decoration decoration
Stories

GROKLAW
When you want to know more...
decoration
For layout only
Home
Archives
Site Map
Search
About Groklaw
Awards
Legal Research
Timelines
ApplevSamsung
ApplevSamsung p.2
ArchiveExplorer
Autozone
Bilski
Cases
Cast: Lawyers
Comes v. MS
Contracts/Documents
Courts
DRM
Gordon v MS
GPL
Grokdoc
HTML How To
IPI v RH
IV v. Google
Legal Docs
Lodsys
MS Litigations
MSvB&N
News Picks
Novell v. MS
Novell-MS Deal
ODF/OOXML
OOXML Appeals
OraclevGoogle
Patents
ProjectMonterey
Psystar
Quote Database
Red Hat v SCO
Salus Book
SCEA v Hotz
SCO Appeals
SCO Bankruptcy
SCO Financials
SCO Overview
SCO v IBM
SCO v Novell
SCO:Soup2Nuts
SCOsource
Sean Daly
Software Patents
Switch to Linux
Transcripts
Unix Books

Gear

Groklaw Gear

Click here to send an email to the editor of this weblog.


You won't find me on Facebook


Donate

Donate Paypal


No Legal Advice

The information on Groklaw is not intended to constitute legal advice. While Mark is a lawyer and he has asked other lawyers and law students to contribute articles, all of these articles are offered to help educate, not to provide specific legal advice. They are not your lawyers.

Here's Groklaw's comments policy.


What's New

STORIES
No new stories

COMMENTS last 48 hrs
No new comments


Sponsors

Hosting:
hosted by ibiblio

On servers donated to ibiblio by AMD.

Webmaster
yes, I have read both patents | 484 comments | Create New Account
Comments belong to whoever posts them. Please notify us of inappropriate comments.
Is that all you got?
Authored by: symbolset on Tuesday, May 15 2012 @ 11:32 PM EDT
It seems likely they've brought their best patents to bear in this case. I do
believe at the outset the judge asked them something like "Is that all you've
got?" With their own counsel pointing out in closing that Google is the company
that organizes the world's information, it's likely they'll take on an easier
target next time.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

yes, I have read both patents
Authored by: Anonymous on Wednesday, May 16 2012 @ 01:52 AM EDT
Not sure if the shareholders will quietly let them have another go at it, if the
patents in this lawsuit was considered their "best". My bet is that
they will go after companies with less resources and less desire to fight back,
while trying their best not to end up having more of their patents invalidated,
so that they can sell them off to the highest bidder before they expire.

[ Reply to This | Parent | # ]

Groklaw © Copyright 2003-2013 Pamela Jones.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Comments are owned by the individual posters.

PJ's articles are licensed under a Creative Commons License. ( Details )