|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 09 2012 @ 07:38 AM EDT |
And when you copy the SSO you see in the Spec into your source code.
And the Jury agreed.
We await Judge Alsups view and the inevitable appeals.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 09 2012 @ 09:53 AM EDT |
Hmm, could one make an argument that a patent is invalid
because it fails to properly disclose the invention?[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 09 2012 @ 10:03 AM EDT |
To copy the SSO you wouldn't have to see the source code, or
it could be sufficiently uncertain to determine if an
alleged infringer had access to the source code or not.
However the more important point is: if some entity wants
copyright, then they must be obliged to actually publish
their work. In the case of a computer program that would be
the full source code. If they don't do that then they should
not be entitled to copyright for their source code.
Thus equality before the law is facilitated. Making it
possible to review & audit the Software of closed source
companys for any infringements.
[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|