|
Authored by: Ian Al on Tuesday, May 08 2012 @ 11:43 AM EDT |
I think they appeared in the Android repositories and I suppose they might have
got downloaded with the rest of the stuff for development purposes.
I think Google's point was that they were never shipped on a 'phone.
---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Tuesday, May 08 2012 @ 01:56 PM EDT |
. [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: bugstomper on Tuesday, May 08 2012 @ 02:28 PM EDT |
That's part of what I speculated the jury might have thought. This was before
OpenJDK, so it was not GPL code, but Java was free to download and use. The jury
could have thought that Oracle did not establish that Google made any use of
these particular test files that would be infringement given that all they did
was download them, which was ok, and use them, which was ok, but did not
distribute them as part of the running Android code.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|