|
Authored by: Ian Al on Friday, May 11 2012 @ 06:05 AM EDT |
I don't remember that being on the accused devices list.
Also, none of the accused manufacturers are infringing because they are not in
US jurisdiction (Microsoft v. AT&T). The 'phones are all designed and
manufactured well away from the US rotten patent borough.
Finally, both patents are only allegedly used by Android on developers'
computers and no US-based developers have been entered into evidence as
practising the patents. The patents are not used on Android 'phones.
Suddenly, I realise that the jury instructions are fatally flawed. They should
exclude all activities outside of the US as the judge has already decided in the
case that such activity is non-infringing.
---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|