|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 14 2012 @ 04:45 PM EDT |
There's some "super extreme" (according to Alsup) legal
theory that they are going to get "infringer's profits"
instead, which will be beelions.
Of course the fact that they have no evidence to support any
profits being made, and the other fact that they have no way
of introducing such evidence due to their incompetent damages
expert being banned from further testimony due to repeatedly
ignoring court orders might make this difficult unless the
judge really helps them out somehow.[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
Authored by: Anonymous on Monday, May 14 2012 @ 05:02 PM EDT |
I believe that since Oracle filed for copyright as a
collective work that they are only able to get damages once.
I think they would have had to register each java file
separately with the copyright office to even try to claim
damages separately on the files.
From 17 USC 504 c.1:
"For the purposes of this subsection, all
the parts of a compilation or derivative work constitute one
work."[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]
|
|
|
|
|