|
Authored by: s65_sean on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 06:05 PM EDT |
I'm not saying that the particular blog post in question was or wasn't an
official company statement. I personally think that McNealy was lying, but
that's just my opinion. I'm just saying that the fact that Schwartz later added
the disclaimers to his blog posts after some date gives some validity to
Oracle's argument that the particular post was not an official company
statement.
PJ seems to take that statement in the annual report, which was created more
than 6 months after the blog post in question, to be the absolute status of the
blog at the time that the post was made, and I was merely offering a possible
reason why Oracle could argue that it wasn't. After all, they did produce one
more quarterly report after the blog in question, and before the annual report
was produced, where they did not make any mention of the CEO's blog.
I'm just saying that maybe PJ is making more out of this than she should.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|