Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 01:13 AM EDT |
If that is true I'm gonna make my wife sit the bar.... she is a natural born
confrontational debater. :-)
cheers
Franki[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 04:20 AM EDT |
"Litigators don't do it just for the money. "
On either side untold millions of dollars are spent, teams of god only knows how
many people put together to fight the battle.
And then there's the judge a government official, who earns a fraction of what
Van, Jacobs and Boies earn. A man who doesn't have the kind of staff the other
two parties have. A guy who's doing OTHER cases in the afternoon.
The 3 lead lawyers in this case are amazing fellows, but so is the man in their
referee....[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: cricketjeff on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 04:26 AM EDT |
Probably true
but ...
How about suggesting they take a pay cut to the level of, say, high school
teachers, now count the number of top litigators still working.
They don't just do it for the money, but the money is by far the largest reason
they do it!
---
There is nothing in life that doesn't look better after a good cup of tea.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 05:05 AM EDT |
Yes the firm makes the money, but at least for some of the headliners whose
names are in the firm's name (Boies, Van Nest) they gain personally quite a bit.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- shakes hands - Authored by: PJ on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 07:59 AM EDT
- shakes hands - Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 08:59 AM EDT
|