Authored by: SpaceLifeForm on Monday, May 14 2012 @ 03:52 PM EDT |
Unfortunately for the BS&F team, he
is way ahead of them, and can smell the [redacted].
Jacobs would have tossed this out to
the jury, but they were not present.
It would not surprise me that Jacobs
just heard the term 'set theory' last night.
---
You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 14 2012 @ 06:06 PM EDT |
It's all bunk.If your top set is "phone" then there are subsets of
phone and there would be multiple sub subsets of "dynamic" and
"runtime". Each "phone executable" subset would have a
"runtime" but to be accurate to your set and subset diagram you
should be calling it "runtime-executable-a" and another one
"runtime-executable-b". Oracle conveniently calls all the runtimes
runtime because the phone is turned on. The overture to set theory depends on
you looking into the Oracle Carney Midway House of mirrors.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: mexaly on Monday, May 14 2012 @ 11:46 PM EDT |
There is no "Basic Set Theory." Slap that lawyer with a paradox.
---
IANAL, but I watch actors play lawyers on high-definition television.
Thanks to our hosts and the legal experts that make Groklaw great.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|