|
Authored by: Steve Martin on Saturday, May 12 2012 @ 06:31 AM EDT |
I believe you may be remembering this stipulation
between Oracle and Google,
in which Google agreed to drop their invalidity
contention
regarding only the '104 patent, in return for which
Oracle
agreed to stipulate that (for purposes of damages) they
did not mark their
products as practicing the patent. I'm not
aware of anything from Google saying
they were dropping
their invalidity contentions for all the
patents-in-suit.
--- "When I say something, I put my name next to it."
-- Isaac Jaffe, "Sports Night" [ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 12 2012 @ 06:55 AM EDT |
because they themselves do not want to invalidate all their own software
patents... none of the big boys are going to go for invalidation of software
patents because they have so many of their own...[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
- That's silly - Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 12 2012 @ 12:09 PM EDT
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 12 2012 @ 06:58 AM EDT |
If Bilski really made software patents invalid, then why wasn't any of these
patents completely invalidated by the patent office when they were challenged?
Like it or not, I think it's not going to be that easy.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|