decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
Correction | 697 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Question 4 Yes uhh No ...YesNo. Only 4A really matters.
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 03:56 PM EDT
I agree, what I meant by reasonable conclusion was just as
the questions were asked, not by the evidence submitted. I
was unclear. I would have actually answered yes to both
based on what I have read here.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Correction
Authored by: calris74 on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 10:52 PM EDT
NO Google in fact did not rely on that "in deciding to use the structure, sequence, and organization of the copyrighted compilable code without obtaining a license"
Google did not convince the jury that they relied on Sun's behaviour as a basis for their decision not to pursue a license.

I doubt they'll make the same mistake at the retrial

Which makes this an even bigger loss for Oracle

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Question 4 Yes uhh No ...YesNo. Only 4A really matters.
Authored by: rsteinmetz70112 on Tuesday, May 08 2012 @ 01:09 AM EDT
Isn't Question 4 an advisory opinion?

---
Rsteinmetz - IANAL therefore my opinions are illegal.

"I could be wrong now, but I don't think so."
Randy Newman - The Title Theme from Monk

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )