|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 03:35 PM EDT |
NO Google in fact did not rely on that "in deciding to use
the structure, sequence, and organization of the copyrighted
compilable code without obtaining a license"
Because Google never made such a decision as suggested in
that question.
However 4A is actually the important question. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: mcinsand on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 04:09 PM EDT |
If Sun led Google to believe that no license was required to spread Java through
Android, then Sun and successors lost any rights to claim infringement later; an
organization cannot legally encourage someone to use something freely and then
later try to punish the users for it.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 07 2012 @ 05:26 PM EDT |
It says to me that the Jury believed Google would have taken the same
course
of action regardless of what Sun said. But, as it turned out, the Jury
thinks
Sun said it was okay. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|