new infringement suits because an engineer
did not read the license before using something.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|