|
Authored by: PJ on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 05:09 PM EDT |
Again, you are wrong. The blog post in
the trial was in Nov. of 2007, hence
covered by the 10K.
http://web.archive.org/web/
20101023072550/http://blogs.sun.com/
jonathan/entry/congratulations_google
The first SEC notice was in May of that year, but
it was the same blog before and after by the
same CEO on the same Sun website that they
called corporate blogs. They got permission from
the SEC to add the SEC notice to the blog and
then added it, but it was officially corporate
before then. The SEC didn't decide that issue,
it just demonstrated that from a certain date,
it *recognized* it as such. But Sun had already
decided that this was a corporate blog.
Honestly you are just legally wrong no matter how
you twist it around in your head. I know it's
unpleasant to be wrong in public, and I'm sorry to
have to do it to you, but Groklaw is about
finding truth, not inventing theories.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|