|
Authored by: jvillain on Thursday, May 03 2012 @ 09:17 PM EDT |
I think the judges ideas looked reasonable in the beginning. But thinks have now
gotten away from him. It will be hard to clean this mess up now if he plans to
decide that the API is protectable. If he comes down on the side that the API is
not protectable then this can still be saved. Other wise Google has a lot of
grounds to get their appeal going.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Thursday, May 03 2012 @ 10:04 PM EDT |
"assume that APIs and SSO are copyrightable"
Yes, that statement had me scratching my head too. As it is definitely skewed in
favor of Oracle's argument of copyright infringement. Judge Alsup should have
stated something such as, APIs and SSO may or may not be copyrightable.
No, wonder the jury is deadlocked.
stage_v
from under the bridge
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|