|
Authored by: Anonymous on Saturday, May 12 2012 @ 01:43 AM EDT |
The report is excellent! Thanks!
None of the other irrelevant twittering clods have relayed Oracle's Dramatic
rebuttals! They're nonsensical and quite humorous. Kudos for the
descriptions.
To those who work in software Oracle's flamboyant accusatory questions and
statements are ridiculous.
Translated example for you lay folk, if this was over a hand grenade patent.
Oracle: Before throwing you admit the manual says one should count to only
"three"?!
Witness: yes.
O: And that, "the number of the counting shall not be two, unless
proceeding directly... to THREE"?!!
W: yes.
O: And what of four?! "four, one should NOT COUNT"?!!?! Is this
Correct?!?!
W: well, yes.
O: Five?! Should one count to FIVE?!?!
W: no. Five is right out.
O: NO FURTHER QUESTIONS!!!!!!111one!![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|