|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 08 2012 @ 11:03 AM EDT |
He wants to make sure he makes such a ruling on the proper
facts. On Friday (due over the weekend) he asked for
additional briefing, both on some details around how API's
work and what impact (if any) the parties think the recent
EU ruling has.
While I expect the briefs came in over the weekend, the
judge needs at worst a few days to mull them over before
ruling. And that's assuming he feels he has all the facts.
Also, someone more familiar with the current state of motion
pracice and civ pro can weigh in on whether Google formally
needs to file for judgement as a matter of law on this, or
if they already did.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Ian Al on Tuesday, May 08 2012 @ 11:47 AM EDT |
.
---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: PJ on Tuesday, May 08 2012 @ 11:56 AM EDT |
He's waiting for briefs, answering his
questions. He can't rule until he's sure
he understands, for one thing.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|