|
Authored by: Ian Al on Tuesday, May 15 2012 @ 07:47 AM EDT |
You had to rub it in that this is all abstract ideas being interpreted by
innuendo to get close to the abstract meanings in the patent.
It pains me so much that it is the functions disclosed in the patent that are
protected. If the process is carried out by a mathematician, there is no case.
Of course, it is only abstract functional ideas. First the mathematician would
have to choose a math language and devise the algorithm.
It is not applied math. It is not math related to a real world application. It
is an abstract math process.
Because it is abstract concepts used by software programmers in a computer
program it becomes protectable and worth beeelions.
OK, I am back in my calm space, now.
---
Regards
Ian Al
Software Patents: It's the disclosed functions in the patent, stupid![ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|