decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Not all things in the annual report had to happen the first day of the fiscal year. | 287 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Not all things in the annual report had to happen the first day of the fiscal year.
Authored by: PJ on Tuesday, May 01 2012 @ 05:09 PM EDT
Again, you are wrong. The blog post in
the trial was in Nov. of 2007, hence
covered by the 10K.
http://web.archive.org/web/
20101023072550/http://blogs.sun.com/
jonathan/entry/congratulations_google

The first SEC notice was in May of that year, but
it was the same blog before and after by the
same CEO on the same Sun website that they
called corporate blogs. They got permission from
the SEC to add the SEC notice to the blog and
then added it, but it was officially corporate
before then. The SEC didn't decide that issue,
it just demonstrated that from a certain date,
it *recognized* it as such. But Sun had already
decided that this was a corporate blog.

Honestly you are just legally wrong no matter how
you twist it around in your head. I know it's
unpleasant to be wrong in public, and I'm sorry to
have to do it to you, but Groklaw is about
finding truth, not inventing theories.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )